Antibody Tests May Answer Public Health Questions

  • 📰 WebMD
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 60 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 51%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Some employers are using antibody tests, also known as serological tests, to decide which employees may return to work or work on the frontlines, but are they accurate enough to be a good measure of safety?

. Some test developers have falsely claimed their serological tests are FDA approved or authorized. Others have falsely claimed that their tests can diagnose COVID-19 or that they are for at-home testing, which would fall outside of the policies outlined in our March 16 guidance, as well as the updated guidance,” Anand Shah, MD, FDA deputy commissioner for Medical and Scientific Affairs, and Jeff Shuren, MD, FDA director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said on the agency’s website.

The manufacturers of the 12 antibody tests that the FDA has authorized for emergency include big commercial laboratories and medical device manufacturers like Abbott and Roche as well as Mount Sinai Hospital Clinical Laboratory and Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health.and is adding the results from the independent validation performed by other federal agencies including the National Cancer Institute as they become available, according to an FDA spokesperson.

Mina says the timing of antibody testing is important. It takes about 1 to 3 weeks after someone becomes infected with SARS-CoV-2 for their body to make antibodies, and some people may take longer. The FDA and some health care providers recommend a second test for confirmation. “The result of a single antibody test is not likely to be sufficiently accurate to make an informed decision regarding whether or not an individual has had a prior infection or truly has antibodies to the virus. A second test, typically one assessing for the presence of antibodies to a different viral protein, generally would be needed to increase the accuracy of the overall testing results,” says the FDA.

Source: News Formal (newsformal.com)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 709. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Antibody Tests and Accuracy Issues Leave Some Americans With More Questions Than AnswersArmed with positive antibody tests for Covid-19 and a history of related symptoms, some Americans think they had the disease before it was identified in the U.S. in January. Hypochondriacs say what? they dumb
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Frequently Asked QuestionsSmoking cigarettes is known to cause heart & lung disease. People with underlying heart & lung problems may have increased risk for serious complications from COVID19. There has never been a better time to quit smoking with help from FDATobacco: Surgeon_General FDATobacco Bruh you are so ‘ general ‘ really! Surgeon_General FDATobacco Do it because it stinks.
Source: HHSGov - 🏆 147. / 63 Read more »

Dr Alex gets coronavirus antibody test after months working on NHS frontlineLove Island's Dr Alex George documented the moment he took a coronavirus antibody test as he works on the NHS frontline
Source: Mirror Celeb - 🏆 476. / 51 Read more »

CDC Says Possibly 'Less Than Half' Of Positive Antibody Tests Are CorrectThe CDC has acknowledged that antibody tests used to determine if people have previously been infected with Covid-19 are not accurate enough to guide important policy decisions. Okay enough of the bs Everyone backToWork So now we can start going back to normal? This means that possibly more than half of them are correct. Possibly it means most of them are correct. Possibly it means virtually all of them are correct. It actually doesn't mean a single thing. Which is what we're coming to expect from the CDC.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Eli Lilly starts human study of a potential coronavirus treatmentEli Lilly said on Monday patients have been dosed to test its potential antibody treatment designed to fight COVID-19, caused by the new coronavirus. Which execs have stock to unload? Perfect timing Oh shit forgot there’s a pandemic
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

We Wasted Our Chance for a Quick Economic RecoveryNew data show that the relief effort worked—but we bungled the public health part. It tells us that the damn minimum wage should have been raised a long time ago People with higher wages were less likely to lose jobs skewing the numbers?
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »