Fortunately, Woolley, born in Chicago, Ill., had other ideas. Her family, and she, like many others during the so-called Progressive Era, developed a conviction that science could solve social ills. In 1893, thanks to a scholarship, she enrolled at the newly founded University of Chicago, where she gravitated toward the burgeoning field of experimental psychology. A graduate fellowship set the stage for her dissertation,, published as a monograph in 1903.
Biology alone couldn’t account for differences between men and women, she argued. The way they were raised and treated had to be considered, too. Boys, for example, were encouraged to exercise and play, while girls were kept at home and discouraged from activities that weren’t deemed “lady-like.” No wonder they scored differently on physical tests, she wrote. Though such conclusions may seem obvious now, they directly challenged the “rampant biological essentialism of her time,” says Rutherford.
aka Having a male parts doesn't make you a procreating heterosexual male. Having a womb doesn't make you a child carrying procreating incubating female. It is what you imagine yourself to be, regardless of how children are demonstrably born. This, is the ideology of an imbecile.
Today a man can get a man pregnant. This is called popular science or LGBTQ insanity not factual science. Keep LGBTQ out of science!
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Mirror Celeb - 🏆 476. / 51 Read more »
Source: SFGate - 🏆 534. / 51 Read more »
Source: ForbesWomen - 🏆 477. / 51 Read more »
Plants will grow anywhere, in a rock, water, a crack in the wall. L'acqua lunare dove la trovi. So?
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Source: nbcbayarea - 🏆 596. / 51 Read more »