The Senate’s $550 billion infrastructure deal is a paradox for President Joe Biden, who has called for historic, transformative legislation while pledging to show he can bring a polarized Washington together.
The result is a paradox for Biden, who has called for historic, transformative legislation while pledging to show he can bring a polarized Washington together. In this case, he couldn’t do both. But highways would remain the king of the road in Congress’ transportation spending priorities. The deal also omits policy language from a House-passed bill that DeFazio championed, which would have limited the ability of state transportation departments to build new highways or widen existing ones.
“It isn't about the amount. It is about what you want to accomplish,” said Beth Osborne, director of the progressive group Transportation for America.
For one thing, a third of the rail money is not guaranteed — it’s subject to Congress’ annual appropriations whims, and therefore could fail to arrive if Republicans take one or both chambers of Congress. The bill also doesn’t include some deeper policy changes that Amtrak had endorsed, such as one that would have given passenger rail services more leverage over freight railroads for access to tracks — a key to ensuring better on-time performance.
But that’s a fraction of the $45 billion that the White House initially called for to accomplish its signature goal. It’s also That hasn’t stopped the White House, as recently as last week, from proclaiming that the bipartisan bill “will put plumbers and pipefitters to work replacing all of the nation’s lead water pipes so every child and every American can turn on the faucet at home or school and drink clean water.”“We’re seeing a lot of spin out of the White House, which is just unbelievable,” he said on a call with reporters last week, noting that $15 billion “of course would not replace all the lead pipes.
That gives ISPs a lot of leeway to give short shrift to poorer and minority communities, fairness advocates argue — even as they celebrate the fact that Congress is willing to admit that digital redlining exists. The proposal would mimic reporting rules triggered when investors sell stocks and their brokers are then required to report the information to help determine tax bills.
Seeing how most of the country depends on highways and roads it’s common sense that most of the money should go there. Once again dems only think about their lib cities as if the rest of the country doesn’t exist
Pass the bill. Stay united.
Who can read the damn thing? It’s more than 2000 pgs long! I’d love to hear how much is going to green energy, which, duh, is Infrastructure. And I’d really like to know how much PORK is in this thing, buried somewhere. Count this liberal among the enraged. Horrific governing.
…don’t hold this administration responsible for what you didn’t hold rump’s 🧻for…
Look at government working and getting things done like it hasn’t in 4 years.
You dont always get everything you want. Maturity is required here.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Source: TODAYshow - 🏆 389. / 55 Read more »