Facing a heap of defeat, progressives stake hopes on spending bill

With a long list of other goals tattered by Democrats’ thin majorities, liberals are pinning their hopes on a social spending megabill.

9/27/2021 5:02:00 PM

Immigration, voting rights, policing, gun control: Congress is filled with liberal hopes crushed by the reality of slim Democratic majorities. So progressives are digging in on what could be their last chance at success in years.

With a long list of other goals tattered by Democrats’ thin majorities, liberals are pinning their hopes on a social spending megabill.

Link CopiedImmigration, voting rights, policing, gun control: Congress is filled with liberal hopes crushed by the reality of slim Democratic majorities. So progressives are digging in on what could be their last chance at success in years.As Democrats race to pull together a multitrillion-dollar party-line social spending package, Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s left flank is pushing as hard as it can to see progressive priorities reflected. They’ve repeatedly vowed to tank a bipartisan infrastructure bill on the floor as soon as this week if they don’t see more movement — a strategic flex that reflects how many of their other goals have withered.

Clinton shares first update on recovery following hospitalization: 'I’m really glad to be back home' Colorado school district investigates after parents say teachers taped masks to students' faces HBO Max and HBO Lose 1.8M U.S. Subs on Amazon Prime Exit, Global Users Rise by 1.9M

The party-line spending bill was always important to the left, designed as a once-in-a-generation expansion of the social safety net. But as other legislation vital to liberal lawmakers stalled or collapsed, thanks in large part to the threat of a Senate GOP filibuster, the social spending plan acquired outsized importance to progressives.

“Reconciliation is the ball game, at least this year. That and the infrastructure bill,” said Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), describing his years-long push for enacting immigration reform as an “uphill battle.”Liberals started this Congress with high hopes, thanks to full Democratic control of Washington for the first time in a decade. They also had a lengthy to-do list: a pathway to citizenship for many immigrants, a $15 minimum wage, new gun control laws, expanding voting, new standards for racial justice in policing and scrapping the legislative filibuster. But with no substantial progress on any of those priorities, the stakes for the social spending plan couldn’t be higher for the left. headtopics.com

As he drove into the Capitol on Friday, Rep. Anthony Brown (D-Md.) said he got an earful from an upset supporter who was pleased with the party’s progress on the spending plan, but wanted to see more progress on voting rights.“He says, ‘Let me tell you, out here in the streets, Democrats are pissed,” Brown said. “We gave you the House, we gave you the Senate, you got the White House and people are not coming out to vote next midterm if we can't demonstrate that we're going to do everything.”

Democrats are vowing to push forward on as many policy changes as they can fit into their spending bill even as they face significant obstacles, both within the party and procedurally. Privately, some fear the party-line legislation could be their best shot at big wins not just this Congress, but for Biden’s whole presidency, with Republicans widely expected to gain control of the House after the midterms.

Biden and his Hill allies plan to achieve a huge chunk of his agenda through the enormous social spending plan now working its way through Congress, which includes massive investments in child care, education, family leave and health care. The bill — as currently drafted in the House — would be the largest ever passed by Congress.

Still, the Democrats’ sweeping package can’t take on Biden’s entire agenda: Because of Senate rules, the package can only include policies with a sufficiently significant fiscal impact."The President won the most votes of any candidate in American history running on his agenda, and he and his team are fighting for the whole of it every day," said Andrew Bates, a White House spokesperson. "He’s undeterred by the obstruction of lobbyists for big-money interests or Republicans in Congress, and has always said that none of this would be easy." headtopics.com

Trump's New Free Speech Platform Already Has An Awkward Flaw Netflix protesters furious over Chapelle special attack man with 'We like Dave' sign Angelina Jolie: 'It Is a Gift To Be a Woman'

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Pelosi have attempted to tack on immigration reform to that bill, but that effort faced a critical setback earlier this month when the Senate parliamentarian ruled against it. While Democrats are sorting through a “Plan B” to include immigration reform in the social spending plan, the ruling was far more expansive than many in the party expected.

It wasn't Democrats’ only tough reality check this month.Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Tim Scott (R-S.C.), along with Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.)declared an end to bipartisan police reform negotiations, after months of talking but making little progress.

“I'm sad. I think I'm past the point of being frustrated. And now I'm sad,” said Bass. “Because we promised people we were going to improve policing in the United States, and we did not do that.”On voting rights, Democrats will soon undertake what looks like their last, longshot bid for a breakthrough. Schumer has vowed that the Senate will vote on an ethics and election reform bill that amounts to an intraparty compromise between Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and progressives. But the legislation has next to no support from Senate Republicans, let alone the 10 needed to break a filibuster — making final passage impossible without a change to Senate rules.

Progressives have long hoped that the push for the voting rights legislation would be the vehicle for getting rid of the filibuster, but those discussions don’t appear imminent, with some Senate Democrats wanting to delay a conversation about the chamber’s rules until after they wrap up the reconciliation package. headtopics.com

“It’s clear that we have entered a traffic jam where an enormous amount of energy is going to go to reconciliation and the infrastructure framework,” said Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of Indivisible. “The same arms that need to be twisted on this are the same arms that need to be twisted on a lot of this other stuff.”

Other issues are on pause — or at least not front and center — at the moment. Earlier this year, Democrats sought to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour using the so-called reconciliation process, but, like immigration reform, the Senate parliamentarian rejected the proposal. Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), who participated in party discussions on the issue, said Congress could still act but “it’s kind of a moot point “ given that “15 bucks really is irrelevant now because the price of labor is higher.”

Ex-Minneapolis cop faces new sentence in death of 911 caller EXCLUSIVE Indian PM Modi will attend Glasgow climate conference - minister Moscow tightens restrictions as infections, deaths soar

Meanwhile, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said he’s still talking with Senate Republican colleagues about a limited expansion of background checks for buying firearms but acknowledged the discussions are “slow in part because so many other issues have crowded our discussions.”

“There’s no doubt we will have a vote or a series of votes, but it obviously doesn’t feel like it’s happening in the next 30 days,” Murphy said. “It’s still possible and nobody’s walked away from the negotiating table but we probably need to get a little bit more urgency on our discussions."

While Democrats insist that there’s always next year to act on their priorities, privately they recognize that the closer they get to the midterms, the less ability they will have to legislate.“Time doesn’t end at the end of September, and we will continue to go forward. We can live to fight another day on some of those issues,” said Rep. Matt Cartwright (D-Pa.), a co-leader of the House Democrats’ messaging arm. “You have to look for your opening.”

But the angst among some progressives is palpable, particularly in the House where members have watched bill after bill fall to the legislative filibuster.“It’s not just the White House or the Biden administration,” said a visibly frustrated Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), a freshman. “It’s my colleagues in the Senate, the Senate Republicans. It’s all of Congress, man. ”

Read more: POLITICO »

Watch Debby Ryan’s Guide to Depuffing Skin Care and Day-to-Night Makeup

The 28-year-old actress shares her beauty secrets, from her favorite skin-care tools to an effortless smoky eye.

For historical comparison of the last few years read wikipedia's history of jim crow law in the southern states following the civil war and the rise of Nazism in pre world war 2 Germany Those are woman’s issues like menopause. the Dems prove they are just center right ..nothing we didnt know Dear you know it and I know it, the next best thing is to make people disappear. HillaryClinton knows all about it. Let's ask her, shall we? She was top grad in my course entitled, 'How to train to publish favorable articles.' She was on the honor roll!

A bunch of fools! In leadership and can't work together when it matters. We must primary every single sitting democratic member of congress. Let's put in people in that can work together, even if it means losing the house next year. Tax and spend. Rinse and repeat. Yeah this is depressing The filibuster is unconstitutional. It must be abolished. NoOneUnscripted

Pelosi, progressives signal $3.5 trillion spending bill will likely be slimmed'So far, we have not seen any negotiation back from the Senate,' said Rep. Pramila Jayapal, chair of the congressional progressive caucus, as she acknowledged that the bill must be trimmed to reach a consensus. LeaderMcConnell GOPLeader in fact, 97% of our current debt was accrued before POTUS Biden took office. PASS THE CONTINUOUS RESOLUTION The war budget is 8 trillion over the same period. But no, this we can't afford. Thats not what is needed. Both sides need to agree on WHY we need to spend ANY funds NOW. There must be a strategic reason. So far they said: 1. Mitigate 'Recession' (There isnt any--YET). 2. If GOP spent $4T, so can we. 3. 'Big & Early'. Lalalalalalala.

Here's How Joe Manchin's State Stands To Benefit From The Legislation He's BlockingWest Virginia struggles with the exact problems that Biden's spending bill aims to fix. Minchin needs to show some backbone. DINO if there ever was one Manchin will not sign off unless he gets a substantial bribe.

Congress braces for high-stakes week over shutdown, default and infrastructureThe House plans a vote Thursday on the infrastructure bill, while the Senate seeks to fund the government and lift the debt ceiling. Why does this headline not reflect appropriately the situation? Congress will be bracing for a GOP-led government shutdown. Democrats have no intention of shutting down the Government. Republicans have stooped so far as to not even paying the bills they created. Wow!! The 1st infrastructure bill which does real infrastructure is the only one that needs to be passed

Joe Biden, welcome to the thunderdomeWith his economic and domestic policy agenda on the line, Biden needs a big win from his fellow Democrats, whose early unity around his presidency has been strained in recent months come on man!😆 'Nothing is more destructive of respect for the government and the law of the land, than passing laws that are not enforced.' -- Albert Einstein The AMC and GameStop Situation Explained Garbage take. This is just how politics works and Biden is well aware of this.

Pelosi sets Thursday vote on infrastructure, eyes smaller social spending billU.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Sunday set a vote on the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill for Thursday and voiced confidence it would pass.

House Budget Committee votes to pass the $3.5 trillion spending billHouse committee advances Democrats' $3.5 trillion budget deal in a key procedural vote, sending it to the House floor Is there universal healthcare for Americans in there, or just more money to “defense” companies and more weapons for Israel? That goes to nowhere jjj