Court of Appeal acquits man on death row accused of trafficking 1.8kg of cannabis
SINGAPORE: The Court of Appeal on Friday (May 27) overturned the conviction of a man on death row accused of trafficking more than 1.8kg of cannabis, after finding that it was a case of mistaken delivery. Raj Kumar Aiyachami, 40, was convicted in 2020 of possessing the Class A controlled drug for the
LinkedIn SINGAPORE: The Court of Appeal on Friday (May 27) overturned the conviction of a man on death row accused of trafficking more than 1.LinkedIn MADRID : A Spanish court has dismissed an appeal from Colombian singer Shakira and ratified a prior decision, which saw"sufficient evidence" to send her to stand trial over alleged tax fraud, a court document showed on Thursday.Telegram - Advertisement - The South Korean Supreme Court upheld the jail sentence given to singer Seungri, a former K-pop singer who had been with the boyband BIGBANG.Copy to clipboard https://str.
8kg of cannabis, after finding that it was a case of mistaken delivery.Raj Kumar Aiyachami, 40, was convicted in 2020 of possessing the Class A controlled drug for the purpose of trafficking, which carries a mandatory death sentence.5 million euros ($15.The Court of Appeal also acquitted a second man involved in the case, Ramadass Punnusamy, 41, who was previously sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane after being found guilty as a drug courier.The singer, who retired from show business as the Burning Sun scandal mounted, later enlisted in the military.Both men were nabbed on Sep 21, 2015, when Ramadass, a lorry driver for a transport company in Johor Bahru, drove into Singapore and delivered a red plastic bag to Raj at Senoko Drive.They argue Shakira was living in the Spanish northern region of Catalonia during those years though the Colombian pop star's representatives have said she moved to Spain only in 2015 where she has met all her tax obligations since then.Central Narcotics Bureau officers knew the delivery would be taking place that day, and arrested both men shortly after.The pair had been charged over a bag of drugs containing not less than 1.
At trial, Raj and Ramadass did not dispute that they were in possession of the drugs.The court still has to formally send her to stand trial and set a date.He was given a three-year jail sentence as well as ordered to pay 1.Delivering the court's judgment, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon said that both men's appeals turned solely on whether they had actual or presumed knowledge of the nature of the drugs found.The court ruled in favour of Raj's defence that he had ordered chemically-sprayed tobacco, known as"Butterfly", and that the cannabis was delivered to him by mistake."Shakira's conduct on tax matters has always been impeccable in all the countries she had to pay taxes and she has trusted and followed faithfully the recommendations of the best specialists and advisers," the statement said.It found that the trial judge erred in rejecting the testimony of Mark Kalaivanan Tamilarasan, a man Raj first met in prison between November 2017 and January 2018.com on Thursday (May 26).During one conversation in the prison yard, after learning the circumstances of Raj's arrest, Mark told Raj that he was also at Senoko Loop on Sep 21, 2015 to collect"ganja", the street name for cannabis, but ended up receiving"Butterfly" instead.They have been together since 2011.Ramadass, a Malaysian, did not dispute that he had delivered the bag to Raj, but contended that he did not know the nature of the drugs.
Raj told Mark to inform his lawyers Anand George, Ramesh Tiwary and Sankar Kailasa Thevar Saminathan of this, and Mark subsequently gave his evidence in court.Mark testified that he remembered the transaction took place on Sep 21, 2015 because his pet hamster died that evening and he got a tattoo with the date.9329 euros).The order to pay 1.The trial judge rejected Mark's testimony after finding that there was"ample opportunity" for him and Raj to"collude and manufacture the story".However, Chief Justice Menon said that without a specific finding of actual collusion, Mark's evidence should not have been rejected."There is an immense difference between having the opportunity to do something and actually doing that thing," said the court.He will be moved to a correctional facility for the remainder of his sentence, as he is now at a Military Correctional Institution.The trial judge also rejected Ramadass's evidenceand said he had ample opportunity to tailor his evidence in order to fit Raj's defence.
The court also noted that by giving his evidence, Mark was implicating himself in a very serious offence that he had not been charged with or investigated for."The fact that Mark had effectively confessed to having at least attempted to commit a serious offence is a weighty factor in evaluating his evidence," the judges said.The Court of Appeal also disagreed with the trial judge's finding that Raj must have known he was in possession of cannabis because of the smell emanating from the package.Reports claimed a woman working at the club had been sexually assaulted.The appeal by Ramadass, represented by Ms N K Anitha, Mr Eugene Thuraisingam and Mr Johannes Hadi, contested the reliability of statements that he gave to police on the day of his arrest.The prosecution had argued that Ramadass admitted to actual knowledge of the nature of the drugs in these statements.The court also concluded that the contested statements could not be relied upon to show that Ramadass had actual knowledge of the drugs.
The Court of Appeal found that numerous discrepancies and inconsistencies regarding the words that Ramadass used in the statements, as well as the times they were recorded at, made them unsafe to rely on.There were also allegations that the Burning Sun’s staff were drugging female sex workers so that their customers could take advantage of them."Where the case against an accused person turns on the specific words that are reflected in a statement, as is the case here, it is critically important that the court be satisfied as to the accuracy of the statement," said the court.The court also noted that Ramadass consistently maintained that he believed he was bringing in chemically-sprayed tobacco, and found that he successfully rebutted the presumption of knowledge of the nature of the drugs.The appeals were heard by a panel of three judges comprising Chief Justice Menon, Justice Andrew Phang and Justice Belinda Ang./TISG Follow us on Social Media Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.Source: CNA/dv(gr).
Shakira loses appeal to avoid trial in Spanish tax fraud caseMADRID : A Spanish court has dismissed an appeal from Colombian singer Shakira and ratified a prior decision, which saw 'sufficient evidence' to send her to stand trial over alleged tax fraud, a court document showed on Thursday.Prosecutors claim the 'Hips Don't Lie' singer failed to pay up to 14.5 millio
Appeal rejected: Disgraced ex-Kpop star Seungri to serve 18-month jail sentence in full - The Independent Singapore NewsThe singer was indicted on prostitution, overseas gambling, and other financial criminal charges. He was convicted of arranging sex services for potential investors in his business, as well as overseas gambling at luxurious casinos in Las Vegas involving illicit foreign exchange transactions.
Apex court acquits two men of cannabis trafficking; one had been given death penalty
Court erupts in laughter as witness says he’s not a Johnny Depp fanAmber Heard’s lawyer accused holiday park worker Morgan Night of being a big fan of the actor
Halep hopes to learn from on-court panic attackPARIS : Simona Halep said she would have to learn to put less pressure on herself after suffering a panic attack during her second-round loss at the French Open on Thursday. The former world number one and 2018 French Open champion called for the doctor during the third set of her loss to Chinese teenager
Man facing charges in court allegedly raped 61-year-old woman while out on bail