Our analysis used large-scale quantitative data to assess how the public conversation surrounding these journalists changed in the aftermath of being targeted by prominent media personalities. The research findings showed sharp increases in harmful speech after the journalists wereFor each of the three case studies, we first collected tweets that mentioned Lorenz or Heffernan in the days before and after they were targeted by Greenwald or Carlson.
These values were scored from 0 to 1, where items scored closer to one are more likely to contain harmful text. We then plotted the 24-hour moving average of toxicity, threat, insult, identity attack, and sexually explicit tweets before and after a figure targeted a female journalist. By taking the average of these scores for a given time period, we can approximate the proportion of these tweets that were harmful.
After Carlson targeted Lorenz in a segment on his Fox News show, we found that one in two tweets mentioning Lorenz contained either toxic or insulting language. Overall, the rate of harmful speech in her mentions increased by 115% following Carlson’s segment. Figure 1 plots the change in the online conversation around Lorenz following Carlson’s attack.In Figure 2, we plot the 24-hour moving average of tweets before and after Greenwald targeted Lorenz.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »
Social-media platforms failing to tackle abuse of scientistsA report by activists found that half of debunked online disinformation targeting three prominent scientists remains live and unlabelled. Tony 'I am the science' Fauc¡ is an embarrassment to our field. Science is a process where we ask questions, not a person who is beyond question. Everyone I know who worked w/ him at the NIH said he's a jerk and a megalomaniac too. Don't throw his pic up here and expect sympathy Any scientist who is incapable of defending their position in an open debate is not a scientist. how much dotcom owes scientists
Source: Nature - 🏆 64. / 68 Read more »