Court of Appeal acquits 2 men of cannabis trafficking; 1 had been on death row

27/5/2022 9:59:00 AM

Court of Appeal acquits 2 men of cannabis trafficking; 1 had been on death row

Court of Appeal acquits 2 men of cannabis trafficking; 1 had been on death row

Two men who were initially convicted of drug trafficking — one of whom was sentenced to the death penalty — were acquitted by the Court of Appeal on Friday (May 27). The three-judge court, led by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, allowed the appeal of Raj Kumar Aiyachami, 40, against his conviction and mandatory death sentence for drug trafficking. The court...

The pair were charged over a bag of drugs containing not less than 1.LinkedIn SINGAPORE: The Court of Appeal on Friday (May 27) overturned the conviction of a man on death row accused of trafficking more than 1.Copy to clipboard https://str.LinkedIn MADRID : A Spanish court has dismissed an appeal from Colombian singer Shakira and ratified a prior decision, which saw"sufficient evidence" to send her to stand trial over alleged tax fraud, a court document showed on Thursday.

875kg of cannabis.Lim Yaohui Two men who were initially convicted of drug trafficking — one of whom was sentenced to the death penalty — were acquitted by the Court of Appeal on Friday (May 27).Raj Kumar Aiyachami, 40, was convicted in 2020 of possessing the Class A controlled drug for the purpose of trafficking, which carries a mandatory death sentence.The three-judge court, led by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, allowed the appeal of Raj Kumar Aiyachami, 40, against his conviction and mandatory death sentence for drug trafficking.The court also allowed the appeal of Ramadass Punnusamy, 41, against his sentence of life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.The court also allowed the appeal of Ramadass Punnusamy, 41, against his sentence of life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.Both men were nabbed on Sep 21, 2015, when Ramadass, a lorry driver for a transport company in Johor Bahru, drove into Singapore and delivered a red plastic bag to Raj at Senoko Drive.The appeals of both men turned solely on whether each of them knew about the nature of the drugs.The new decision is a ratification of a prior court ruling issued in July 2021.

The pair had been charged over a bag of drugs containing not less than 1.At trial, Raj and Ramadass did not dispute that they were in possession of the drugs.875 kg of cannabis.875kg of cannabis.Central Narcotics Bureau officers had observed Ramadass delivering the bag to Raj on Sept 21, 2015.The court ruled in favour of Raj's defence that he had ordered chemically-sprayed tobacco, known as"Butterfly", and that the cannabis was delivered to him by mistake.Raj, a Singaporean, who was represented by Mr Ramesh Tiwary, did not dispute the drugs were in his possession but contended that there had been a mistaken delivery.He said he had ordered a tobacco laced with a synthetic chemical that mimicked the narcotic effects of cannabis, known as Butterfly, and had gone to pick it up but received a bag of cannabis instead.[[nid:573195]] He said he had ordered tobacco laced with a synthetic chemical that mimicked the narcotic effects of cannabis, known as Butterfly, and had gone to pick it up but received a bag of cannabis instead.During one conversation in the prison yard, after learning the circumstances of Raj's arrest, Mark told Raj that he was also at Senoko Loop on Sep 21, 2015 to collect"ganja", the street name for cannabis, but ended up receiving"Butterfly" instead.They have been together since 2011.

Ramadass, a Malaysian, did not dispute he had delivered the bag to Raj but contended that he did not know the nature of the drugs.He said he had been told that four bags of chemically sprayed tobacco had been placed in the lorry he was driving.Mark testified that he remembered the transaction took place on Sep 21, 2015 because his pet hamster died that evening and he got a tattoo with the date.Ramadass, who was represented by Mr Eugene Thuraisingam, contested three statements he gave which appeared to suggest he had knowledge of the nature of the drugs.Ramadass, who was represented by Mr Eugene Thuraisingam, contested three statements he had given that appeared to suggest he had knowledge of the nature of the drugs.The pair were convicted by the High Court in June 2020.However, Chief Justice Menon said that without a specific finding of actual collusion, Mark's evidence should not have been rejected.The trial judge did not believe Raj's account of how he had ordered Butterfly on credit, finding it too incredible.The trial judge also rejected Ramadass's evidenceand said he had ample opportunity to tailor his evidence in order to fit Raj's defence.

The trial judge also rejected Ramadass' evidence and said that he had ample opportunity to tailor his evidence to fit Raj's defence.The court also noted that by giving his evidence, Mark was implicating himself in a very serious offence that he had not been charged with or investigated for.Raj was given the mandatory death sentence.[[nid:571005]] Ramadass, who the trial judge found was a courier, was issued a certificate of substantive assistance and was sentenced to life imprisonment and the mandatory minimum of 15 strokes of the cane.The Court of Appeal also disagreed with the trial judge's finding that Raj must have known he was in possession of cannabis because of the smell emanating from the package.On Friday, the Court of Appeal allowed their appeals and overturned their conviction.On Friday, the Court of Appeal allowed their appeals and overturned their conviction.The court said Raj had succeeded in establishing his defence of mistaken delivery, which was supported by the evidence of other witnesses.The prosecution had argued that Ramadass admitted to actual knowledge of the nature of the drugs in these statements.

The court also concluded that the contested statements could not be relied upon to show that Ramadass had actual knowledge of the drugs.Join.This article was first published in."Where the case against an accused person turns on the specific words that are reflected in a statement, as is the case here, it is critically important that the court be satisfied as to the accuracy of the statement," said the court.

Read more:
AsiaOne »
Loading news...
Failed to load news.

Court of Appeal acquits man on death row accused of trafficking 1.8kg of cannabisSINGAPORE: The Court of Appeal on Friday (May 27) overturned the conviction of a man on death row accused of trafficking more than 1.8kg of cannabis, after finding that it was a case of mistaken delivery. Raj Kumar Aiyachami, 40, was convicted in 2020 of possessing the Class A controlled drug for the

Apex court acquits two men of cannabis trafficking; one had been given death penalty

Shakira loses appeal to avoid trial in Spanish tax fraud caseMADRID : A Spanish court has dismissed an appeal from Colombian singer Shakira and ratified a prior decision, which saw 'sufficient evidence' to send her to stand trial over alleged tax fraud, a court document showed on Thursday.Prosecutors claim the 'Hips Don't Lie' singer failed to pay up to 14.5 millio

Man facing charges in court allegedly raped 61-year-old woman while out on bail

Court erupts in laughter as witness says he’s not a Johnny Depp fanAmber Heard’s lawyer accused holiday park worker Morgan Night of being a big fan of the actor

Halep hopes to learn from on-court panic attackPARIS : Simona Halep said she would have to learn to put less pressure on herself after suffering a panic attack during her second-round loss at the French Open on Thursday. The former world number one and 2018 French Open champion called for the doctor during the third set of her loss to Chinese teenager