While benchmarks for the A350M aren’t astounding, you shouldn’t expect a card made for ultraportable devices to stand up to those like the RTX 3050, which are still intended for gaming. Despite showcasing the FPS of certain games at 1080P on the Arc GPUs, Intel’s A350M and A370M aren’t mainstreaming gaming cards. Instead, Intel designed these chips for gaming on more casual laptops.
As such, you’re never going to see these lower-powered cards performing on par with the gaming beasts of Nvidia’s Ampere series. But that doesn’t mean that the A350M benchmarks are bad news. In fact, they’re actually pretty solid benchmarks for what these cards are supposed to be. A replacement for integrated graphics in ultraportable devices.
You also have to take into account the other features that they offer, like ray-tracing support and Intel’s upcoming XeSS AI-upscaling. These are features you won’t find on the older cards that the A350M compares to. They’re also not features you’ll find supported in Intel’s current integrated graphics systems, either.Default VS Performance mode
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: engadget - 🏆 276. / 63 Read more »
Source: BGR - 🏆 234. / 63 Read more »
Intel shows off its first Arc desktop GPU, coming summer 2022A first look at the final Arc GPU hardware robindreizer Limited Edition? This'll be scalped on ebay before it launches. Limited edition!!!?
Source: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 Read more »
Source: ForbesTech - 🏆 318. / 59 Read more »
Source: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 Read more »
Source: DigitalTrends - 🏆 95. / 65 Read more »