Null / ©Walt Disney Co./courtesy Everett / Everett Collection
"I've seen a lot of people talking about how the Soul Stone works to preserve souls, and how you can exchange a soul for a soul as a possibility for why Natasha might be brought back eventually, but I think it's actually more simple than that: I don't think Captain America ever went back to 'return' the Soul Stone. How could he? What was he going to do — toss it off the cliff? If the idea was to limit disruption to the alternate timeline, that wouldn't work. When Thanos got there in the other timeline, he would just find a stone and wouldn't need to sacrifice Gamora. He could just profit off Black Widow's sacrifice. This would completely screw up all kinds of things going forward in that timeline.
We know that when a timeline is changed by removing an infinity stone, it creates a parallel one without the associated infinity stone. We know that returning the stone will return the reality back to the main timeline, or effectively stop it from branching at all. This was explained by the Ancient One and Banner.
SqueakyElvis Thanks for making the post unreadable thanks to that stupid oversized advert you goons I was enjoying that post until then Mr Presley 😸 SqueakyElvis
I was referred to this platform by a friend online and I thought it was a scam...but I was moved to try and yes I did earned....I just want to use the opportunity to share this to people to know how Miss shantelll_142 platform works...her good deed need a recommendation
shantelll_142 has all it takes to turn things well for you with her company platform and strategy on Bitcoin trade and other Crypto currencies..invest with her shantelll_142 and you will have a good return of your investment
Fan theory: how fast they spin determines how much wind they produce!!!
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: BuzzFeed - 🏆 730. / 51 Read more »
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Source: Mirror Celeb - 🏆 476. / 51 Read more »
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »