Womens safety groups have accused the Duke of York’s legal team of “victim blaming” after reports that they plan to question whether the woman who’s accused him of sexual assault had “false memories”.
Virginia Guiffre has claimed she was forced by Jeffrey Epstein to sleep with Andrew when she was just 17, allegations he has always strongly denied.
MinnieStephC4 Spot on; a fine approach.
MinnieStephC4 If he is innocent (admittedly a big “if”) how on earth can he defend himself without saying that she is either lying or deluded?
MinnieStephC4 Sick. This is the representative of the British Royal Family
MinnieStephC4 God, he’s disgusting, he makes me sick 🤢🤮
MinnieStephC4 Good, about time these groups opened their mouths. I am fed up with their silence. PrinceAndrewTrial
MinnieStephC4 It’s what defence lawyers do, set out to make the women look in the wrong, to wreck their reputation. It’s vicious and stops many women from coming forward.
MinnieStephC4 PrinceAndrewSued
MinnieStephC4 He can’t remember whether he sweats or not!
MinnieStephC4 They’re his lawyers in fairness. Not sure approaching them as true memories will do him much good.
MinnieStephC4 Did the witness that saw him grinding up against her have false memories too?
MinnieStephC4 So he's supposed to defend himself without questioning the evidence or suggesting another scenario of what happened? Why bother with trials in that case, just lock up anyone who anyone ever accuses of anything.... 🙄
MinnieStephC4 you see no one was worried in No10 - staff, Doris, wife , parties, trips up north, rules broke (and they worked with the scientits and 'experts' daily!) SO WHY DID THE REST OF THE COUNTRY HAVE IT'S FREEDOM TAKEN AWAY NEVER AGAIN - BIN THE REGS .....NOW
Shambles151 MinnieStephC4 Cannot imagine what Andrew's Mom is going through. She is still a mom after all.
MinnieStephC4 Always the women fault meghanmarkle
MinnieStephC4 This ‘false memory’ is grating on my last nerve. 😡
Shambles151 MinnieStephC4 Go for the 'false memory' ploy. It worked for Ms Maxwell, didn't it? And that nice Mr Weinstein? No - and no one else ever. Because it's complete and utter b****cks. Get better advice, Andy. And settle!
MinnieStephC4 If you really must always qualify ‘denied’ with an adverb, then ‘unconvincingly’ would be far more accurate than ‘strongly’.
MinnieStephC4
MinnieStephC4 The best form of defense is attack from this vile vermin of a man and those that are defending him.
MinnieStephC4 I think he’s guilty as sin personally, but considering he has yet to be found as such, there is no victim in this case. Of course his legal team will question their version of events. That’s what you’d expect them to do, and they are paid for
SeemaChandwani MinnieStephC4 Is that the anti perspirant Mummy ?
MinnieStephC4 What about his false memories of not remembering ‘that photo’?
MinnieStephC4 They will use every trick in the book 📚 to exonerate him from the Claim against their client
MinnieStephC4 Surely their use of the word 'victim' preempts the outcome. It never happened, according to Andrew, so he isn't blaming a victim.
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: The Mirror - 🏆 136. / 51 Read more »
Source: Daily Mail Online - 🏆 135. / 51 Read more »
Source: MetroUK - 🏆 13. / 82 Read more »
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: The Mirror - 🏆 136. / 51 Read more »
Source: Evening Standard - 🏆 102. / 51 Read more »