to play the “Sleeping Beauty” baddie in 2014’s live-action redo was a dream-casting coup for which the studio was rewarded with three-quarters of a billion dollars at the global box office.
Why would a lethal iron allergy even matter, you wonder? In a fit of world-building gone horribly wrong, screenwriters Micah Fitzerman-Blue, Noah Harpster and Linda Woolverton have taken the “Sleeping Beauty” and given it an entirely unwelcome “Game of Thrones”-esque spin. The new “Maleficent” movie, even more than the last, is preoccupied with palace intrigues, elaborate conspiracies between rival species and an unhealthy obsession with war.
It makes me angry to think what Disney has done with its most beloved “properties” — to use the term that reduces these pieces of shared cultural heritage to exploitable commodities. Not all of the spinoffs and remakes disrespect the classics , and some have done wonders to extend the appeal of the Disney spirit to a new generation of audiences. Of these, Kenneth Branagh’s “Cinderella” is perhaps the most enchanting, while Tim Burton should be kept as far away from these projects as possible.
Discovering fellow fey Conall and a handful of diverse bat-winged warrior tribes mostly serves to dilute Maleficent’s incredible specialness. She’s no longer bad, and she’s no longer unique, making her merely fierce — which ain’t nothing.
Contrary to what this article states, Maleficent’s vulnerability to iron is not new. It played a crucial role in the plot of the 2014 film. Also, the climax of the movie specifically explains what makes Maleficent unique from others within her species. Article is misleading.
Contrary to what this article states, Maleficent’s vulnerability to iron is not new. It played a crucial role in the plot of the first film. Also, the climax of the movie specifically explains what makes Maleficent unique from others within her species. Article is misleading.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: VogueRunway - 🏆 705. / 51 Read more »
Source: Gossip Cop - 🏆 398. / 53 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: VogueRunway - 🏆 705. / 51 Read more »
Source: Gossip Cop - 🏆 398. / 53 Read more »