Washington weighs risk of defending Taiwan against China
US President Joe Biden is expected to announce his strategy toward China soon, and calls are growing for him to make a clear public commitment to ...
AsiaThe US cruiser USS Antietam as it pulls in to port at the Republic of Korea naval base in Jeju, South Korea on Oct 12, 2018, after crossing the Taiwan Strait. (Photo: AFP/William Carlisle)06 May 2021 04:31AMShare this contentBookmarkWASHINGTON: US President Joe Biden is expected to announce his strategy toward China soon, and calls are growing for him to make a clear public commitment to defend Taiwan militarily in the event of Chinese aggression.
China considers Taiwan, which has a population of 23 million, to be a rebel province that will one day return to the mainland's fold, by force if necessary.AdvertisementAdvertisementThe United States, which has diplomatically recognised Beijing since 1979, has maintained relations with Taipei and remains its most important military ally.
A US law requires Washington to help the island defend itself in the event of a conflict, but the United States haspursued a policy of"strategic ambiguity"for decades, refraining from clearly stating what circumstances would lead it to intervene militarily on Taiwan's behalf. headtopics.com
The aim is two-fold: to avoid provoking Beijing, which might see this as a pretext for adopting a more aggressive policy towards Taiwan, but also to curb any desire on the part of the Taiwanese government to formally declare independence, which would set off a powder keg.
This ambiguity has allowed the United States to maintain a certain stability in the region. But in the face of China's growing aggressiveness, some experts, such as the influential Council on Foreign Relations president Richard Haass, believe that"the time has come for the United States to introduce a policy of strategic clarity".
AdvertisementAdvertisementBiden should"(make) explicit that the United States would respond to any Chinese use of force against Taiwan," Haass said in an essay published by Foreign Relations magazine in September."Ambiguity signals to Beijing that there are questions over America's commitment to the region, exasperated by four years of an America-first mantra that shrunk US leadership in the world," Michele Lowe, a former US Navy officer and current fellow at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, said recently.
"Clarity provides the opposite."'DEEPLY DESTABILISING'AdvertisementIn recent months, the Chinese air force has increased incursions into Taiwan's air defence identification zone. The US military fears a surprise invasion by China, and they, too, criticise the lack of clarity from the executive branch. headtopics.com
The former head of the US forces in the Indo-Pacific region, Admiral Philip Davidson, told Congress in March that China could invade Taiwan"in the next six years," and that the concept of strategic ambiguity"needs to be reexamined".
Two weeks later, Admiral John Aquilino - who succeeded Davidson - remained vague before US Senators about the timing of a possible Chinese invasion, but said he was prepared to discuss"the risks and rewards of a potential policy change" with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.
Other Biden advisers are more reticent, such as US intelligence director Avril Haines, who was asked last week about the impact of such a change during a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee."The Chinese would find this deeply destabilising," she said."I think it would solidify Chinese perceptions that the US is bent on constraining China's rise, including through military force, and would probably cause Beijing to aggressively undermine US interests worldwide."
Additionally, she said, the Taiwanese government could be pushed to declare independence, especially since Beijing's crackdown in Hong Kong has hardened Taipei's position on the issue.But Biden does not seem tempted to abandon all ambiguity, according to national security adviser Jake Sullivan. headtopics.com
"We continue in the footsteps of bipartisan consensus in US China policy going back decades, Democratic administrations, Republican administrations, and we oppose unilateral changes to the status quo," Sullivan said last week during a conference organized by the Aspen Institute think tank.
"We have communicated that to China. We have affirmed that with Taiwan." Read more: CNA »
Outpouring of support will spur me on, says Joseph Schooling after Olympics exit
TOKYO: Less than a day after his exit from the 2020 Olympic Games, Joseph Schooling sits on a foldable chair in the shadow of the hulking Tokyo ...
America has NO right to decide that Taiwan is not part of China. China MUST take back Taiwan by force in response to the American 'strategic clarity' which aims to separate Taiwan from China.
Washington weighs risk of defending Taiwan against ChinaUS President Joe Biden is expected to announce his strategy toward China soon, and calls are growing for him to make a clear public commitment to defend Taiwan militarily in the event of Chinese aggression.
US condemns political use of COVID-19 vaccines after China-Taiwan tussleThe United States stands with Honduras and condemns the 'cynical use' of COVID-19 vaccines for political purposes, the State Department said, ...
China says US threatening peace as warship transits Taiwan StraitRight. China is begging for war and they will get one. Make sure the CCP criminals get their dues if they make any moves. Pretend fight by wards
China says US warship illegally enters its territory in South China Sea
Taiwan fights to attend WHO meeting, but China says no