Bharat Biotech, Nepal, Covaxın, Vaccine Shots, Astrazeneca Vaccine, Emergency, State Research İnstitute, India, Department Of Drug Administration

Bharat Biotech, Nepal

Nepal becomes third country to give emergency nod to Indian vaccine COVAXIN

Nepal becomes third country to give emergency nod to Indian vaccine COVAXIN

19/3/2021 5:30:00 PM

Nepal becomes third country to give emergency nod to India n vaccine COVAXIN

Nepal on Friday gave emergency authorisation to India 's COVID-19 vaccine COVAXIN , becoming only the third country to approve the shot, developed by Bharat Biotech and a state research institute . COVAXIN was shown to be 81% effective in an interim analysis of late-stage trial data on some 26,000 people in India . The vaccine was approved for emergency use in India in January and Zimbabwe cleared it early this month.

AdEine Investition von € 250 in diese Unternehmen könnte Ihnen ein zweites Einkommen bringenSouth China Morning PostMr ‘Indispensable’: China’s top diplomat to US Cui Tiankai to stay on in Biden eraChina’s top envoy to the United States Cui Tiankai is expected to stay on in the job to help handle the volatile relations between the two countries, according to diplomatic sources in Beijing. The decision to keep the veteran diplomat in Washington is believed to be part of Beijing’s plans to manage tensions with the new US administration and prepare for confrontational competition over the long term. After nearly eight years in the position, Cui is already the country’s longest-serving ambassador to Washington, and several people with knowledge of the matter, including Chinese diplomats, said Beijing had no plan to replace him any time soon.Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China. “Cui has been well regarded among the leadership for his ability to help reduce miscommunication and misperceptions and avoid conflict between China and the US,” said a diplomat in Beijing who spoke on condition of anonymity. “His role has been and will remain largely indispensable – at least for now.” Coronavirus: China’s US ambassador Cui Tiankai takes veiled swipe at Donald Trump for politicising outbreak Cui is in the Alaskan city of Anchorage this week for the first face-to-face dialogue between top American and Chinese diplomats since US President Joe Biden took office. The meeting will be led by President Xi Jinping’s top foreign policy aide Yang Jiechi, Foreign Minister Wang Yi, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan. In an interview with Chinese media on the eve of the talks, Cui sought to temper expectations for the high-stakes event. “So we do not have unrealistic expectations or illusions on it,” he told state news agency Xinhua and several other Chinese media outlets. “But I hope that it will become a beginning and that the two sides will start a candid, constructive and rational process of dialogue and communication. If this can be achieved, then the dialogue will be successful.” His remarks were largely in line with Beijing’s internal assessment of the Biden administration’s China policy, which is still under review, according to sources. Observers said that while Beijing had softened its antagonistic tone in recent weeks to show willingness to engage with the Biden team, the Chinese leadership did not expect Washington to significantly deviate from the US bipartisan consensus to confront China. “For Beijing, dealing with Biden’s multilateral approach on China is definitely more challenging than [former US president Donald] Trump’s unilateral, single-minded crusade against China. That’s why Beijing is in urgent need of capable diplomatic veterans, like Cui,” said Gu Su, a political analyst at Nanjing University. US-China relations: Alaska’s chill mirrors the outlook for talks between nations’ diplomats Cui started his US tenure in April 2013, and at 68 is well beyond the statutory retirement age of 65 for cabinet-level ministers and ambassadorships of similar protocol rank. He has been the focus of persistent speculation over the past few years about his retirement plans, especially since the sudden departure last year of the US ambassador to China Terry Branstad. In an interview with former US Treasury secretary Hank Paulson last year, Cui signalled his intention to retire. “Honestly, I have to confess, when I first came here, I didn’t expect I would stay here for so long,” he said. “I do feel grateful that I’m doing this job at this critical moment for both our countries. This is most probably my last posting abroad in my diplomatic career.” Cui’s deep knowledge of the US affairs and personal connections with incumbent and former US government officials and lawmakers could be a key reason his retirement plan has to be postponed again, according to Pang Zhongying, an international affairs analyst at the Ocean University of China. Sources and observers also confirmed that Beijing had high hopes of progress through Cui’s personal ties with officials from Biden’s White House, many of whom are veterans from the era of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. According to a retired senior Chinese diplomat, there are widespread concerns within Beijing’s foreign policy establishment about hard-headed realists in the Biden camp – including Kurt Campbell – in favour of standing up to China’s assertiveness. “It is hoped that his personal ties in the US may still play a role in shifting the new US administration’s perceptions about China,” he said. Although controversial among China watchers in the US, Cui’s close ties with Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, were largely credited with securing Beijing’s access to the unconventional former US leader, when official and other semi-official channels of communication effectively shut down. Cui is also known for being one of the few Chinese diplomats who are still well respected in both China and the US. Campbell, who is also expected to be at the Alaska meeting, spoke highly of Cui and once described him as a “very strategic” diplomat. “[He] always comes with a game plan, is never rattled, and if he did express anger, it was as part of a show,” Campbell said in 2013. Cui has also been praised for keeping a distance from Wolf Warrior-style diplomats, such as his foreign ministry colleague spokesman Zhao Lijian, who embraced Xi’s call for a “greater sense of fighting spirit”. But many observers said Beijing’s inability to replace Cui for years might point to a deeper, more worrying problem – the ageing of the senior diplomatic line-up and the shortage of younger, well-trained, first-rate envoys. Gu of Nanjing University said that although Beijing had increased its budget for diplomacy, the lack of professionalism and a pool of competent career diplomats would remain a stumbling block for China’s diplomatic service as well as its ability to repair its international reputation around the world.More from South China Morning Post:US-China relations: both sides set to talk tough at Alaska summit – but it still may be progress of a kindChina likely to be hot topic when top US officials visit Japan, South Korea, observers sayUS-China relations: Alaska’s chill mirrors the outlook for talks between nations’ diplomatsUS-China relations: No ‘unrealistic expectations’ for Alaska meetingThis article Mr ‘Indispensable’: China’s top diplomat to US Cui Tiankai to stay on in Biden era first appeared on South China Morning PostFor the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2021.

Victoria JC student infected with Covid-19; 103 people quarantined, 2,200 others to be swabbed 7 community cases among 20 new COVID-19 infections in Singapore Victoria Junior College student positive for COVID-19; more than 100 students, staff members quarantined

a day agoUS-China summit in Alaska turns civil after fiery start, but no room for hosted dinnerThe first day of talks between China and the United States in Alaska on Thursday started off on a predictably contentious note after days of posturing and talking past each other by the two powers, although there was some indication that the mood improved later behind closed doors. Things started off civilly as the Chinese delegation walked down a long hallway in Anchorage’s Hotel Captain Cook, where the Americans are staying, everyone masked, past camera crews and into a ballroom to be greeted by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken. But in the opening statements a few minutes later the gloves came off, with China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi heard to tell the US side it was “no way to treat the guests”.Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China. This was followed by efforts on both sides to frame the heated exchanges. Chinese state media later quoted an unnamed Chinese official – in a background briefing after the first day of talks – that China was sincere in its dialogue with the US, but the American side had overrun its opening remarks and made groundless accusations against China. “This is not a way of hospitality, nor does it conform to diplomatic etiquette. China has responded solemnly to this,” the official said, according to state broadcaster CCTV. In another sign of tension, the two sides did not sit down for a meal together, generally customary in meetings of this kind. And a senior US official, speaking on background afterwards, countered that the US side had arrived hoping to lay out “the principles, interests, and values that animate our engagement with Beijing” but that the Chinese side “seems to have arrived intent on grandstanding, focused on public theatrics and dramatics over substance”. The official also criticised the Chinese side for “violating protocol” by speaking for far longer than the agreed-upon two minutes. Alaskans are unfazed by the high-level US-China diplomacy in their midst After the tense public tit-for-tat, however, there was some indication the two sides managed to cool down behind closed doors. “After the pool spray, Secretary Blinken opened the discussion, and both sides immediately got down to business,” said a senior official on background. “The ensuing conversation was substantive, serious, and direct. In fact, the discussion went well beyond the two hours we had allotted. We used the session, just as we had planned, to outline our interests and priorities, and we heard the same from our Chinese counterparts.” And top Chinese diplomat Yang Jiechi during a lengthy address touted China’s success in containing Covid-19 and tackling poverty while the US was still battling the pandemic. The two-day meeting is the first face-to-face sit-down between the two sides as relations hit rock bottom. The US delegation is headed by Blinken and national security adviser Jake Sullivan while China is represented by Yang and Wang. Sullivan set the tone. “We do not seek conflict, but we welcome stiff competition, and we will always stand up for our principles, for our people, and for our friends,” he said, according to a pool transcript of the meeting. Blinken followed with his own salvo, telling his Chinese counterparts and assembled media that the US side would shortly outline its “deep concerns” about Chinese actions in Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan, the economic coercion of US allies and cyberattacks on the United States. “Each of these actions threatens the rules-based order that maintains global stability,” he said. Yang quickly struck back, accusing Washington of using its financial and military might to squeeze other countries and adding that abusive US national security policies threatened the future of global trade. Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan were inseparable parts of China, he said. The Communist Party enjoyed widespread support, he added, citing opinion polls, while the US should stop interfering in China’s internal affairs and had nothing to be proud of at a time when Black Americans were being “slaughtered”. China urged to adopt ‘grand strategy’ to counter Biden containment plan Washington should abandon its “cold war mentality” and legacy of confrontation, he continued, adding: “The United States does not represent international public opinion and neither does the Western world.” When Yang finished, after more than 15 minutes, he smiled and said in English: “This is a test for the translator.” Blinken countered that the translator should get a raise. Wang then adopted a more conciliatory tone, but referenced “unwarranted accusations from the US side”, adding: “This is not supposed to be the way one should welcome guests,” according to the reports. What then followed, according to attendees, was a series of unscripted afterthoughts as reporters were told to leave, then called back to hear more. The seismic disconnect between the two giants at the opening was amply foreshadowed in recent weeks as they laid out their arguments and different visions publicly, playing to their respective home crowds and to countries watching from the sidelines. “I don’t see the Biden administration believing that cooperation is essential,” said Elizabeth Economy, a fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. “And the Chinese are willing to tolerate quite a high degree of confrontation.” Beijing – which is keen to engage Washington sooner rather than later, before the Joe Biden administration’s China policy is fully formed and US allies arrayed against it – has repeatedly characterised the meeting as the start of a substantive engagement and used the term “high-level strategic dialogue”. Washington has characterised it as a one-off with little chance of going anywhere. “I wouldn’t see this as one in a series,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters this week. “This is a meeting that our national security adviser and secretary of state are attending, and I wouldn’t build it out beyond there at this point in time.” Chinese state tabloid Global Times reported that tariffs would “definitely” be on the agenda. Sullivan told reporters the focus would be largely on broad policy, not tariffs. And the two traded jabs this week over the Biden administration’s cornerstone policy of working closely with frustrated allies in pushing back on Beijing. US Indo-Pacific coordinator Kurt Campbell told Australia’s Sydney Morning Herald and sister publication The Age that defending the country against Chinese economic coercion was a top US priority. Beijing has cut off Australian imports and slammed Canberra rhetorically after it joined other nations in calling for an inquiry into the origin and early handling of Covid-19, which was first detected in Wuhan. “We are not going to leave Australia alone in the field,” he said, adding that any improvement in US-China relations would only come after Beijing backed off. The nationalist Global Times – at various times a provocateur, sounding board and indirect channel for official thinking – fired back. “Canberra delusional to think the China-US dialogue will focus on its woes,” it said in an “expert assessment”. Even if the Americans did bring it up, the article added, “does that mean Chinese officials would have to listen?” The two sides clearly were not doing much listening on Thursday. “The Alaska meeting will not be successful, but it is important,” said Lee Seong-hyon, director of the Centre for Chinese Studies at Sejong Institute in Seoul. “It won’t be successful because both sides will not be fully satisfied. It will be an important meeting because both sides will confirm the other’s bottom lines. The emerging outcome will set the tone for a period of a “loose Cold War”. Members of the Biden administration have criticised their Trump administration predecessors for negotiating too much in the media and by tweet, and eschewing diplomacy behind closed doors. But the Biden administration has been doing most of its early communications with China in front of the cameras. Blinken said in an interview in Tokyo with TV Asahi that “the concerns that we’ve expressed publicly are the same ones that we’ll be expressing to them in private”. Further narrowing any chance of significant progress, the State Department chose to announce shortly before the meeting that 24 Chinese and Hong Kong officials were subject to sanctions. While largely symbolic – most were already sanctioned by the Treasury Department – the release could have been delayed until after the meeting. US imposes new sanctions against 24 officials over Hong Kong electoral overhaul The two sides have also aired more petty differences. A US official said the Chinese had registered their unhappiness with the possibility of having to submit to coronavirus testing – required for all out-of-state visitors arriving at the airport in Anchorage – before the meeting. An unwillingness to eat together was telegraphed days before. “Everything in the schedule is strictly business,” a US official said earlier in the week when asked about a shared meal, speaking on background. Others taking part in the talks include Chinese ambassador to the United States Cui Tiankai and vice foreign minister Xie Feng; from the National Security Council, Campbell and senior China directors Laura Rosenberger and Rush Doshi; and from the State Department, deputy assistant secretary Jonathan Fritz, acting assistant secretary Sung Kim and Chinese and Mongolian affairs director Sarah Beran and Beijing embassy charge d’affaires Robert Forden.More from South China Morning Post:US-China relations: high-level diplomatic talks are unheard-of in Alaska, but locals are unfazedUS efforts to rally allies against China are not useful or effective, says Beijing on eve of Alaska talksRussian foreign minister to visit China hard on heels of Alaska talksUS-China relations: Alaska’s chill mirrors the outlook for talks between nations’ diplomatsThis article US-China summit in Alaska turns civil after fiery start, but no room for hosted dinner first appeared on South China Morning PostFor the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2021.

17 hours agoThe Smart InvestorHere’s How Much DBS Group Would be Worth Today If You Had Invested S$10,000 in it One Year AgoBelief in the local bank's strong franchise reaps significant rewards for investors. The post Here’s How Much DBS Group Would be Worth Today If You Had Invested S$10,000 in it One Year Ago appeared first on The Smart Investor. headtopics.com

Read more: Yahoo Singapore »

2 influencers face deportation from Bali over painted-on face mask prank