Allen v Farrow is pure PR. Why else would it omit so much?

  • 📰 The Guardian
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Qulity Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 53%

Allen v Farrow is pure PR. Why else would it omit so much? | Hadley Freeman

United Kingdom Headlines News

United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines

The problem with bias is that it undermines everything you say, however interesting or credible. Of greatest significance to obsessives about this case is the revelation in the documentary that, in their map of the house, the Connecticut State Police drew a train track in the attic space where Dylan says her father molested her. Since 2014,

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 84. in UK
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

This is a terrible take. I don’t understand why anyone defends this man. Even if you think every word Mia says is a lie, he still took naked pictures of her daughter and made movies normalizing grown men dating teenagers.

This is so irresponsible HadleyFreeman Your paltry attempt at research shows. Plenty of things you state as fact that have later been corrected. You’re defending a child molester.

Wow, this article reeks of bias. Just say you don't want to believe a grown woman who consistently reported sexually inappropriate behavior by her father who has a well reported history of sexually inappropriate behavior.

Really So w how come her tune was different when it's Michael Jackson? Hypocrisy at its finest!!!!

🤮🤮🤮

How about Leaving Neverland? That movie was full of proven lies, old myths debunked years ago and impossible timelines. You should watch this video:

Why are you such a hypocrite? Where was this fairness to Michael Jackson?

Racism is not always conscious. It's sometimes the bias that allows you to be more empathic with a white person than a black one. When you think it's wrong to have a one-sided hit piece about a white man, but the same thing about a black man has your full support.

Imagine saying a man’s own child is lying about alleged abuse but being quick to believe two grown men peddling sick fantasies about Michael Jackson in hopes for a quick buck!

The caucacity of this woman to denouce the Allen doc, when she was shoveling manure on Michael Jackson’s grave and eating up the lies in L*aving N*verland! Why does she believe the yt man and not the Black man found innocent in a court of law?

Besides the obvious hypocrisy from this columnist. What does Farrow gain by lying? It doesn’t make any sense to continue to push this narrative if it’s false. They’d just be happy they got away with the lie for this long - why renew it.

Thanks. I’ve been waiting to read a critique of that ridiculous documentary.

PR is why this article is written.

Hadley = Diabolical double standards & henious hypocrisy. 🤢🤮 A whole volume can be written on what Leaving Neverland omited & its ... ya know what, you just can't teach bigoted stupid & the system that supports it. Anyway, hit Amazon Prime or YT & type in Square One.

A Tale Of 2 HBO Hit Pieces. Michael Jackson. Black man, unable to defend himself, fully & unanimously exonerated in life w/provably false allegations. Freeman: 'Abuser' & 'Predator'. Woody Allen: White man, alive/able to defend himself. Freeman: Doc is so biased & partial. 🖕

Written by Hadley and this is the headline...anyone surprised? Loool. Sounds about white.

Haven't heard from this hack 'journalist' for a long time. So, she's still a karen.

Hasn't HadleyFreeman been sacked yet? My God the hypocrisy of that clueless, spiteful 'woman'.

Leaving Neverland: Omits 7 years of litigation that outlines in forensic detail how the accusing parties have committed serial perjury while seeking (but failing) millions. Hadley: Perfection Allen v Farrow: Carbon copy of Leaving Neverland. Hadley: This is not fair

Why this woman who promoted happily a pedophile fiction and attacked the Jacksons on Twitter is still not fired ? She doesn't do journalism, but propaganda.

Its the same argument against Leaving Neverland, but Hadley is a hypocrite of the highest order.

Allen v Farrow: Why would it omit so much? Leaving Neverland, the blue print for Allen v Farrow: Right side of history. Hadley speeking to a black family who were left heartbroken after an attack on their loved one. 'keep sucking on that money teat'.

Mia Farrow, so hot back in the day

Double Karen... the media still ignoring BJackson82 ,when are you going to stop ignoring her? Never right? you only need one side against the dead black man (which was proven innocent by court)but when it’s the white Allen suddenly you must hear his side?

You never hide your biased and racist agenda Guardian specially when you give to a blatant RACIST propagandist the space to slander an INNOCENT DEAD BLACK Michael Jackson but defending a WHITE man or giving him the right to look at his side unlikely Freeman did with MJ.

althea_sansone jin_chohan Look at this. The same outlet who pushed leaving Neverland. I thought you wanna see this

Wasn’t she cancelled & fired for being a TERF? She’s back? The embodiment of White privilege.

I will take Hadley Freeman seriously when she will take seriously what Amber Turd did on Johnny Depp, how Michael Jackson has been mistreated by conmen & racist MSM, & how Johnny Depp is mocked by misandrist UK associations/rag hacks/politicians.

Buffoons.

The hypocrisy here stinks. That's all I'm going to say

Let's not forget the way she ♥ 2 mistreat Johnny Depp by calling him horrible names. Because when she attacks him saying BS, yet doesn't denounces the abuse Amber Turd did, then I have problem taking her word seriously (even though I defend Woody Allen).

Why did Leaving Neverland omit so much? Like Robson & Safechuck's lawsuits, Robson's relationship with Jackson's niece, Safechuck's time-traveling train station, Robson BEGGING to do tribute show etc Funny how Hackley believed that garbage but not this one

The vile way Hadley Freeman behaves by mistreating Michael Jackson makes her work less respectable & taken seriously when she tries 2 defend the artists she wants to defend. If she has time 2 watch BS pieces like LN, she has time to watch Square One MJ.

Hackley just couldn't help put Jackson in there too, eh? Despite the fact she's been proven WRONG about HBO's bullshit 'documentary' about him that aired 2 years ago? I don't know enough about Allen case yet but Hackley insulted/blocked real abuse victims who exposed her lies.

Strange double standard from that Rita Skeeter 2 defend Woody Allen (whom I support & defend), but not the same rigour 4 due process & denunciation of biased 1-sided pieces. Especially when she defended the quickly debunked BS Leaving Neverland by HBO. 1/

Double standards so much.

If only Hadley had had the same sense of justice and fairness with Michael Jackson, who was slandered without a chance to defend himself in Leaving Neverland, a documentary that in no way, shape or form showed the other side. What a joke.

Is this the infamous white privilege? Seriously, the double standards are astonishing.

A typical Allen apologist, Freeman thinks 'Allen v Farrow' isn't balanced because there's not enough character assassination of Mia Farrow utterly unrelated to Allen's rape of Dylan. In Hadley's bizarre calculus, the tragic death of Farrow's children makes Allen less guilty.

oh dear

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Mia confronts Woody about alleged sexual assault in Allen v Farrow‘I’ve always, always been worried about you and Dylan,’ Farrow says in a taped phone call He’s such a creep RonOsbornOmaha JusticeIsComing
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »

Mia Farrow confronts Woody Allen over sexual assault claims on a callThe third installment of HBO's explosive series Allen v. Farrow, which aired Sunday features Mia Farrow confronting Woody Allen about Dylan Farrow's sexual assault allegations in a taped phone call. Put blame on black people death penalty should happen to woody allen Must be affecting her mental health.
Source: Daily Mail Online - 🏆 135. / 51 Read more »

Allen v Farrow, review: this documentary series has already picked its side'Allen v Farrow, a documentary exploring the Woody Allen sexual abuse allegations, was problematic in its blinkered approach' | Writes anitathetweeter Allen v Farrow, review: ⭐⭐
Source: The Telegraph - 🏆 41. / 63 Read more »

Allen v Farrow review – a one-note pick over the bones of old investigationsThe HBO series arrives on Sky in the UK, but fails to dig deep and do more than regurgitate Mia and Dylan Farrow’s allegations against Woody Allen Hey guys ✋ Please support true journalism Please subscribe our channel it needs only 1sec Your 1sec and 1 sub means a whole world to someone Thank you :) I just moved to your city, who wouldn't mind showing me interesting places? The author can’t go into detail into court decisions or the investigations. Why the Yale/New Haven report couldn’t make a decision that no child abuse took place. I’m positive this author has never read much beyond an Allen press release.
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »

Mia Farrow accuses Woody Allen of ‘weaponising’ Soon-Yi Previn against herActor appears in the HBO docuseries Allen v Farrow They both are child molesters, who cares? The poor girl needs mental counseling and a good cop to talk to. He has weaponised against her? What does she think she has been doing with the other 2 against him?
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »