When this kind of stuff is released in the middle of an investigation mueller has to say something . .. don’t want that evidence disappearing .
The SC didn’t mince words: they stated the report was inaccurate!!! The sources cited also confirmed they were never contacted! It’s an irresponsible act and almost criminal!!! The msm make things up as they go
Dispute? Why can't you intellectually honest? Mueller's office debunked it. Where have your journalistic ethics and objectivity gone?
So they lied and concocted a false story to give cnn and impeachment zealous media program material for a day...got it.
What's funny is Trump tweets all of a sudden he believes Muller. LOL the OSC only said it was inaccurate not false.
Deemed false. That's the problem with tweeting without verification.
Don’t be too quick to discount Buzzfeed. Its the triggering over single missteps that gives the cynics the ammunition to scream “fake news” at every fact they don’t like. Buzfeed deserve the opportunity to correct, retract or apologize.
So what’s the truth then?
oh i see your sticking with buzzfeed , Mueller said it was not true ,
Let's see how much love Trump and Fox News heaps on Mueller now.
You jumped on it like all the sleazy media. I expect better of you. On an earlier tweet, I questioned your reporting with Buzzfeed as the source.
So he had to say that to get the heat off of Cohen so he would actually testify to Congress next month right ?
trump
Whether this is true or not does not matter. It's just a political issue. The same is true of Muller's investigation of Trump.
Wrong again, . They disputed some details, not the report. BTW, the White House didn’t fully deny the report, a fact that even Fox News reported.
NPR = 'Fake News', now I can't listen to them either.....
so what you reported earlier, without bothering to confirm the story, was untrue. in other words, gossip. you report gossip as if it were news.
Time to fire the ignorant hack who spread the lies FireHerNow
Once again using the word disputing they did not use the word dispute or deny the accusation they said not accurate so could some of it be accurate parts of it be accurate if you're going to deny it say denied
Shit, I was just finishing their poll about what type of pizza I am. Fake news at its best.
Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed story about Trump directing Cohen's false testimony Question is who’s passing out the TDS medicine to Dems and Media, they need to increase doses This is terrible the fake news, special Prosecutor office just said story was not TRUE..
BuzzFeed doesn’t even register on my list of credible source. Why would reputable news agency jump on one of their stories. Oh, that’s right, ratings.
I mean it’s buzzfeed what did you expect?
So what? He is a liar. NPR eats this shit up though.
Mueller might finally be sick of these delusional left in the media. You have the same credibility as the Soviet era Pravda newspaper
Buzzfeed is trash
You are sourcing Buzzfeed?!?!? A blog....known to have both manipulated the media and been manipulated. But on the plus side, if this is crap, you can point at Buzzfeed and Buzzfeed can issue a week retraction at the bottom of the story after getting all the clicks. New low NPR.
Lordy...
WTF? 'Disputing?' SpecialCounsel clearly is DEBUNKING the BuzzFeed story. Be honest for once in NPR's coverage of POTUS. Quit being the 'enemy of truth.' The dossier upon which counter-intelligence & special counsel investigation based, released by BuzzFeed, is also FAKE.
I wonder what CNN’s gonna say🤔
This is strategically a brilliant move by Mueller’s team on many levels. He not only shuts down an accusation as inaccurate, but his passed silence now lends credibility to other more reputable news outlets. He also indicates to Trump that this is far from a witch hunt. Mueller
How much of the sources were in Mueller's team, how many in SDNY office?
*Special Council
Two keys points here seem to be: 1) TRUMP AND WH DID NOT DENY TRUMP DIRECTED COHEN TO LIE. And 2) statement from Mueller's office says 'description' and 'characterization' are 'not accurate.' That is ambiguous and not synonymous with 'false.' 🤔
Me on February 7th
Damn you just ruined all of the liberal’s days
where are all the smart ASS democrat's who hours ago saying we have him now!
Oddly enough, having Rudy's speak up makes me think it's all true. Otherwise I would wait and see.
Your organization should be ashamed to jump on a tabloid scoop. Shameful.
Maybe he texted the request or email?
Who is the spokesperson?
Just imagine how much better the world would be if American journalists got their jobs based on merit rather than who their parents are friends with.
More FakeNews
I hope those extra clicks were worth it, Buzzfeed.
How about justice for something that we do know happened? When will Bush and Obama be brought to justice for their illegal wars that killed 100s of 1000s of innocent people, destroyed several countries, and created the Mediterranean refugee crisis?
lmaoooooooooooooo
This is why we need Mueller to finish his report and get it out
BuzzFeedNews
Unfortunate. Now Trump's Saturday announcement is going to be even more nauseating.
No. Not disputed in its entirety.
This means they have better dirt and are not quite ready to blow the president up quite yet. Encouraging news indeed.
And they waited 24 hours why? Looks like they’re just saying that they don’t leak.
'Not Accurate' is VERY DIFFERENT from 'Not True . . . '
It seems to me that the Special Counsels office is just saying the leaks didn't come from them.
Hahaha
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Source: BuzzFeed - 🏆 730. / 51 Read more »