Court of Appeal acquits man on death row accused of trafficking 1.8kg of cannabis

27/5/2022 9:45:00 AM

Court of Appeal acquits man on death row accused of trafficking 1.8kg of cannabis

Court of Appeal acquits man on death row accused of trafficking 1.8kg of cannabis

SINGAPORE — The Court of Appeal on Friday (May 27) overturned the conviction of a man on death row accused of trafficking more than 1.8kg of cannabis, after finding that it was a case of mistaken delivery.

Raj Kumar Aiyachami, 40, was convicted in 2020 of possessing the Class A controlled drug for the purpose of trafficking, which carries a mandatory death sentence.LinkedIn SINGAPORE: The Court of Appeal on Friday (May 27) overturned the conviction of a man on death row accused of trafficking more than 1.The pair were charged over a bag of drugs containing not less than 1.LinkedIn MADRID : A Spanish court has dismissed an appeal from Colombian singer Shakira and ratified a prior decision, which saw"sufficient evidence" to send her to stand trial over alleged tax fraud, a court document showed on Thursday.

The Court of Appeal also acquitted a second man involved in the case, Ramadass Punnusamy, 41, who was previously sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane after being found guilty as a drug courier.Both men were nabbed on Sep 21, 2015, when Ramadass, a lorry driver for a transport company in Johor Bahru, drove into Singapore and delivered a red plastic bag to Raj at Senoko Drive.Raj Kumar Aiyachami, 40, was convicted in 2020 of possessing the Class A controlled drug for the purpose of trafficking, which carries a mandatory death sentence.Central Narcotics Bureau officers knew the delivery would be taking place that day, and arrested both men shortly after.The three-judge court, led by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, allowed the appeal of Raj Kumar Aiyachami, 40, against his conviction and mandatory death sentence for drug trafficking.At trial, Raj and Ramadass did not dispute that they were in possession of the drugs.Both men were nabbed on Sep 21, 2015, when Ramadass, a lorry driver for a transport company in Johor Bahru, drove into Singapore and delivered a red plastic bag to Raj at Senoko Drive.Delivering the court's judgment, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon said that both men's appeals turned solely on whether they had actual or presumed knowledge of the nature of the drugs found.The new decision is a ratification of a prior court ruling issued in July 2021.

The court ruled in favour of Raj's defence that he had ordered chemically-sprayed tobacco, known as"Butterfly", and that the cannabis was delivered to him by mistake.At trial, Raj and Ramadass did not dispute that they were in possession of the drugs.The pair had been charged over a bag of drugs containing not less than 1.It found that the trial judge erred in rejecting the testimony of Mark Kalaivanan Tamilarasan, a man Raj first met in prison between November 2017 and January 2018.During one conversation in the prison yard, after learning the circumstances of Raj's arrest, Mark told Raj that he was also at Senoko Loop on Sep 21, 2015 to collect"ganja", the street name for cannabis, but ended up receiving"Butterfly" instead.The court ruled in favour of Raj's defence that he had ordered chemically-sprayed tobacco, known as"Butterfly", and that the cannabis was delivered to him by mistake.Raj told Mark to inform his lawyers Anand George, Ramesh Tiwary and Sankar Kailasa Thevar Saminathan of this, and Mark subsequently gave his evidence in court.Raj, a Singaporean, who was represented by Mr Ramesh Tiwary, did not dispute the drugs were in his possession but contended that there had been a mistaken delivery.Mark testified that he remembered the transaction took place on Sep 21, 2015 because his pet hamster died that evening and he got a tattoo with the date.During one conversation in the prison yard, after learning the circumstances of Raj's arrest, Mark told Raj that he was also at Senoko Loop on Sep 21, 2015 to collect"ganja", the street name for cannabis, but ended up receiving"Butterfly" instead.They have been together since 2011.

The trial judge rejected Mark's testimony after finding that there was"ample opportunity" for him and Raj to"collude and manufacture the story".However, Chief Justice Menon said that without a specific finding of actual collusion, Mark's evidence should not have been rejected.Mark testified that he remembered the transaction took place on Sep 21, 2015 because his pet hamster died that evening and he got a tattoo with the date.He said he had been told that four bags of chemically sprayed tobacco had been placed in the lorry he was driving."There is an immense difference between having the opportunity to do something and actually doing that thing," said the court.The court also noted that by giving his evidence, Mark was implicating himself in a very serious offence that he had not been charged with or investigated for.However, Chief Justice Menon said that without a specific finding of actual collusion, Mark's evidence should not have been rejected."The fact that Mark had effectively confessed to having at least attempted to commit a serious offence is a weighty factor in evaluating his evidence," the judges said.The trial judge did not believe Raj's account of how he had ordered Butterfly on credit, finding it too incredible.

The Court of Appeal also disagreed with the trial judge's finding that Raj must have known he was in possession of cannabis because of the smell emanating from the package.The court also noted that by giving his evidence, Mark was implicating himself in a very serious offence that he had not been charged with or investigated for.The appeal by Ramadass, represented by Ms N K Anitha, Mr Eugene Thuraisingam and Mr Johannes Hadi, contested the reliability of statements that he gave to police on the day of his arrest.The prosecution had argued that Ramadass admitted to actual knowledge of the nature of the drugs in these statements.The Court of Appeal also disagreed with the trial judge's finding that Raj must have known he was in possession of cannabis because of the smell emanating from the package.[[nid:571005]] Ramadass, who the trial judge found was a courier, was issued a certificate of substantive assistance and was sentenced to life imprisonment and the mandatory minimum of 15 strokes of the cane.The Court of Appeal found that numerous discrepancies and inconsistencies regarding the words that Ramadass used in the statements, as well as the times they were recorded at, made them unsafe to rely on."Where the case against an accused person turns on the specific words that are reflected in a statement, as is the case here, it is critically important that the court be satisfied as to the accuracy of the statement," said the court.The prosecution had argued that Ramadass admitted to actual knowledge of the nature of the drugs in these statements.

The court also noted that Ramadass consistently maintained that he believed he was bringing in chemically-sprayed tobacco, and found that he successfully rebutted the presumption of knowledge of the nature of the drugs.The court also concluded that the contested statements could not be relied upon to show that Ramadass had actual knowledge of the drugs.The appeals were heard by a panel of three judges comprising Chief Justice Menon, Justice Andrew Phang and Justice Belinda Ang."Where the case against an accused person turns on the specific words that are reflected in a statement, as is the case here, it is critically important that the court be satisfied as to the accuracy of the statement," said the court.CNA has asked the Attorney-General's Chambers for more information, including what will happen to the men following their acquittal.CNA For more reports like this, visit.The appeals were heard by a panel of three judges comprising Chief Justice Menon, Justice Andrew Phang and Justice Belinda Ang.

Read more:
TODAY »
Loading news...
Failed to load news.

Court of Appeal acquits man on death row accused of trafficking 1.8kg of cannabisSINGAPORE: The Court of Appeal on Friday (May 27) overturned the conviction of a man on death row accused of trafficking more than 1.8kg of cannabis, after finding that it was a case of mistaken delivery. Raj Kumar Aiyachami, 40, was convicted in 2020 of possessing the Class A controlled drug for the

Court of Appeal acquits 2 men of cannabis trafficking; 1 had been on death rowTwo men who were initially convicted of drug trafficking — one of whom was sentenced to the death penalty — were acquitted by the Court of Appeal on Friday (May 27). The three-judge court, led by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, allowed the appeal of Raj Kumar Aiyachami, 40, against his conviction and mandatory death sentence for drug trafficking. The court...

Shakira loses appeal to avoid trial in Spanish tax fraud caseMADRID : A Spanish court has dismissed an appeal from Colombian singer Shakira and ratified a prior decision, which saw 'sufficient evidence' to send her to stand trial over alleged tax fraud, a court document showed on Thursday.Prosecutors claim the 'Hips Don't Lie' singer failed to pay up to 14.5 millio

Appeal rejected: Disgraced ex-Kpop star Seungri to serve 18-month jail sentence in full - The Independent Singapore NewsThe singer was indicted on prostitution, overseas gambling, and other financial criminal charges. He was convicted of arranging sex services for potential investors in his business, as well as overseas gambling at luxurious casinos in Las Vegas involving illicit foreign exchange transactions.

Apex court acquits two men of cannabis trafficking; one had been given death penalty

Lim Tean to defend activist Gilbert Goh on pro bono basis (free service for public good) in court next week over unlawful assembly charges - The Independent Singapore NewsMr Goh, a social activist, is said to have staged an unlawful protest on May 1 last year near the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority building at Kallang Road. He held up a sign saying, “Please ban all flights from India. We are not racist! Just being cautious.” Not again.