Column: Sick of Trump? Blame our weak political parties (via latimesopinion)
In previous eras, the long-term good of the party mattered more than individual politicians.
As the Trump campaign flounders under the accumulated weight of the pandemic, the economic crisis, the mass protests, and a Twitter account plugged straight into the president’s limbic system, I wonder: What if the parties mattered?I’m a subscriber to a counterintuitive school of thought popular among some political scientists. Their belief is that partisanship is so strong today because our parties are so weak. Both the Democrats and the Republicans have become incapable of defining and protecting their long-term interests on a time horizon longer than the news cycle.
Prior to the “reforms” of the early 1970s, our democratic system depended in large part on the internally undemocratic nature of the parties. Under the pre-1972 system, independent socialist Bernie Sanders would never have been allowed to run for president as a Democrat and Donald Trump would never have gotten within a hundred miles of the Republican nomination.
Because we live in such an unthinkingly populist time, in which even the president can whine that the “system is rigged” without irony or fear of correction, it’s difficult for many people to grasp how totally democratized the parties have become.Advertisement
Consider two examples. In 1968, then-President Lyndon Johnson beat Eugene McCarthy in the New Hampshire primary, but by such a small margin — a mere 7 points! — that Johnson dropped out of the race. Yes, he wanted to avoid humiliation, but he also believed it was the best way to help his party and his vice president, Hubert Humphrey, the candidate Johnson preferred over McCarthy. McCarthy received 39% of the popular vote in the primaries. Humphrey? Just 2%. Humphrey got the nomination — because the party mattered.
On Aug. 7, 1974, a contingent of Republicans visited President Nixon to explain that, for the good of the party and the country, he should resign. He announced his resignation 24 hours later.Fast forward to today. Right now, things look very bad for Trump. His coalition — which pulled an inside straight in the electoral college but lost the popular vote — has shrunk. In 2016, he won the suburbs by 4 points. In the current race, he’s losing them by 25 points, according to the latest
. His hold on white voters and older voters is eroding, too, though not as dramatically.Of course,he can turn it around. As poll mavens like to say, the polls are just a snapshot. But the funny thing about that snapshot cliché is that people use it almost exclusively to make the point that things can get better. True enough. But they can also get worse. There are plenty of snapshots of the Titanic leaving port in Southampton.
AdvertisementAssume things do get worse for Trump. Maybe the pandemic will run rampant in red states, leaving Trump with the no-win choice of admitting failure or sticking with his wish-it-away strategy, as many core voters literally die off before they even get the chance to prove their patriotism by voting maskless and in person. The economy could tank again. He might even tweet a video of a supporter shouting, “White power!” — whoops, bad example.
Over the weekend, former Trump advisor Sam Nunberg told Politico that if Trump’s standing eroded much further, he’d be facing a landslide electoral college loss and “would need to strongly reconsider whether he wants to continue to run as the Republican presidential nominee.”
Nunberg’s right. But notice what he doesn’t say: that at some point the Republican Party would need to strongly consider throwing him overboard. In a sense it would be a silly thing to say, of course. Because no one thinks of the GOP as an institution capable of such a move. Also, no one but the most Kool-Aid-besotted loyalists think Trump is capable of putting the interests of the party — or nation — above his own.
If Trump were a somewhat normal president under similar circumstances, it would be easy to see Republican candidates breaking with the White House. But partisanship today doesn’t mean mere excessive loyalty to a party and its program. It generally implies a kind of secular faith. And on the right in particular it resembles a Trumpian cult of personality. “Undemocratically” defenestrating Trump for the good of the party would be like the Vatican firing the pope for the good of the church.
Advertisement Read more: Los Angeles Times »
opinion Which of them will become the most unpopular president in history? Ladies and gentlemen, place your bets. What? What do you mean they are closed? Oh, I see. opinion Sick of Democrats? Blame China. opinion opinion 1967/1968 Democratic voters & teens like me protested LBJ. My dad took me to March against LBJ racist draft, I was 16 & more than 200,000 of us chanted HEY HEY HO HO LBJ HAS GOTTA GO HEY HEY LBJ HOW MANY MEN HAVE YOU KILLED TODAY We March against tRUMP
opinion Blame those who Voted! Who Voted? opinion Actually, I’m sick of biased media with an agenda. Who do I blame for that, well besides biased rags like the LA Times et al. I mean. opinion yes. blame yourselves. decades of descending into shit.
‘The Profit’ Host Marcus Lemonis on Bringing Small Businesses Back After Lockdown (Guest Column)For the past decade, I’ve dedicated myself to helping small business owners all across America achieve their dreams of running successful, profitable businesses that serve the communities in which … That’s all fine but did he wear a Rastafarian beanie when he was 17? marcuslemonis Grats on recognition, Marcus. You're a real Sayzr! The Way of a Sayzr includes empowering oneself by empowering others. Stay tuned for more empowerment opportunities... You can learn more about Sayzrs here: marcuslemonis This is the Americans in Business we need bobconfer too 🇺🇸🇺🇸
Column: Is Gilead ripping us off with a COVID-19 treatment topping $3,000?The drug maker says its high price for remdesivir is warranted because hospitalization would cost thousands of dollars more. Davidlaz Obidenshit$59 billion cash payouts Davidlaz About as much as politicians profiting during a pandemic. Davidlaz Lol “IS” ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
An enduring coronavirus mystery: Why do only some get sick?Months into a pandemic that has caused nearly 500,000 deaths worldwide, scientists are still trying to answer crucial questions about the coronavirus. It's a long battle.. Many civilization, villages has strict cleaning practices .. need to adopt those Starting as in India No shoes inside the house n never in kitchen Before sitting you or visitor wash hand, feet, face Shower twice or thrice as needed Hand wash before food Start with those vaccinated against TB. The contrast between Portugal and Spain could give important answers. Because they have underlying health conditions. Like many of the elderly in nursing homes.
New Yorkers who visit high-risk states will lose paid COVID-19 sick leave - Business InsiderBusiness Insider is a fast-growing business site with deep financial, media, tech, and other industry verticals. Launched in 2007, the site is now the largest business news site on the web. Wow Make sense.
Maurkice Pouncey's Sick Waterfront Florida MansionMaurkice Pouncey's Sick Waterfront Florida Mansion. You Gotta See This Pace! Who is he? Talk about oppression *place
88 People Got Sick With The Coronavirus From One Bar Reopening In Michigan'More and more businesses that definitely don't want to close again need to understand that they are our biggest enforcement army right now.' Did any die bc if it? Who cares if they got it?