Abortion Media Coverage Is 'Deeply, and Problematically, Politicized' Says Study

78% of Americans support abortion, in at least some circumstances—but you wouldn't know that from mainstream media coverage.

7/5/2020 1:53:00 AM

78% of Americans support abortion, in at least some circumstances—but you wouldn't know that from mainstream media coverage.

A woman’s right to choose is under siege—which is why it is important to critically examine how the media covers it. A new report from NARAL Pro-Choice America and Global Strategy Group (GSG) found most abortion coverage in mainstream media to be “deeply, and problematically, politicized.”

Yet only 9 percent of articles mentioned this broad support. “There is such a widespread societal conception that this is a highly polarizing issue,” said Ford. “It becomes sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy, because people think it’s that, so they report it that way. And as people read it, they continue to believe it as that way.”

Trump signs 4 executive actions on coronavirus relief Which Upcoming K-Pop EP/LP Are You Most Excited for This Year? Vote! Trump signs coronavirus relief orders after talks with Congress break down

Abortion is almost always covered as a political issue. Overwhelmingly, NARAL found that abortion is treated as a political matter, rather than a health care matter. The analysis found that many articles relied heavily on political rhetoric and rarely contextualized content with scientific research, physician’s voices or real-life abortion stories.

Here at Ms., our team is continuing to report through this global health crisis—doing what we can to keep you informed and up-to-date on some of the most underreported issues of this pandemic. We ask that you consider supporting our work to bring you substantive, unique reporting

—we can’t do it without you.Support our independent reporting and truth-telling for as little as $5 per month.Abortion coverage spikes around legislation and litigation, and NARAL found that more than 77 percent of articles about abortion were written by political, legal, breaking news or general assignment writers—rather than health reporters.

This matters because political writers arethree times less likelyto reference a physician andfour times less likelyto include medical research than health writers. Overwhelmingly, abortion is treated as a political matter, rather than a health care matter. (

/ Flickr)Reporters use misleading anti-choice rhetoric without explanation.The hyper-politicization of abortion extends to the language reporters use, which is widely tinged with anti-abortion inflammatory rhetoric. When reporters employ such terms, they often present them neutrally, without explaining their role as deliberate disinformation.

More than half of articles analyzed included emotionally-charged anti-choice rhetoric—using phrases such as “heartbeat bills” and “infanticide”—without addressing theirmedical inaccuracy.Additionally, writers tend to include quotes from pro-choice activists and anti-abortion extremists to define terms, portraying straightforward questions of truth and fiction as a matter of political opinion.

After a White man repeatedly erased girl's 'Black Lives Matter' chalk drawing in front of her home, neighbors stepped in to show support High school student forced to take off Black Lives Matter mask at graduation ceremony, family says Protesters decry government's anti-LGBT attitudes in Poland

Abortion coverage often lacks expert voices.Reporters rarely ground their coverage in the science of abortion. Mainstream articles seldom reference medical research, and they largely fail to include those most directly affected by abortion: medical professionals and women.

Just 13.5 percent of articles analyzed quoted a physician, and only 8 percent referenced the lived experience of someone who has had an abortion.This lack of input is particularly alarming because mainstream abortion coverage is rife with false and misleading medical information. For example, many reports reference “

” that seek to limit the right to an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy.Without context, readers might not understand such bills would prohibit legal abortionbeforemany women even know they are pregnant—a key fact included in only 27 out of 91 articles mentioning “heartbeat” restrictions. Consulting medical experts and people who have had abortions would combat this disinformation.

Abortion coverage uses polarizing language.Language used in articles reviewed reinforces perceptions of abortion as a highly controversial issue. NARAL found that 17 percent of articles described abortion as “divisive,” and many articles included words such as “extreme,” “extremist,” “radical” and “fringe” to characterize pro-choice politicians and voters and anti-abortion policies. 

Reporters can do better. Here’s how.The study offers several recommendations for reporters for writers to improve their coverage of abortion. NARAL suggests writers avoid using inflammatory anti-choice rhetoric without providing proper context, consult medical experts, and base pieces in the understanding that pro-choice policies enjoy majority support.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, writers should include the real-life stories of people who have had abortions—those who ultimately bear the consequences of their reporting. The decision to terminate a pregnancy is highly personal. Yet in mainstream news coverage, reproductive rights are often reduced to political episodes, detached from their real-world implications. 

Velshi: American capitalism exploits the poor to enrich the wealthy Michelle Obama, Bernie Sanders and John Kasich expected to join forces for first night of Democratic convention Pulse shooting survivor applauds NY AG suing to dissolve NRA

“Thinking about the people behind the words and behind the rhetoric is especially important,” said Ford. “This issue is so important for people to determine their futures.”In an country where the right to safe and legal abortion is rarely secure, NARAL’s report sheds light on the humanity behind this hot-button topic.

The coronavirus pandemic and the response by federal, state and local authorities is fast-moving. During this time, Ms Read more: Ms. Magazine »

Trump signs coronavirus relief orders after talks with Congress break down

President Donald Trump signed executive orders on Saturday partly restoring enhanced unemployment payments to the tens of millions of Americans who lost jobs in the coronavirus pandemic, as the United States marked a grim milestone of 5 million cases.

You all got a giant target on your backs! I'm talking about millions of Rosaries are being said against you. You are doomed.

Meet The Marketer: Maria Gräfin Von Scheel-Plessen, Global Head Of Media And Advertising At MontblancMaria Gräfin von Scheel-Plessen is the Global Media Manager at German luxury brand Montblanc. With her background in digital, she’s driving the brand into the future at scale. Here’s how she stays productive no matter the challenges ahead: Now this is interesting. Nah, she must be some president's daughter or something... Like that American blonde...what was her name...

The Fashion, Beauty and Media Brands Pulling Ads from FacebookMajor brands are pulling their advertising from the social media platform as part of the “Stop Hate For Profit” campaign.

L.A. public radio station KCRW secures first pay deal amid media unionizing waveAfter nearly a year of talks, public radio station KCRW has agreed to its first pay deal in the latest in a wave of unionizations. Awesome they’re unionizing! SAG is pretty soft in bargaining recently imo.

Social media to face EU broadcasting rules on harmful contentThe non-binding guidelines apply to social platforms where audiovisual content is seen as an essential. EU countries have until September 19 to implement the rules.

Drag Race's RuPaul deletes all his social media accounts worrying fansFans of the Drag Race host were left scratching their heads after he wiped his Instagram and deleted his Twitter profile which had and more than 1 million followers

Trump, Biden fight for primacy on social media platformsOn an average day, President Donald Trump sends about 14 posts to the 28 million Facebook followers of his campaign account. The numbers are similarly skewed in other spheres of the social media landscape. The president has spent years cultivating a ragtag digital “army” of meme makers and political Imagine sending out 14 fascist post out every day while ignoring American soldiers with a bounty on their head. Then imagine defending Putin over American soldiers. That's your choice Americans. and don't even mention Twitter. Joe Biden has dementia.