last week, a variety of observers took note of the lengthy and methodical strategy that preceded it. The opinion didn’t just happen; opponents of reproductive rights executed a complex, years-long strategy to achieve their regressive goal.
It fell to the Biden administration to settle on a new plan, which the Supreme Court’s conservatives preemptively rejected before it existed, concluding that the EPA’s powers in this area deserve to be curtailed. Kagan, who was joined in her dissent by Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor, also noted that majority’s impositions on the EPA’s authority “fly in the face of the statute Congress wrote. The majority says it is simply ‘not plausible’ that Congress enabled EPA to regulate power plants’ emissions through generation shifting. But that is just what Congress did when it broadly authorized EPA in Section 111 to select the ‘best system of emission reduction’ for power plants.
MaddowBlog Good. Money laundering schemes should be difficult if not impossible to do. Especially by the federal government.
MaddowBlog 😂
MaddowBlog Ummmm,that’s steam!
MaddowBlog Kagan has rejected the rule of law. She support unelected bureaucracy making demands on citizens. The majority of the court supports democracy.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: sfexaminer - 🏆 236. / 63 Read more »
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »