Could the Workers' Party have handled the Raeesah Khan incident better?

Could the Workers' Party have handled the Raeesah Khan incident better?

3/12/2021 3:19:00 PM

Could the Workers' Party have handled the Raeesah Khan incident better?

SINGAPORE: Political analysts are divided over whether the Workers' Party (WP) could have better handled the incident involving its former Member of Parliament (MP) Raeesah Khan, who

.Institute of Policy Studies' deputy research director Gillian Koh argued that WP's leaders should have publicly acknowledged that Ms Khan had lied soon after they learnt about it in early August, or at least in October when Ms Khan repeated the untruth in Parliament.

Such Unluckly Moment Has Never Been Seen! The Scariest Sports Accidents

But Associate Professor Bilveer Singh at the National University of Singapore said it was reasonable that WP chief Pritam Singh gave Ms Khan the time she needed to set the record straight, given that personal elements – like her own experience with sexual assault – were involved.

Assoc Prof Singh added that the onus was on Ms Khan, as an elected MP, to correct what she had done.Related:WP leadership knew about Raeesah Khan's 'untruth' a week after her original speech in August: Pritam SinghOn Aug 3, Ms Khan gave a speech in Parliament saying that she had accompanied a sexual assault victim to the police station and alleged that the police had mishandled the case.

About a week later, after being"repeatedly pressed" on the matter, she told WP leaders about "new facts and disturbing personal revelations", including her own sexual assault case, Mr Singh told reporters on Thursday. Mr Singh, WP chair Sylvia Lim and vice-chair Faisal Manap were informed of the lie.

3,155 new Covid-19 infections in S'pore on Jan. 21, 1,539 low risk cases detected via ART

Of"immediate concern" to Mr Singh was that Ms Khan had not previously informed her family that she was a victim of a sexual assault, he said."In view of a sexual assault and my assessment of her state of mind, I was prepared to give her the space necessary to address the matter with her loved ones," he said.

But she was told that"any parliamentary clarification on this matter was hers to make in her capacity" as an elected MP.Ms Khan did not attend Parliament in September as she had shingles. At the next sitting in October, Ms Khan declined to reveal more details despite being pressed by Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam.

She claimed she had not been successful in contacting the victim.This account was"wholly inconsistent" with the revelations that she shared with the party leaders in August, Mr Singh said on Thursday. He added that"almost immediately" after this sitting, Ms Khan agreed with party leaders that she had to set the record straight.

3,155 new COVID-19 cases in Singapore as MOH starts including milder infections in daily case count

On Nov 1 in Parliament, Ms Khan admitted that she had lied about accompanying the sexual assault victim to a police station, and retracted the allegations against the police."SHOULD NOT TAKE THREE MONTHS"Dr Koh said many people will understand that Ms Khan needed time to settle her personal issues, given that she cited this as a reason behind her misleading statement in Parliament.

"But that is balanced against ... how much time is needed," she told CNA on Friday, acknowledging that Ms Khan had shingles in September."But really, this is quite a serious matter of misleading Parliament ... So if it's so serious, yes time might be given, but you would imagine that should not take three months (for the truth to emerge)."

Dr Koh said the"sharp point" was when Ms Khan repeated the untruth"in front of her party leaders" during the sitting in Parliament in October."By that time, they could very clearly have just called a press conference and used their own platform and set it straight. And then wait for the next parliamentary sitting and also put it on parliamentary record," she added.

When asked about Mr Singh's assertion that it was up to Ms Khan to correct her statement, Dr Koh said:"She needed to set the record straight, but she couldn't take three months about it, and certainly not lie again.""If she couldn't do it in a timely manner, and yet go on to reiterate the untruth, then how is that reasonable anymore?" Dr Koh asked.

"So I think that the Committee of Privileges is going to take this very seriously ... They will probably issue a penalty, even if they waive it, they have to make a statement that such behaviour is not acceptable."Ms Khan was referred to the Committee of Privilege on Nov 1 for breach of parliamentary privilege. The committee

, the Office of the Clerk of Parliament said on Dec 1 after her resignation."THREE MONTHS IS NO BIG DEAL"Assoc Prof Singh disagreed that WP should have revealed Ms Khan's untruth immediately after party leaders knew about it.He told CNA on Friday that"each political party has got its own process of managing issues like this".

"Ms Khan did not act fast, she acted a bit late. But to me, three months is no big deal," he said."I think the sexual assault part needed to be managed at the family level. All this requires time," he added."She was ill, then how to deal at a family level that she had been assaulted before ... I think Pritam would have seen the bigger picture and said 'okay', but I think after November that was it."

Assoc Prof Singh said it was clear from WP's press conference that the party would not support Ms Khan's untruth, and that she would have had to resign or be expelled eventually.On Mr Singh leaving Ms Khan to set the record straight, Assoc Prof Singh said:"She is not a small girl, she is an MP. So how do you deal with an MP? Probably, Pritam and the WP leadership must have felt that she is a responsible officeholder and she will be able to do something in a way to

save her and save her party."If the WP had"gone out and hurt" Ms Khan, Assoc Prof Singh said there could have been a"backlash from the public", and that the party could have been seen as "oppressive" and"very authoritarian".

"So, I don't think Pritam wanted to appear like that. I think he wanted to appear consultative. He was clear that 'I'm not going to support your lies'," Assoc Prof Singh added.HAS WP'S CREDIBILITY BEEN AFFECTED?When asked how the WP's handling of the episode would have affected its credibility, Assoc Prof Singh said the party would have to"work very hard to regain the confidence of Sengkang voters".

MP Faisal Manap (WP-Aljunied) will support the remaining Sengkang GRC MPs He Ting Ru, Louis Chua and Jamus Lim, who will each take over a part of the Compassvale ward vacated by Ms Khan.But Assoc Prof Singh said he wants to see WP's heavyweight figures like Low Thia Khiang, Sylvia Lim and Lee Li Lian to"boost up and bump up" WP's presence in Sengkang.

"Sometimes, shocks like this (the incident involving Ms Khan) are good for everybody," he added.Dr Koh said the public will give the WP"some concession" as it is an opposition party"fighting hard"."On the other hand, it's difficult to give them that concession because the public will feel this is a serious matter dealing with the integrity of its leaders," she said.

Read more: CNA »

Young anglers spreading message of sustainable fishing through social media and workshops

SINGAPORE — In a minute-long clip on social media platform TikTok, a presenter explains why it is okay to catch and keep hybrid groupers caught in Singapore waters.

JBJ and Mr Low would have handled it differently. A lie was told. And since she admitted it to them. They should do the rightful thing by remedy the problem asap rather than dragging the lie for months. Didn’t our parents teach us when we are young. Be truthful & humble. Nope. Next question. Thank you.

by not bringing her into the party in the first place? Of course ! sgelection Yes. WP should have supported the queen. istandwithraeesahkhan From the start....during campaigning......she already is a trouble maker.... a rebel without a cause. Even is pappy ib “Differently” is the word.

COMMENT: The Workers' Party and its 'inexplicable' response to Raeesah Khan saga'The party leadership took all queries, willingly subjecting themselves to the full glare of the media spotlight in person. (But) Thursday's press conference left Singaporeans with more questions than answers.'

Analysts disagree with WP's handling of Raeesah Khan matter, but some party members say leaders did what they couldThis could have resolved as soon as they know that she was lying. Allowing this untruth to continue festering is a lack of leadership on WP’s part. Analysts are always welcome to form a political party and take part in the “democratic” process of being elected before sprouting rubbish and be a keyboard or saliva warrior…😷

Turkey, canapes, mulled wine: What to order for your Christmas party at homeYour holiday shindig is just a few clicks away if your plan is to stay put at home with friends and family. Here are eight options to choose from.

Norway reports omicron cases linked to company partyAt least 50 people in and around Oslo have been infected with the omicron COVID variant, and the cases are connected to a company’s Christmas party in a restaurant.

WP leadership knew Raeesah Khan had lied a week after her August speech: Pritam SinghAsked by Yahoo News Singapore why Raeesah was not present to explain her actions, Singh said, 'She has resigned from the party, and so this is a party matter that we have to carry forward, and this is what we're doing now.' when u either gok sacked or leave..u still goe back 2 yr opic 2 xplaint?

COMMENT: The Workers' Party and its 'inexplicable' response to Raeesah Khan saga'The party leadership took all queries, willingly subjecting themselves to the full glare of the media spotlight in person. (But) Thursday's press conference left Singaporeans with more questions than answers.'