Those choices include a filibuster carve-out for voting rights or bringing back a talking filibuster.
United States Senator from West VirginiaDemocrats are currently discussing two ways to change the Senate’s filibuster rules in order to pass voting rights legislation. The options under consideration include a special carve-out from filibuster rules for voting rights legislation or the implementation of a new kind of talking filibuster.
The push to enact new voting rights legislation has beenon a collision course with the Senate’s filibuster rulesever since Jan. 6. Democrats won control of the Senate that day with wins announced in both Georgia Senate run-off elections, and supporters of ex-President Donald Trump attacked the U.S. Capitol in an effort to halt the counting of the electoral votes underway at the time.
Democratic control of the Senate gave the party full control of the government for the first time in a decade and the ability to pursue a Democratic agenda, including voting rights. Meanwhile, the insurrection and the election fraud lies spread by ex-President Donald Trump have inspired Republican-run states to enact new restrictions on voting. headtopics.com
While Democrats were already destined to introduce voting rights as the No. 1 priority for legislation in both chambers, Republican reactions to Trump’s lies have made it an urgent necessity to enshrine voting rights in legislation.Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) declared in March that “failure is not an option” on voting rights. “Everything is on the table” to pass a voting rights bill, he added.
Since then, Democrats have seen their first voting rights bill, the For The People Act,blocked by Republican filibusters twicein the Senate after passing the House on a near party-line vote (one Democrat voted no). Those filibusters followed Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) attributing his opposition to the bill to its lack of bipartisan backing, but then announcing he would support a slimmed-down compromise version that he claimed could win Republican support.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) says thatA group of eight members of the Senate Democratic Caucus, Manchin’s compromise bill, on Sept. 14. Manchin is now shopping the bill around to find the Republican support he believes exists.Story continues
But the few Republicans who might be interested, like Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Susan Collins (Maine), have already stated their opposition. A Schumer-promised floor vote on Manchin’s compromise may come as early as next week. Republicans are expected to filibuster Manchin’s bill then. headtopics.com
What comes next is unclear. The only way to pass the bill is for Democrats to change filibuster rules. With a bare 50-vote majority, every Democrat needs to agree to do that. And two senators, Manchin and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.), oppose eliminating or reforming the filibuster.
That hasn’t stopped conversations from happening. According to sources inside and outside of Congress, the options Democrats are currently discussing include a potential carve-out for voting rights from the filibuster rules or the restoration of a talking filibuster.
A carve-out would create a new precedent in Senate rules that legislation on voting rights would not be subject to the chamber’s rules requiring 60 votes to begin or end debate on a bill and move to a final majority vote, a process known as cloture. This is similar to the nuclear option of eliminating the filibuster altogether, but more of a tactical strike.
Such a carve-out would be adoptedthe same way previous filibuster carve-outshave been, as in 2013 for voting on all judicial and executive branch nominees save Supreme Court nominees, and in 2017 for voting on Supreme Court nominees.After the voting rights bill is filibustered, Schumer would make a point of order stating that floor votes on legislation expanding voting rights are not subject to the 60-vote threshold of cloture. The presiding officer, likely Vice President Kamala Harris, could then state that that is not what the Senate Rules say. Schumer would then challenge her ruling, leading to a simple majority floor vote. If 50 senators vote in support of Schumer’s challenge, a new precedent would be created, exempting voting rights legislation from the 60-vote filibuster threshold. headtopics.com
However, while many Democratic senators support such a carve-out, Manchin has rejected the idea,stating, “The filibuster is permanent” on Sept. 14.Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) helped write the Freedom To Vote Act, but has so far opposed filibuster changes that would enable it to pass. (Photo: Tom Williams via Getty Images)
The other option being discussed is to restore a talking filibuster. Until the 1970s, senators had to physically appear in the Senate chamber and continuously speak in order to filibuster a bill. The talking filibuster is perhaps best known for its cinematic portrayal by Jimmy Stewart in the 1939 film “Mr. Smith Goes To Washington,” but, in reality, it was mostly used by white supremacist senators from the South to scuttle anti-lynching and civil and voting rights legislation to protect Black Americans and other minorities.
The Senate ultimately ditched the talking filibuster because senators believed the endless talking took up too much time and inhibited the Senate’s ability to operate in a functional manner. Today, filibuster reformers levy the same complaints of dysfunction at today’s silent filibuster system.
Restoring the talking filibuster would look different from Stewart’s film or the real-life, 24-hour and 18-minute filibuster segregationist Sen. Strom Thurmond waged in 1957 in opposition to a modest civil rights bill, the longest such filibuster by a single senator in history.
Anew talking filibusterwould require a senator or group of senators to continuously speak while also reversing the structure of the existing cloture system. Where today 60 senators must affirmatively vote for cloture to break a filibuster, a new talking filibuster would require the filibusterers to maintain 41 senators on or near the Senate floor for the entirety of the filibuster. If they fail to maintain that number, a vote could be called to break it. This would mean that a minority would need to be fully devoted to blocking a bill and work hard to do so.
This would also align with statements made by Manchin in March about an openness to bringing back the talking filibuster.“If you want to make it a little bit more painful, make him stand there and talk; I’m willing to look at any way we can,” Manchin.
Still, it is unclear if Democrats can convince Manchin or Sinema to budge from their pro-filibuster positions.While conversations within the Senate Democratic Caucus have been ongoing all year, the full-blown discussion is expected to begin after Republicans filibuster the Freedom To Vote Act. Those discussions may stretch into November or later. Only then will we know whether failure wasn’t an option.Read more: Yahoo News »
Auston Matthews is the NHL's must-see superstar
The Maple Leafs center is far from a traditional NHL superstar -- but he might be exactly the kind of star it needs.
Yahoo Get it done. Changing federal election day to a weekend or a national holiday would do more for voter turnout than any new legislation. TheDemocrats VotingRights HouseDemocrats SenateDems Take out the filibuster or leave it. It's sleazy to carve out an exception just to suit your power hungry desires.
House panel slated to advance massive bill Saturday“These next few weeks are going to be critical for this administration,” Rep. Chrissy Houlahan tells smerconish, saying “we have responsibilities … to make sure we deliver on those two bills” as Democrats debate over the $3.5 trillion package. At some point you realise they are mugging you off and how they will treat you in the future. Money looks like leaf in democrats's eyes. USA is going to be defeated ! What is the outcome of the audited votes or ballot?
Germany Embarks On Tricky Search For Post-Merkel GovernmentThe center-left Social Democrats narrowly beat outgoing Chancellor Angela Merkel’s center-right bloc.
Pelosi says infrastructure bill will pass this week, but the vote may be delayedThe speaker of the House added the $3.5 billion reconciliation bill may end up being smaller than expected. Gotta line up those infrastructure trades before passage The Democrats need to stop playing political games and pass the Infrastructure Bill, which was passed and sent to them by the Senate! The American People need the jobs produced by this legislation & we need our Infrastructure fixed! Enough, get on with it!! This bipartisan bill should pass with an overwhelming majority from both parties. All segments of both parties & all states benefit. Anyone not on board is playing political games.
Social Democrats narrowly win German vote, seek to replace Merkel's blocDespite getting its worst-ever result in a federal contest, the Union bloc says it too would reach out to smaller parties to discuss forming a government, while Angela Merkel stays on in a caretaker role until a successor is sworn in.
Social Democrats beat Merkel's bloc in German electionsBERLIN (AP) — Germany's center-left Social Democrats won the biggest share of the vote in a national election Sunday, narrowly beating outgoing Chancellor Angela Merkel ’s center-right Union bloc in a closely fought race that will determine who succeeds the long-time leader at the helm of Europe's biggest economy. Socialism Now! Socialism tomorrow! Socialism forever! Sweet Ugh
Analysis: Biden needs a win — or twoThe marriage between President Biden and the public is on the rocks. Many Democrats believe that his best chance at salvaging it is to enact as much as possible of his two-part, $4 trillion domestic agenda. B S He’s one and done. Highest inflation in 13 years, border crisis, Afghanistan, cyber attacks, rising covid, violent crime across the land…and he dodges press conferences to hide his dementia One and done. Democrats would be wrong. Most of America doesn't want higher gas prices, higher inflation, and higher taxes.