Trump's Supreme Court move: Distraction attempt or autocratic assault on democracy?

  • 📰 SkyNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 64 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Qulity Score:
  • News: 29%
  • Publisher: 67%

Amy Coney Barrett will bring change to the court and country but what other motives might Donald Trump have?

United Kingdom Headlines News

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

The career record of the federal appellate judge demonstrates conservative credentials on contentious issues like gun control, immigration and access to medical care. A devout Catholic, she is lauded by anti-abortionists for her pro-life convictions."The dogma lives loudly within you," is a slogan famously associated with Ms Barrett.

It catapulted Ms Barrett to wider national prominence and stirred religious conservatives who viewed the episode as an example of anti-religion bias.Ms Barrett will have a lifetime's appointment to a right-wing bench with which to wield influence over generations who don't necessarily share her politics or life choices.

Vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris was among those who claimed that Amy Coney Barrett's presence on the Supreme Court would threaten a woman's right to abortion in the US, tweeting:"They intend to destroy the affordable care act and overturn Roe . This selection would move the court further right for a generation and harm millions of Americans. I strongly oppose Judge Barrett's nomination.

Opinion polls indicate that most members of the public believe a replacement Supreme Court justice should wait until after the election.A confirmation hearing is due to start on 12 October before the Senate Judiciary Committee and Republicans believe they have the numbers in the bag to wave her through in a vote on the Senate floor before election day on 3 November.

Therein lies a concern for Donald Trump's opponents. They sense he is scripting a stitch-up around his Supreme Court nominee.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 35. in UK
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

jamesmatthewsky OR US President just following due Constitutional process OR woke, out of touch sky journalist giving his opinion💤💤

Another pro left headline again . Great appointment, the last thing america needs right now is a democrat with crazy left views. Trump is the best person for America

Sky really is a shit show.

Autocratic assault on democracy - Do you lot at Sky News can get any more pathetic than that?

Doing the job he was elected to do.

How about doing his job?

Trying to outdo Soapy Sopel in the petulance stakes?

Seriously? , Article 2, Section2 of our constitution is not a 'distraction' neither is it an 'autocratic assault'. By the way we are a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC

Why don't you try Constitutional Duty as President of the Republic was carried out smartly......We are a Republic over here in this EX-British Colony. Look up 1776 and War of 1812. Our Government is different and Unique. Take that you Limeys!

Why does bLM Glorify and support violent criminals,Child Rapists and ghetto Gang Bangers when they are supposed to protest THE COUNTLESS CHILDREN AND INFANTS THEY SLAUGHTER IN THE STREET EVERYDAY!, Shooting OVER 30+ people EVERY WEEKEND,Crack wars,drive by's . DISGUSTING DISGRACE

ScumMedia

Awwwww poor lefty scum Sky News. Are you getting angry because things aren’t going your way in another county?

Neither. It's the Constitutional obligation.

01_The Destruction of Jerusalem - Great Controversy (1911) Ellen G. White

01_The Destruction of Jerusalem - Great Controversy (1911) Ellen G. White

01_The Destruction of Jerusalem - Great Controversy (1911) Ellen G. White

01_The Destruction of Jerusalem - Great Controversy (1911) Ellen G. White

Under the US Constitution (Article11) the President has plenary power to nominate a Supreme Court judge, and the Senate then considers the nomination. Constitutionally pretty straighforward unless you're SkyNews when it becomes potentially autocratic and anti democratic.

01_The Destruction of Jerusalem - Great Controversy (1911) Ellen G. White

01_The Destruction of Jerusalem - Great Controversy (1911) Ellen G. White

01_The Destruction of Jerusalem - Great Controversy (1911) Ellen G. White

There is literally nothing anti-constitutional, illegal, or illicit in this nomination. The Dems are quivering with rage because (a) a woman was appointed that (b) among other things, is pro life and is (c) not a racist. WalkAwayFromDemocrats

It’s constitutional, so far from either

Could always be a good old fashioned attempt to ensure pragmatic justice for all should the gullible vote for the desperate lawless Left.

ScumMedia I believe a SCOTUS seat has come up in election year 29 times and a president has NEVER not nominated a replacement...including Obama Did you ever the same question of the other 29 times?

Wow! So you’re accusing a democratically elected POTUS of doing his job, amazing👏🏼 You do know that you’re supposed to be an actual news channel, right?

CarolinaFaith2 I call it a slap on you Fake News’s face. When SkyNews become such an ass h0le

Wow Sky news must be liberal fake news too

A brilliant woman with minority children was just nominated to SCOTUS and she may defend the unborn. Too scary for the closed liberal mind.

Democracy in Western worlds is brain death !

Funny you're not calling out boris' covid legislation for that

Neither! Fulfilling his constitutional duty as President....

First, the U.S. is not a Democracy it’s a Constitutional Republic, it’s helpful to understand the difference. Second, it doesn’t matter if “generations don’t share her views”. The Supreme Court exists to interpret an existing Constitution, not write a new one.

Both, clearly. NoQ VoteBlue VoteEarly VoteByMail TermLimits VoteBidenHarris FreedomFromReligion

Fixed it for ya

Sky's leftie news staff being petulant again. 😭😂

What the hell are you even talking about?

It's actually how our government works. But thanksfor playing.

Both.

Neither🤡

Hey Sky news. America isn't a democracy. Why do you struggle with this so much?

Both 🤨

Neither, you helmet heroes.

The latter.

How about doing his job?

A smidgen of both, with a whole lot of special interests and CYA.

´

False choice... It's neither.... What it actually is, is obvious. Trump had a seat on SCOTUS open and a GOP Senate that will fill it. It's really that simple.

Or perhaps he is doing exactly what any other president would have done in that situation and, you know, made a decision. 🤷🏾‍♂️

Constitutional move, next

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Trump nominates replacement for Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader GinsbergLiberals say Amy Coney Barrett's religious views could lead to hard-fought abortion rights being clawed back.
Source: MetroUK - 🏆 13. / 82 Read more »

Trump expected to nominate Amy Coney Barrett for Supreme CourtAdvocacy and welfare groups react to growing speculation that Amy Coney Barrett will get the nod for the Supreme Court seat. Cool No he won't.
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »

These Fox News hosts' old statements about the Supreme Court could come back to haunt TrumpThe talk of the US political world is not only “who will fill Justice Ginburg’s place”, but also the brutal hypocrisy of the Republican party on the issue. Wrong!!! Nothing haunts republicans, they live by the hypocritical oath! Look at videos of Republican Senators in 2016 clearly saying a president should NOT nominate a SCOTUS in an election year. They love going back on their word with no repercussions. It won’t - it never does. They do and say anything they want and their audience drinks it all up. Not really. Everyone already knows they're paid puppets, and incredible hypocrites. Trump won't care. The cult won't care. And nobody else takes them seriously. They're disgusting 'folks', but nothing they say carries any political weight. They're trash.
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »

Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Supreme CourtThe president hailed Amy Coney Barrett as 'a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect and sterling credentials'. There goes everyone’s rights... We offer the best signals and you will also get free course and 24/7 📲support Our forex strategy and signals are 75% winning rate and 95% of our customers are happy and making serious profits. Send DM today to join us. Beautiful nomination and acceptance speech by Ms Barrett
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »

Trump set to pick Amy Coney Barrett for supreme court, stoking liberal backlashThe Indiana conservative would replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg, as a secretive Catholic group, of which Barrett is a member, steps into the spotlight I love It! MAGA TRUMP2020 FillTheSeat Another christian fascist? This court is illegitimate. You must mean Liberal Whitelash?
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »

Analysis: Why Trump was never going to nominate a Cuban-American woman for the Supreme CourtAnalysis: The president’s campaign has always been about white evangelical voters, and his high court pick reflected that Analysis: Why Trump was never going to nominate a Cuban-American woman for the Supreme Court How many 12 year olds did Prince Andrew get to know in Thailand? He went there so many times with Epstein... Analysis: Why the Independent would still lose its sh*t even if Trump had nominated a Democrat-voting African American disabled transgender woman
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »