'Maybe the war would have ended earlier.' Afghanistan watchdog says secrecy hurt oversight effort
Perhaps no one in Washington is more knowledgeable about America’s failures in Afghanistan than John Sopko, Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction.
December 21, 2021 7:00 AM EST I n the days leading up to the chaotic American withdrawal from Afghanistan, John Sopko’s staff began receiving urgent emails from the U.lockdown in England and the staggered easing of restrictions until June 2020.Mon 20 Dec 2021 19.Mon 20 Dec 2021 14.
S.State Department to shut down public access to his agency’s website.“It is assessed that the need to protect lives by continuing this set of policies justifies the negative impacts identified,” said a document from April last year.As Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), Sopko is charged with producing reports cataloging the waste, fraud and abuse that has plagued 20 years of U.Martin Thomas, whose appointment as chair of the Charity Commission was approved by a committee of MPs this month, quit last Friday, just days before he was due to take up the job, over allegations he had acted inappropriately while chair of a women’s charity.S.” The documents found that the disproportionate impact on ethnic minority groups was justified because they also had a “higher risk of infection and hospitalisation” from Covid.reconstruction spending in Afghanistan.However, Johnson’s spokesperson said it was impossible to tell whether or not people were 2 metres apart, as was the rule at the time for work meetings.
On Aug.A document from 15 April 2020 admitted that restrictions would “exacerbate mental health issues”, including for people with learning disabilities, autism and other conditions who were cut off from normal care and treatment services.According to the Times , Thomas was subject to four formal misconduct complaints while at Women for Women International UK, including an incident in 2018 when he mistakenly sent a picture of himself in a Victoria’s Secret lingerie store to a female employee, supposedly as part of a conversation with the charity chief executive about whether to accept a donation from the company.16, a day after the U.S.It warned that trans people may be unable to obtain hormones or have gender-affirming surgery due to delays and cancellations, “resulting in severe negative impacts on mental health”.-backed government collapsed , State Department officials requested the SIGAR office temporarily disable its website where more than 700 reports and audits compiled over the past 13 years are free and available to the public.He had left the charity in the summer and claims he was unaware of the finding against him when he applied for the Charity Commission job.All of this oversight work needed to be analyzed and scrubbed as a precaution, the department officials wrote.The assessments found that school children and university students were adversely affected by closures, and were more likely to find it “extremely difficult to cope with lockdown” than older people.This shows colleagues who were required to be in work, meeting following a press conference to discuss work.
Their fear was that SIGAR’s reports might contain information that identified Afghan allies or other sensitive data that may put innocent people at-risk of Taliban retaliation.Sopko was sympathetic to the concern.” Some measures to ease lockdown were also found to be discriminatory, such as the decision to permit individual prayer in June 2020, which benefitted Christians more than Muslims, Sikhs, Jews and other religions with a focus on collective worship.“We want to see a strong, credible and impartial Charity Commission capable of fulfilling its role regulating our sector and that has the confidence of charities in England.After all, SIGAR itself was in the middle of trying to ensure its staff was evacuated and all its Afghan partners were safe.But it was also an uncomfortably familiar request.For years, across multiple administrations, Sopko felt pressured by the State and Defense Departments to needlessly redact or classify information in its reports that detailed major failings in the Afghan government or military.It follows controversies over the ministerial attempts to appoint favoured candidates as chair of the.Obviously, all individuals required to be in work sought to obey social distancing guidelines.
Meanwhile, he’d watch senior U.S.leaders publicly praise the smallest signs of progress, reassuring Americans that things in Afghanistan were now on the right track.So Sopko pushed back, asking for the State Department comptroller to put down in writing the reason for the request and why SIGAR’s reports, which have been publicly available for years, suddenly posed a risk.After receiving State Department Comptroller Jeffrey Mounts justification on Aug.Very few workplaces were open, and when this was the case, staff were urged to keep as distanced as possible.
19 , SIGAR pulled down hundreds of reports and scrubbed the information.Later, Sopko ordered his team to review each of the 2,400 redaction requests.He says his agency found all but four to be without merit.“They may have had good intentions, but it made no sense,” Sopko tells TIME.“You don’t ask an agency to do something that’s against its regulations or against its policies unless you have a really good justification.The picture shows Johnson’s wife, Carrie, sitting next to him, apparently holding their then newborn son.
And the problem was, we never got an explanation other than, ‘This could possibly, maybe, we think, harm somebody.’” Perhaps no one in Washington is more knowledgeable about America’s many failures in Afghanistan than Sopko.Since taking charge of SIGAR in July 2012, he’s been immersed in the details of a war that’s killed more than 2,400 U.S.troops, wounded another 20,000, and maimed or killed hundreds of thousands of Afghans over two decades.Speaking later Starmer said there were “very serious questions to be answered”.
But after a decade of investigation, chief among Sopko’s concerns about America’s handling of the war isn’t a particular failed multimillion-dollar project, ill-conceived diplomatic strategy or shoddy battle plan.It’s the U.S.government’s inability to be honest with the American people.Sopko says Washington’s inclination to classify information about the war severely hobbled public discourse and may have caused it to drag on years longer than it should have.” Asked why the photo appeared to show people standing more closely together, Raab appeared to argue that this mattered less as they were outdoors, something not mentioned in the guidance: “There is significant difference.
So when someone asks him to redact information, he needs a good reason why.“The government doesn’t classify good news,” Sopko says.Afghan people climb atop a plane as they wait at the Kabul airport in Kabul on Aug.16, 2021.Wakil Kohsar—AFP/Getty Images After the Taliban takeover, the U.
S.government scrambled to save Afghan partners that were in danger.The Pentagon said it temporarily removed more than 120,000 photos and 17,000 videos of the Afghanistan War from its digital archives.Similarly, the State Department insists all redaction requests sent to SIGAR were to ensure partners inside the country remained safe from Taliban reprisals.But Sopko says State went beyond an abundance of caution, asking his agency to scrub widely known facts, such as former Afghan President Ashraf Ghani’s name, the location of the U.
S.Army’s Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Ala.and the name of a USAID official who publicly testified before Congress in 2017—even though video footage of his testimony remained on YouTube.“Do you really think the Taliban doesn’t know who the president of Afghanistan was?” Sopko says.“This was silly.
This was also a waste of taxpayers money.And it didn’t help anyone.” Sopko had locked horns with U.S.officials over redaction requests before.
In 2015, for instance, the Pentagon requested SIGAR classify information on the performance of the Afghan security forces, allegedly requested by the Afghan government on the grounds that it tipped off the Taliban to the forces’ posture.Sopko says the request included information such as “casualty data, unit strength, training and operational deficiencies, tactical and operational readiness of Afghan military leadership, comprehensive assessments of Afghan security force headquarters leadership; and operational readiness rates down to the corps level.” That’s exactly the kind of information one would need to know if the military was a viable force, he says.Classifying it deprived the American people of being able to measure the Afghan forces’ success or failure.Congress could still read this information, but members couldn’t publicly talk about it in detail.
“The Taliban knew this information.The Afghan government knew this information,” he says.“The only people who did not know this information were the people who were paying for it: the U.S.taxpayer.
” "The Taliban knew this information.The Afghan government knew this information.The only people who did not know this information were the people who were paying for it: the U.S.taxpayer.
" The U.S.spent at least $84 billion to train and equip Afghanistan’s 300,000-plus troops and police, which vastly outnumbered the estimated 75,000 Taliban fighters now in control of the country.The Afghan government owned an air force of attack planes and helicopters, armored trucks and heavy weaponry.In the end, though, not one piece of this multibillion-dollar arsenal, which now belongs to the Taliban, could replace the willingness to fight or the instinct for survival, as Afghan troops saw that fellow soldiers who surrendered to the militants were allowed to live and those who fought were often brutally executed.
Americans knew the day would come when U.S.forces would finally withdraw from Afghanistan, leaving the Afghan government to fend for itself.But it was widely believed that Afghan security forces could stave off Taliban offensives against major population centers, like Kabul, for a year or possibly more.Instead, Afghan defenses lasted a matter of weeks—a collapse so sudden and complete that many Americans were stunned when it finally did.
If more information in SIGAR’s reports on the forces had been unclassified, Sopko wonders, could it have had a larger impact on the way the conflict ended? There were no shortage of media reports documenting bad news in Afghanistan, of course, but what if the American public saw the U.S.government’s archive of facts detailing the years-long history of dysfunction, corruption and poor performance? “Maybe the war would have ended earlier,” he says.“We’ll never know, because the information was classified.” Some aspects of any war must be kept secret, Sopko acknowledges, such as human sources of intelligence and methods by which the information is obtained.
However, an inspector general shouldn’t scrub information because it’s politically damaging.Craig Whitlock investigated the government’s deception over the war in a 2019 Washington Post The Afghanistan Papers ,” a searing report largely based on previously classified SIGAR documents which he obtained after filing multiple public-records requests and two Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits.“U.S.officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan throughout the 18-year campaign, making rosy pronouncements they knew to be false and hiding unmistakable evidence the war had become unwinnable,” Whitlock writes.
A group of military families and veterans watch President Joe Biden's speech announcing that all troops are out of Afghanistan, in Long Beach Calif., on Aug.31, 2021.Apu Gomes—AFP/Getty Images Sopko, 69, earned a reputation in the late 1970s and early 1980s as a hard-charging federal prosecutor in Ohio.He notably helped secure convictions of six Cleveland mafia members on racketeering charges.
In 1982, he set off to Washington as a congressional staffer, working for Representative John Dingell of Michigan and Senator Sam Nunn of Georgia, both Democrats.Thirty years later, President Barack Obama appointed to Sopko take over SIGAR, a position created by Congress in 2008.Sopko replaced Arnold Fields, a retired Marine general, who resigned after critical assessments of the agency’s audits.Almost immediately after his appointment, Sopko drew fire from inside Washington for being outspoken with the media and combative inside government—qualities not often found among inspectors general.Over the last decade, his job has focused on digging into America’s $146 billion reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan.
Next year, he’s been tasked with finding out why nearly all of it failed.“It was our largest development project in history, it was the United States’ longest war in history and we should learn some lessons about what happened,” Sopko says.“Not only to point fingers, but to learn some lessons.Because mistakes we made there, we may very well make, again, someplace else.” America’s war in Afghanistan is over, but Sopko says oversight on what went wrong has just begun.
He just hopes his findings will make it past government censors.Make sense of what matters in Washington.More Must-Read Stories From TIME Elon Musk Is.
For all those who are new to this working from home Bitcoin trading options Here's a little tip: Get a trusted Bitcoin expert and stick to him blake_scott55 Invest and play at similar times each day. Because : In times of chaos, your investment is your anchor to success I’m Mike Weirsky, the lottery winner of $273m in NJ. I’m helping those who are in need with this money. Because I believe givers never lacks.❤️
Ethnic minorities disproportionately impacted by Covid lockdowns, government admitsAssessments published on Information Commissioner’s orders after government claimed secrecy was ‘in the public interest’
Calls for rerun of selection process to find next head of Charity CommissionVoluntary sector leaders say they have no confidence in appointments system after resignation of new watchdog chair
No 10 says garden photo shows PM and staff having work meetingsSpokesperson says wine-drinking was within rules and it is impossible to tell if people were 2 metres apart Yes, 'work meetings' with cheese and wine. Drinking on the job? Invite your wife to work day? On the same day
Helen Flanagan says she's done with having kids as 'our family is complete'EXCLUSIVE: In our brand new interview the former Coronation Street actress and fiancé Scott Sinclair reveal another baby is out of the question following the birth of son Charlie in March
US ‘closer to civil war’ than most would like to believe, new book saysAcademic and member of CIA advisory panel says analysis applied to other countries shows US has ‘entered very dangerous territory’ Anyone imagining it's only the US closer to civil war has their head stuck up their arse. National and international tensions have been ratcheting up for years, especially since 2008. There are several independent drivers acting in concert. All promoted by neoliberalism.
Pret a Manger told to rethink subscription ads after 5,000 complaintsUK advertising watchdog steps in after customers claim some drinks are unavailable Amazing how news outles EXCEPT BBCnews either don't mention my blog rupert_jones or quote from my blog without naming For over a year I contactedpress, tweeted, blogged about this I now leak all to BBC. LynnieA3 cjp_still name_lus SocialThought11 ewan_bert world_news_eng