A rare show of bipartisan unity broke out in Washington Wednesday as Republicans and Democrats on the House Oversight Committee expressed concerns over the rapid spread of facial recognition software used by technology companies.
On the other side of the country, however, Amazon shareholders rejected a proposal that would have urged the company to ensure its technology doesn’t violate civil rights. More than half of Americans are unwittingly part of a facial recognition system, as at least 18 states have agreements with the FBI to share their databases. In each of these cases, state legislatures did not vote to approve the partnerships, Neema Singh Guliani, senior legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said at the hearing.
Joy Buolamwini, a researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, testified Wednesday that Amazon’s software misidentifies dark-skinned women as men 31% of the time. White men in her sample were not misidentified, she said. Committee Chair Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said the issue is personal for him after the ACLU found in 2016 that the Baltimore Police Department used facial recognition software to identify and arrest people protesting the death of Freddie Gray. Cummings was one of those protesters.
caseydarnell_ Zero i debecbgeCoy
caseydarnell_ **Subscribes to Yahoo News alerts
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Amazon shareholders reject facial recognition ban as concern grows in U.S. CongressAmazon.com Inc said shareholders rejected proposals to curb and audit its facial... TV I day by day companies becoming more powerful than governments
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
How Facial Recognition Technology Leads To A Surveillance SocietyIs the alarm about facial recognition technology the social equivalent of a panic attack, or should we “just say no” to this technology?
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Why San Francisco banned the use of facial-recognition technologyThe city will also require government departments to seek approval for technology that watches citizens it will also prevent useful things like finding dangerous criminals. Like Boston marathon bombers
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »
Amazon facing pressure over facial recognition technologyAmazon is holding a high stakes shareholder vote on whether or not to limit some of its cutting edge technology. NBC’s Jacob Ward joins Chris Jansing to break down why the shareholders are trying to hold back their own company because of users’ privacy when they’re offline. Should wait till AFTER ELECTIONS! Russia will be using it !! to Pretend its a person it’s Really NOT to Post Propaganda 😡😡
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Blasting facial-recognition technology, lawmakers urge regulation before it ‘gets out of control’A hearing on Wednesday suggested that opposition to facial recognition technology could be the rare issue progressives and conversatives in Congress. Several members voiced worries about the technology being used here as it is currently is in China, where it contributes to the surveillance state’s systems of public monitoring and social control. Let it run.....and....ignore it...until it finds .. 'FBI most wanted' .. local police most wanted ..escaped criminals ..ppl who overstayed their visa ..non-citizens ( ice/cbs will have pictures of some )
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Amazon’s Sale Of Facial Recognition To Government Has Shareholders ConcernedLiberals are quick to scream racism, but it’s simply a harder technical problem to do any sort of analysis of images where the subject is darker - there’s less information to go on. That’s why I play “wigs and baldyheads with painted faces” everyday. it is evil
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Amazon wins facial-recognition vote, but concerns about the tech aren't going awayHundreds of Amazon employees, groups of investors, and dozens of civil rights groups and academic researchers are upset that the online retailer is selling facial-recognition software to governments. Yet on Wednesday, Amazon shareholders rejected a proposal that asked the company to stop the practice. Liberals calling for the destruction of the United States. without borders, there's no country. How is this not sedition? Or even treason?
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
NYPD used celebrity doppelgängers to fudge facial recognition results, researchers sayThe NYPD abused its facial recognition system by editing suspects' photos ─ and by uploading celebrity lookalikes ─ in an effort to identify people wanted for crimes, a new report says. Great, I’ll just go ahead and avoid New York.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
San Francisco’s ban is just the beginning of a national battle over facial recognition“Our traditional secrecy and lack of transparency has probably come back to haunt us,” the president of the National Police Foundation said. This genie is out of the bag as is most of technology. People 'give' away their privacy daily. The internet just made it possible to 'last' forever. Facial recognition is just another tool to be used. But like many things, it can be abused. But to ban it will only help the guilty Only out in Frisco buddy LouisLittleDone Yeah. Enough with the tech that spies on users already.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »