Democrats, Body Of Evidence, Lamar Alexander, Republicans, Chief Justice John Roberts, Senate, Witness Testimony

Democrats, Body Of Evidence

Democrats Growing Nervous About Next Week's Vote On Trial Witnesses

Democrats growing nervous about next week's vote on trial witnesses

25.1.2020

Democrats growing nervous about next week's vote on trial witnesses

They're not confident about winning enough Republican support to subpoena witnesses and new documents in the impeachment trial of Donald Trump.

Read full article Igor Bobic January 24, 2020, 8:35 PM UTC WASHINGTON ― Impeachment managers this week have presented an “overwhelming” body of evidence on President Donald Trump’s pressure campaign against Ukraine, but as their opening arguments in Trump’s Senate trial come to a close, Democrats are growing increasingly anxious about winning enough Republican support to subpoena witnesses and other documents. “I’m less confident today than I was last week. I feel like the walls are closing in on Republicans. I don’t understand it. I think they will rue the day they have turned this trial into a cover-up,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said Friday, the final day of presentations by House impeachment managers charging Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of congressional investigations. “I don’t know whether it’s having the same impact on my Republican colleagues as it is on me,” Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), who is friendly with senators on the other side of the aisle, added of the proceedings so far. “I haven’t seen or heard anything to me that suggests significant movement.” In order to subpoena new witnesses in the trial, Democrats need to convince at least four Republican senators to support an initial vote on including additional evidence next week. Three GOP senators have expressed some level of interest in doing so and are considered the likeliest votes in favor: Susan Collins of Maine, Mitt Romney of Utah, and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. Finding at least one more Republican senator to join that effort will be difficult given broad opposition within the GOP to increasing the scope and length of the trial. Republican leaders have warned their members that a subpoena for witness testimony from former national security adviser John Bolton or acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney could mean a protracted legal fight over executive privilege, dragging out the process for weeks or even months. But Democrats maintain a dispute over executive privilege ― which Trump is expected to assert over witness testimony ― could be resolved relatively quickly given that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is presiding over the proceedings. Story continues “If it’s signed, the subpoena, by the chief justice, I think it’ll whip through the courts very, very quickly. Much different than the House situation,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Friday. Still, Republicans are expressing confidence that they’ll prevail next week. Asked Friday how much support there is in his caucus at the moment for calling witnesses, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said, “Not a lot.” The North Carolina Republican, who is facing reelection this year, said that Democrats’ rhetoric about how undeniable the case is against Trump has been “somewhat discounted by how much time they’re spending singing about all the new information they need.” Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) is thought to be one Republican who may be willing to vote in favor of subpoenaing witnesses in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. (Photo: ASSOCIATED PRESS) One possible vote for calling witnesses could be Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, a quiet institutionalist with bipartisan credibility who is retiring this year. Alexander is not close to Trump and doesn’t emulate the president’s rhetoric like some of his colleagues do. But he is a close ally of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), and he has rarely voted against the party line since Trump was inaugurated in 2017 ― save for a vote to revert the president’s national emergency on the border. The Tennessee Republican was one of several senators who pushed for giving the House managers more time to put on their case this week, contrary to the wishes of McConnell and Trump’s defense team. While he has emphasized the need to give the public at least the appearance of a fair trial, Alexander has kept his thoughts about witnesses and evidence to himself, at least for now. “We’ve done a good job of letting the House managers present their case,” Alexander told reporters on Thursday. “The managers have said they’ve offered a mountain of overwhelming evidence, so we have a lot to consider. And I think if the American people are watching, they’ll see the Senate taking this very seriously, allowing a fair trial, and we’ll see what the result is at the end.” Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kansas), who is also retiring this year, was also tight-lipped about the notion of including witnesses and new evidence. “I’m just a juror trying to get all the facts that I can,” Roberts said Friday. The House impeachment team will conclude its case Friday evening, and Trump’s defense team will launch its defense during what is expected to be a short session on Saturday. Following the conclusion of Trump’s defense next week, and a period of questioning by senators from both sides, the Senate will take a vote on whether to consider witnesses and other evidence. Public polling is overwhelmingly on the side of Democrats as they press the need for witnesses. Per a new ABC News/Washington Post released Friday, two-thirds of Americans said the Senate should do so, including 45% of Republicans, and 65% of independents. Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), who observed on Twitter that Republicans looked “ shook ” by the House managers’ closing arguments Thursday, warned that senators who vote against including witnesses would have trouble explaining their vote to the American public. “Anyone who stakes a claim to being reasonable, moderate and open-minded is going to have a devil of a time explaining why this is the only trial in American history to lack witnesses and documents,” Schatz said Friday. “It’s not just that it will lack witnesses and documents, it’s that they’re affirmatively voting to shut it down without getting all of the information.” Related... Read more: Yahoo News

you're gonna want to take another crack at that headline, maybe add the word 'some' or 'two' at the beginning, and then mention the other two Democrats you quoted who don't seem to be nervous at all

Impeachment trial: Republicans steamrolled what may have been Democrats' only chance for witnesses Democrats have acknowledged what may have been their last chance to force subpoenas for witnesses and documents the White House denied to House impeachment investigators has come and gone. There will be documents and witnesses. I can hear the Doobie Brothers, 'Taking It To The Streets' playing in my head. America, it's time to roll. We win even if we lose, we are on a higher moral ground than they will ever be.

Mick Mulvaney becomes top Democratic impeachment target Democrats are zeroing in on Mick Mulvaney as their top demand for witness testimony during President Trump's impeachment trial problem is--i trust (somewhat) that Bolton will tell the truth under oath. I truly don't know if Mulvaney will. Get the documents over the witnesses. Witnesses lie, spin, but the paper trail is much harder to fake. He'll lie anyway.

Chris Coons: How will history remember GOP if they shrug off what Trump did?'If Pres. Trump really hopes to be exonerated, they're going to have to allow some additional witnesses,' Sen. Coons says. 'Simply arguing the Constitution doesn't allow us to impeach someone for this sort of abuse of power ... I don't think holds water' He is about to be exonerated, no matter what the do-nothing Democrats say... I don’t think they care about history. They care about staying it of jail. I don’t see the problem here! Both Democrats and Republicans wants these people to testify, and White House documents made public. Why is the GOP being so difficult about it? Is it really that bad?

Annabella Sciorra testifies in Harvey Weinstein trialActress Annabella Sciorra took the witness stand in the Harvey Weinstein trial. Once again, why didn’t she go straight the the police. I would if someone did that to me.... They should force Weinstein to share a cell with Larry Nassir. I thought tony buried her

Democrats accuse Trump at impeachment trial of corrupt scheme to pressure UkraineIn his two-hour opening argument for the prosecution, Representative Adam Schiff said President Trump had pushed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Joe Biden ImpeachmentTrial livegreenordie Shiff shaming the Senate was a thing of beauty. It shows how the GOP are hollow shells. Just what the oligarchs, American & Russian, like in their Senators Zelenskiy denies this. So Democrats calling Ukraine President a liar.

Democrats launch first salvo at Trump impeachment trial, warn that world is watching'I'm exposing your hatred of this president,' Senator Lindsey Graham criticized Democrats for the way they are handling the impeachment process against Trump Pilot Fish Duh. Lindsay is turning into a very sad shell of a man!



Judge Rules White Girl Will Be Tried As Black Adult

Coronavirus Updates: CDC Announces '4 New Presumptive Cases' In The U.S.

Ronan Farrow Lauds #MeToo After Verdict: 'There Are Harvey Weinsteins Everywhere'

Waiter, there's a fly in my waffle: Belgian researchers try out insect butter

Man Annoyed He No Longer Even Able To Go To Wuhan To Eat Bats Without Mom Freaking Out

US, Taliban set peace signing for America's longest war

Shelling From Royal Caribbean’s M.S. ‘Allure’ Sinks Carnival Cruise Vessel That Crossed Into Disputed Waters

Write Comment

Thank you for your comment.
Please try again later.

Latest News

News

24 January 2020, Friday News

Previous news

'Yappy Hour': Motorworks Brewing in Florida puts shelter dogs on beer cans to help them find forever homes

Next news

US could approve Boeing 737 MAX before mid-year: source
For the first time, there are fewer registered Republicans than independents Opinion | The Democratic field needs to whittle away Sanders, Bloomberg and Buttigieg What Bloomberg’s half-billion dollars in campaign spending would cost you on your budget Trump faces crisis of confidence and competence over coronavirus ‎Planet Money: #975: Reparations In New Zealand on Apple Podcasts The Butcher Shop Keeping Old World Delicacies Alive South Korea Coronavirus Cases Rise as China Touts Recoveries 7 Ways To Become More Mentally Immune And Emotionally Resilient Coronavirus Fears Reverberate Across Global Economy ‘This Land Is Your Land’ Is Still Private Property, Court Rules Democrats make final arguments in South Carolina More than 30,000 pounds of yogurt spilled on New York highway after accident
Judge Rules White Girl Will Be Tried As Black Adult Coronavirus Updates: CDC Announces '4 New Presumptive Cases' In The U.S. Ronan Farrow Lauds #MeToo After Verdict: 'There Are Harvey Weinsteins Everywhere' Waiter, there's a fly in my waffle: Belgian researchers try out insect butter Man Annoyed He No Longer Even Able To Go To Wuhan To Eat Bats Without Mom Freaking Out US, Taliban set peace signing for America's longest war Shelling From Royal Caribbean’s M.S. ‘Allure’ Sinks Carnival Cruise Vessel That Crossed Into Disputed Waters Secret Service Adds Emotional Protection Division To Safeguard Trump’s Psyche New coronavirus case in California is second of unknown origin Lawmakers Press Administration For More Transparency About Coronavirus Response New coronavirus cases in California and Oregon are second and third of unknown origin in US For One Year, This Man Only Ate Food That He Grew Or Foraged And Also General Tso’s Chicken