Space debris: How do we solve the problem of dead satellites?With an increasing number of governments and private companies capable of launching satellites,
the space around the planet is beginning to get congested.So what can be done to stop these broken machines becoming a threat to those that we still rely on?
Get British experts on the case
Here is the likely best solution to solve the Space Junk dangerous growing problem before reaching a point of no return. SpaceJunkCollector SJC001 SenBillNelson esaoperations NASA csa_asc WHOSTP DLR_en spacegovuk SpaceForceCSO UKSpaceCmd SpaceX
Sure there'll be pikeys out there willing to collect it. Lots of scrap metal.
Hire the Clangers.
Colonise the moon so that big nuclear powered garbage collection cruisers can be built there and easily launched from the moon to collect lots of junk. The infrastructure on the moon will also make exploring the rest of the solar system a lot easier and act as a test bed for tech
Simple. Stop sending shit up there.
If you send it up, you are responsible for disposing of it. If they don't, they can't send a any more up.
Guns?
Stop letting billionaires acting as though they’ve got the rights to outer space.
Are such harmful consequences regulated against, right now? It seems that anyone is free to do or invent things without thought of the impact.
Space wombles?
I have solution since Elon Musk's SpaceX company has been launching thousands of satellites let him to clean this shit up.
Just add it to the long list of other environmental problems we're not solving.
One by one
well if it's a Tory solution I imagine they'd spend 30 billion on 'consultants', predict a cost of 100 billion and then overrun by 'only' 200 billion and then discover it doesn't work, never worked and never could have.
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »
Source: TheSun - 🏆 64. / 61 Read more »
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: MetroUK - 🏆 13. / 82 Read more »
Source: MotherAndBaby - 🏆 128. / 51 Read more »
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »