. The actor has requested a review of a California appellate court's ruling to disqualify the private judge he and Jolie chose to oversee their custody dispute, ET confirms. , vacating all of his decisions, including a previous ruling that granted Pitt more time with his and Jolie's five minor children.
Attorneys for Jolie previously argued that Ouderkirk, who had been the former couple's private judge, could be biased in his rulings. Ouderkirk was hired in 2016, and his employment was extended twice during Pitt and Jolie's five-year custody battle. "Mr. Pitt's counsel's petition to the California Supreme Court displays how they are clinging to this private judge who exhibited bias and refused statutorily required evidence. It is disturbing that in full knowledge of unethical behavior, and having previously failed to disclose their new and ongoing financial relationships with him, Mr. Pitt’s counsel would seek to reinstate the private judge," the statement continued."Ms. Jolie hopes Mr.
Custody! Aren’t her kids all grown? Is she just dragging this out for the sake of it to be petty? I think so. Ugh can’t stand her
This woman should stick to listening to the experts she hired to look after her children's well-being. Every single one testified on Brad's behalf that the kids should be with him more. It's clear this is no longer about protecting the children
even if this petition doesn't work, I'm glad Brad filed this. He's completely right. AJ is manipulating the court system to disqualify a perfectly competent judge over behavior she knew about for over two years. Only complained bc she was losing.A ridiculous abuse of legal system
Really 😏
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: etnow - 🏆 696. / 51 Read more »
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »