Court rejects challenge to federal anti-riot law

A Black Lives Matter demonstrator's claim that the 'civil disorder' law is racist fails to scuttle a felony charge.

5/14/2021 6:10:00 AM

Tia Pugh, who smashed a police car window during a protest following George Floyd's death, will face trial next week for violating the 'civil disorder' law — despite criticism of its allegedly racist roots

A Black Lives Matter demonstrator's claim that the 'civil disorder' law is racist fails to scuttle a felony charge.

The University of Alabama football team displays signs as they and fellow athletes from other sports march on campus, supporting the Black Lives Matter movement, Monday, Aug. 31, 2020, in Tuscaloosa, Ala. | Vasha Hunt/AP PhotoBy05/13/2021 10:22 PM EDT

Construction deficiencies behind deadly Mexico City subway collapse, report finds Ex-Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge hospitalized after suffering stroke Jada Pinkett Smith Shares Never-Before-Seen Poem Written By Tupac on His 50th Birthday - E! Online

Link CopiedA federal judge in Alabama has upheld the constitutionality of a half-century-old federal anti-riot law in the face of claims that the law has racist roots and threatens protest activity protected by the First Amendment.U.S. District Court Judge Terry Moorer's decision Thursday afternoon in favor of prosecutors clears the way for Tia Pugh, 22, to face trial next week on a single felony charge: that she violated the "civil disorder" law by smashing a police car window with a bat during a protest in Mobile six days after a Black man, George Floyd, died in the custody of Minneapolis police.

TV news footage captured the raucous demonstration and the moment when the police car window was shatteredLawyers for Pugh challenged the statute on various legal grounds and noted that the provision under which Pugh was charged was termed the "Civil Obedience Act" in what appeared to be a dig at Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and others advocating civil disobedience during the civil rights movement of the 1960s. The motion to dismiss the case was part of what the government termed a coordinated effort by defense attorneys to take aim at the law in cases across the country where it is being wielded against people accused of violence during last year's racial justice protests. headtopics.com

However, Moorer — who was President Donald Trump's first Black appointee to the federal bench — said the law is constitutionally sound. And in rejecting Pugh's claims of selective prosecution and racial bias, he noted that while the statute has rarely been used in the past few decades, it is now being used in dozens of cases related to the storming of the Capitol in January.

"While [civil disorder law] prosecutions may not be common, it is clearly being applied now to a variety of persons — between the few cases that stemmed from the George Floyd protests that turned into civil disorder and more recently the cases asserted against some participants in the events on January 6, 2021 at the U.S. Capitol. Each of the ... prosecutions that arose from those protests encompass individuals of a variety of races and genders with extremely different ideology," the judge wrote.

Moorer's24-page opinionalso turned down a defense argument that the law doesn't square up to federalism principles in the Constitution because it fails to require a sufficiently substantial connection between interstate commerce and the "civil disorder" that is a prerequisite for the federal felony charge.

Still, Pugh will be able to raise a version of that argument at her trial by contending that there is a lack of evidence that the protest she took part in actually disrupted commerce. Prosecutors have said police closed an off-ramp from the interstate during the demonstration and that trucks with hazardous cargoes were told to detour. It is unclear, however, if any actually did. headtopics.com

Nation Begrudgingly Agrees To Learn Devin Booker’s Name Justice Department drops lawsuit over John Bolton book critical of Trump New Yorker mag knocks AG Garland for striving towards 'fairness and neutrality' in cases involving Trump

Pugh's lead attorney, Gordon Armstrong, called the ruling "disappointing, but not entirely unexpected," adding that a ruling in favor of the defense on such issues was more likely to come from an appellate panel than from a trial judge."Now, we turn to the trial and don't look back," the defense attorney said.

The case against Pugh appears likely to become the first to go to trial out of a wave of such cases filed by federal prosecutors across the country after Trump and Attorney General Bill Barrcalled for a federal crackdownand faulted local prosecutors in many jurisdictions for failing to charge demonstrators who got violent. A handful of the federal cases have ended in guilty pleas, but more appear to have been dropped or put on ice in deals that call for the cases to be dropped if defendants stay out of trouble for a set period of time.

Pugh faces up to five years in prison if convicted on the federal felony charge, although defendants are usually sentenced in accordance with federal sentencing guidelines that typically call for much shorter sentences for offenders with little or no criminal record.

In Pugh's case, the U.S. Attorney in Mobile filed the federal charge against her just five days after the incident. Pugh had already been arrested by Mobile police on charges of inciting a riot and criminal mischief.Last month, the Justice Department headtopics.com

sent a prosecutorfrom its headquarters in Washington to Mobile to defend the civil disorder statute. No court has struck it down, but only one federal appeals court has upheld it: the St. Louis-based 8th Circuit in a case involving two men convicted of throwing cherry bombs at firefighters as they tried to extinguish a blaze at the Air Force ROTC building on the Washington University campus.

A conviction of Pugh, followed by an appeal, would allow the Justice Department to seek another vote of confidence for the law from the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit. It is considered one of the nation's most conservative federal appeals courts.The only argument against the statute that seems to have a decent chance of resonating with conservative judges is the claim that the link the law requires to interstate commerce is too weak. However, a win on those grounds is unlikely to affect the use of the law in the Capitol riot cases because they rely on separate language in the statute that covers interference with a "federally-protected function," regardless of any impact on commerce.

Biden Has Now Cancelled $3 Billion Of Student Loans 5 takeaways from the summit between Biden and Putin Analysis: Putin got exactly what he wanted from Biden in Geneva Read more: POLITICO »

Billboard Latin Music Week Returns Live to Miami in September: See the Dates

Billboard Latin Music Week returns live to Miami Sept. 20-25. Here are the details.

Tough. She smashed a police car's window and needs to be held accountable. I understand wat the judge did but come on, who doesn't she she would stand trial? GazzaUnderAttack GazzaUnderAttack GazzaUnderAttack GazzaUnderAttack GazzaUnderAttack SavePalestine savepalestinians SaveSheikhJarrah SaveSheikhJarrah انقذوا_حي_الشيخ_الجراح جرائم_اسرائيلية جرائم_اسرائيلية انقذو_غزه Save_Gaza Gazza_under_attack

I don’t know about that specific law so I’ll refrain on that. But they broke a police car window. That’s a crime.

Olaplex Plans to Appeal Latest Court Decision in L’Oréal LawsuitEarlier this month, a court vacated a $66 million judgement that Olaplex had won against L’Oréal for trade secret misappropriation, breach of a non-disclosure agreement and patent infringemen…

Amazon wins court fight against $303 mln EU tax order, Engie losesAmazon (AMZN.O) on Wednesday won its fight against an EU order to pay about 250 million euros ($303 million) in back taxes to Luxembourg as Europe's second highest court dealt a blow to the bloc's crackdown against unfair tax deals for multinationals.

Opinion | Congressional Democrats’ Court-Picking (Not Packing) SchemeFrom WSJopinion: Congress probably won’t pack the Supreme Court. But a court-picking provision poses a real threat to Americans' rights, writes Alan Gura. opinion yet more drivel from Murdoch land. opinion When the Republicans packed the Supreme Court, they did something much worse than court picking. opinion Wouldn’t more tax cuts for the rich fix this too?

EU court rejects an order for Amazon to pay back $300 million in taxesNormally I don’t do this, I don’t praise people for any reason,truth be told good work deserve appraisal,I wound deny the fact that I’m super jealousy of your hard work and skill. I’m proud of you and what you do in the life of people we need more people like you Sharon_cryptofx NYSE stock merge American stock exchange don't do no more ... Equity linked performance works.. Pays 1-2 years high interest alpha security and stock plans long term shareholder get equity... Securities linked common stock cap returns 10-20% common stock goes up 70% more than cap amount 10-20% pay call term a prize cash dividend at end

War crimes court concerned over violence in West Bank - prosecutorThe International Criminal Court (ICC) is concerned about escalating violence in the West Bank and the possibility that war crimes are being committed there, its prosecutor Fatou Bensouda said on Wednesday. Y is it not concerned over hamas a 'terrorist' outfit firing rockets? Do hamas rockets rain flowers on israelis

Federal court pauses order to offer shelter to everyone on L.A.’s skid row by fallAn appeals court panel temporarily freezes the deadlines of a federal order to offer shelter to everyone on L.A.'s skid row by October.