Bloomberg again says he 'inherited' stop and frisk and argued he cut it by 95% while he served as mayor of New York City. Earlier this month, HuffPost's letsgomathias wrote about NYC activists who recall a much different story. DemDebate
The Democratic presidential candidate also made the dubious claim that he cut stop and frisk by '95%' during his time as mayor.
Jeffrey Fagan, a criminologist at Columbia University who published an in-depth study of stop and frisk,notedthat while Bloomberg claimed to have “inherited” the police practice, stops actually “ballooned” during his time as mayor, from 92,000 stops in 2002 to nearly 700,000 in 2011.
“So, he took a policy in place and vastly and enthusiastically expanded it during his regime,” Fagan wrote in a tweet.Alyssa Aguilera, spokesperson for theCommunities United for Police Reform Action Fund, told HuffPost in a statement that “contrary to Bloomberg’s claims that he ‘cut back’ stop-and-frisk,” it was actually local activists who “forced the historic reduction in abusive stops.”
And Christopher Dunn, a lawyer at the New York Civil Liberties Union, shared that analysis,telling Gothamistthat Bloomberg’s statement was “completely misleading.”“It is true that the very end of his administration that stops went way down, but that undoubtedly was a product of all the advocacy and litigation that was taking place,” Dunn said. “He does not get credit for that, and it’s notable that he did not try to take credit for it at the time.”
Bloomberg, a Republican-turned-Democratic billionaire who recently launched a largely self-funded White House run, has struggled to distance himself from a series of aggressive and discriminatory policing policies he oversaw as a three-term mayor of New York City.
His misleading statement Tuesday came in response to outrage over arecently resurfaced audio clipin which he can be heard defending his stop-and-frisk regimen in stark, racist terms.“People say, ‘Oh, my God, you are arresting kids for marijuana who are all minorities,’” Bloomberg says in the
audio recordingfrom a 2015 Q&A at The Aspen Institute. “Yes, that’s true. Why? Because we put all the cops in the minority neighborhoods. Yes, that’s true. Why’d we do it? Because that’s where all the crime is. And the way you should get the guns out of the kids’ hands is throw them against the wall and frisk them.”
Prominent figures on the left and right of the political spectrum criticized Bloomberg over the comments. Even President Donald Trump, astop-and-frisk supporterhimself, tweeted: “WOW, BLOOMBERG IS A TOTAL RACIST!” (The president later deleted the tweet.)
“I inherited the police practice of stop-and-frisk, and as part of our effort to stop gun violence it was overused,” Bloomberg said in his statement Tuesday. “By the time I left office, I cut it back by 95%, but I should’ve done it faster and sooner. I regret that and I have apologized — and I have taken responsibility for taking too long to understand the impact it had on Black and Latino communities.”
In a series of emails with HuffPost, a Bloomberg campaign spokesperson did not specify precisely the exact time frame it used to calculate this alleged “95%” drop.Donna Lieberman, executive director at the NYCLU, speculated to HuffPost that the Bloomberg campaign selectively sliced and diced
stop-and-frisk datato its own advantage, comparing the number of police stops at their peak during his mayorship (about 204,000 stops in the first quarter of 2012) to the number of stops at their lowest (12,500 stops in the fourth quarter of 2013).But experts and activists say this narrow reading of the data obscures larger trends.
“His ’95% decline’ figure is nonsense,” wrote Fagan, the Columbia University criminologist. “Stops declined by 72% from the 2011 peak to 2013, his last year. Stops increased overall 98% from 2002-2013.”Fagan added that Bloomberg only “brought down the number of stops due to pressures from the federal district court in a series of court orders beginning in May 2012 and continuing through August 2013,” when a federal judge
that the city’s use of stop and frisk was unconstitutional and amounted to racial profiling. Read more: HuffPost »
letsgomathias Mathias is right. Bloomberg has become more dishonest since becoming a politician. I have that post bookmarked btw. Always thought he’d throw in for 2020. Nice job. letsgomathias F ing A ... MikeBloomberg backed LindseyGrahamSC in Lindsey’s last election? Yeah. That’s all I need to know. 5 minutes ago, I was voting for Mike. Sure as hell won’t now. Mike has Lindsey’s stench all over him.
letsgomathias Seems like the sort of thing that would be documented, why are we quoting people’s recollections?
Warren Buffett says he’d ‘certainly vote for Mike Bloomberg as opposed to Sanders’Billionaire investor Warren Buffett says he agrees with Democratic front-runner Bernie Sanders on some issues but disagrees on a number of others. Given a choice, Buffett says he’d vote for former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg over the Vermont senator in the race for the nomination. I mean... Obviously. It’s the Billionaire Boys club
Warren Buffett says 'I'm a Democrat,' and would have 'no trouble' voting for BloombergWarren Buffett, the chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc and one of the world&039... Also, too, duh, as well.
Warren Buffett says 'I'm a Democrat,' and would have 'no trouble' voting for BloombergSpeaking on CNBC television, Buffett also said he agreed with some positions of Bernie Sanders, who is looking to cement his front-runner status in the U.S. Democratic presidential race. "I&39;m a Democrat, but I&39;m not a card-carrying Democrat," said Buffett, who said he has sometimes Este viejo debe ser otro ricachón más
Trump says coronavirus 'very well under control' in USAt the same time, the Trump administration on Monday asked Congress for an additional $2.5 billion to prepare in case of a widespread outbreak and to assist other nations. In earlier remarks Tuesday, Trump said he wants the additional $2.5 billion to shore up defenses “in case something should happen
Kudlow says he's not expecting the Fed to make a 'panic move' and cut interest ratesLarry Kudlow has a history of saying things that turn out not to be the truth. He has zero credibility! I wish they would! People's retirements are being ruined in 2 days!! I’m done with CNBC screaming fire in a crowded theater
Trump says coronavirus 'under control' in US, problem going to 'go away'Secretary of State Pompeo accuses the governments of China and Iran of censoring information about the coronavirus outbreaks in their countries, saying “censorship” can have “deadly consequences.” Like they care? how is the Senate's classified coronavirus briefing this morning any different? 🤣🤣THIS criminal talking about censorship if just fabulous