Democrats are refocusing their efforts to include some pieces of immigration reform in their party-line reconciliation proposal
Privately, they acknowledge that the Senate parliamentarian may have doomed their effort. Publicly, they're floating a new strategy.
One alternate policy that Democrats and advocates are floating is narrowing their horizons on immigration by making a simple change to a decades-old “registry” law, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions. That law allows immigrants to apply for a green card if they arrived in the U.S. before a certain year, and that date was last altered in 1986 to let undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. before 1972 apply for legal status.
Some Democrats say simply updating that law with a more recent year, greatly increasing the number of immigrants eligible to apply for legal status, could pass muster with the Senate parliamentarian."The registry is one possibility," said Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.), noting that the law hasn't been updated since the Reagan era. "We're looking at all different alternatives. We're not giving up."
Menendez confimed his interest in that approach: “We’re not changing the law which was the essence of her arguments that I read in her opinion,” he said. “We are just updating a date.”Including some kind of immigration reform in the party’s social spending package is a major priority for both the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and the far bigger Congressional Progressive Caucus. That roughly 100-member bloc in the House has outlined immigration as one of five priorities that must be in their package to win support on the left. headtopics.com
In the House, at least two Latino Democrats have vowed to oppose the entire package if immigration reform isn’t included. Still, other lawmakers and aides speculated that those Democrats would be forced to soften their threat if the parliamentarian fully rejects the strategy.
One of those Democrats, Rep. Chuy Garcia, reiterated Monday that "immigration reform needs to be a part of reconciliation."The Illinois Democrat also suggested that there could be another option — overruling the parliamentarian, something that Senate Democrats have little appetite for.
"We’d like to exhaust all the avenues before we get to something like that. But we should remember her role is to interpret rules. In the past, the body has overridden the parliamentarian's recommendations," Garcia said.Democrats had argued to the parliamentarian that the budgetary effect of providing permanent legal status to Dreamers, farmworkers, essential workers during the pandemic and those with Temporary Protected Status would be significant enough to include in reconciliation because more people would become eligible for federal benefits. But the parliamentarian concluded that their proposal is "a broad, new immigration policy,” ushering in a societal change that “substantially outweighs the budgetary impact.”
The parliamentarian’s Sunday decision is also likely to renew calls from the left for the Senate to scrap the legislative filibuster, which Senate Democrats don’t currently have the votes to do."We anticipated that this would be very difficult," said Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas). headtopics.com
Asked if there would be calls within the Hispanic Caucus to override the Senate rule official, Escobar said that "we're not there yet."Senate Republicans, meanwhile, praised the parliamentarian. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who is part of a bipartisan working group focused on immigration reform, said Sunday’s decision “dismisses the notion that either party could go it alone” and could motivate Republicans and Democrats to return to the negotiating table on the topic.
The bipartisan working group has met several times, including earlier this summer, but there’s so far little evidence of progress. Senate Republicans have said that they don’t want to address a pathway to citizenship without changes to Biden’s border policy.
When asked whether bipartisan immigration reform was possible this Congress, Tillis offered a wry dose of reality.“Sure," he said. "Every bit as the last 20." Read more: POLITICO »
Auston Matthews is the NHL's must-see superstar
The Maple Leafs center is far from a traditional NHL superstar -- but he might be exactly the kind of star it needs.
NOW they want reform! 😂 God help us, excruciating uncertainty, endless painful waiting. DV2020 GomezvBiden LEGALIMMIGRANTS We can only hope🇺🇸 Years of GOP tax cuts caused: An 8.7% shift in wealth from the 99% working class to the top 1% wealth class. 8.7% = $11.26 Trillion. Biden wants $3.5 Trillion invested in the middle class. Repubs oppose a tax on the 1% to pay for it. Who does the GOP represent? Source: Fed Rsv
Dems have the best intentions but they are shot down and controlled by 2 fake Dems planted by the GOP ...... Perfect way to send it to the trash can. This is a problem that simple US immigration reform cannot fix alone. We need UN involvement & planning. Climate change & wars have people on the move. We must have a multi-national comprehensive plan.
Dems are the last things this country needs to be paying attention to, how about we find a leader ?
Senate parliamentarian deals blow to Dems' immigration pushWASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats can’t use their $3.5 trillion package bolstering social and climate programs to give millions of immigrants a chance to become citizens, the Senate’s parliamentarian said late Sunday, a crushing blow to what was the party’s clearest pathway in years to attaining that long-sought goal. The decision is a blow to what was the party’s clearest pathway in years to attaining its long-sought goal of allowing several categories of immigrants to gain permanent residence and possibly citizenship. The Democrats been trying to hide anything to do with immigration in this massive over spending attempt. Immigration redo needs to stand on its own charlescwcooke Lol. No shit.
Dems vow to go the distance as September problems pile upThe House and Senate return to Washington together this week with Democrats facing four tasks that would be challenging on their own — but, taken together, are the legislative equivalent of Hercules’ labors The difference is one party is in favor of if responsible governing and the other is a party of cult chaos. not like we needed them... to work World War I: 116,516 deaths World War II: 405,399 deaths Vietnam War: 58,220 deaths 580,000 total war deaths while the death count is now 675,233 from the Virus and Florida alone currently 51,240 dead Floridian's and should surpass the Vietnam death toll before the end of 2021!
Lib Dems: Give parents Covid catch-up vouchers to spendSir Ed Davey calls for a fairer deal for carers, parents and business in his conference speech. Including home schoolers, LibDems? 👲
Immigration reform in trouble as progressives urge Dem leaders to ignore Senate Parliamentarian'This ruling by the parliamentarian, is only a recommendation,' said Representative Ilhan Omar. 'Schumer and the White House can and should ignore it.' WTF? I've worked long and hard for the Democratic Party for many years. But I'm worn down by their weak kneed decisions. Only the Denocrats can seize defeat from the jaws of victory. Message to Dems: Read the room. You going after each other while GQP laser-focused on making you irrelevant in ‘22
Senate Parliamentarian Rules Against Path To Citizenship In Democrats' Spending BillThe ruling is a setback for immigration reform advocates working on behalf of the country's nearly 11 million undocumented immigrants. good luck At this point the filibuster is not just unconstitutional but facially detrimental to the preservation of our republic. NoOneUnscripted Someone, please tell these poor immigrants how racist America is because they didn't realize it yet. This is not fair to them.
Democrats blocked from including immigration legalization in spending billSenate Democrats hit a roadblock in their effort to slip an overhaul of U.S. immigration laws into a spending bill that can pass without Republican support, according to a document obtained by NBCNews NBCNews good What kind of sneaky garbage is that? I'm glad it failed, that's not how government needs to function.