Court Throws Pennsylvania's Mail-In Voting Law Into Doubt

  • 📰 CBS Philly
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 33 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

A statewide court declared Friday Pennsylvania's expansive two-year-old mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, agreeing with challenges by Republicans.

HARRISBURG, Pa. — A statewide court declared Friday that Pennsylvania’s expansive two-year-old mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, agreeing with challenges by Republicans who soured on mail-in voting after then-President Donald Trump began baselessly attacking it as rife with fraud in 2020′s campaign.

Wolf’s office said its appeal means the lower court ruling has no immediate effect, and criticized Republicans as trying to kill the law “in the service of the ‘big lie’” of Trump’s baseless election fraud claims. In Friday’s decision, the three Republican judges agreed with Republican challengers — including 11 Republican lawmakers who actually voted for the law — and ruled that no-excuse mail-in voting is prohibited under the state constitution, until the constitution is changed to allow it.

Those circumstances include being out of town on business, illness, physical disability, election-day duties or religious observance.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Oh come on! 🙄

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 308. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Pennsylvania court tosses state's mail voting lawPennsylvania court strikes down the state’s mail voting law, saying that voters must amend the state constitution before such legislation is legal. This is gonna be appealed, right? Funny because I remember along with CNN and others attacking certain Congress people for pointing out this law was unconstitutional last year. In fact they were accused of being part of the “big lie” simply because they understood how laws should be enacted. Shameful.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Pennsylvania court strikes down expansive mail-in voting lawA statewide court says Pennsylvania’s expansive two-year-old mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, agreeing with challenges by Republicans who soured on mail-in voting. Q: If Act is unconstitutional in PA now, how could unchecked mail-in balloting have been constitutional in the rigged 2020 election there? A: It wasn't. It is unconstitutional. People's vote's aren't being counted. It is a computer 🖥️🖥️🖥️ world now 2022. People vote's should be counted regardless on whom they vote for.
Source: FOX29philly - 🏆 570. / 51 Read more »

Pennsylvania’s vote-by-mail statute ruled unconstitutional by Commonwealth Court; appeals expectedGov. Tom Wolf notes current systems will stay in place while appeal is pending. ....of course it will not stay in place while waiting appeal Not how the law works I am a PA Absentee Voter. I am beyond pissed at this move. They say, I do not reside in PA, I cannot vote. Thing is, I still have to file my Federal Taxes, even though I no longer reside in USA! Make a FEDERAL ABSENTEE MAIL IN VOTING OFFICE, or STOP requiring us to file 1040's!
Source: PennLive - 🏆 463. / 53 Read more »

Potential Biden Supreme Court pick Leondra Kruger known as moderate in CaliforniaBefore she turned to law and became one of the youngest justices ever appointed to the California Supreme Court, Leondra Kruger had journalism in her blood. Looks like a good pick well wait and see Are the picks actually qualified? Were people impressed when they heard them preside over cases. Don't need a black, white or orange Supreme Court Justice. We just need good ones with knowledge of case law, good experience, no strong political ties. It's not complicated so... No, she is not.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Who will Biden appoint to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer?Justice Stephen Breyer will step down from the Supreme Court at the end of the current term, according to people familiar with his thinking. His decision to retire allows President Joe Biden to appoint a successor to one of the three remaining liberal justices. NBC's Peter Alexander discusses who it might be. Anybody who is just qualified please. Hopefully someone extremely liberal . rbg on steroids Smart move will be to select Anita Hill. That will push Thomas to retirement and Boom
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Stephen Breyer and the End of the Apolitical Supreme CourtEven John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett claim to be above partisan politics. But the retiring Stephen Breyer may be the last justice to actually believe it. ed_kilgore writes ed_kilgore Is the US Chamber of Commerce not political?
Source: NYMag - 🏆 111. / 63 Read more »