Here are three key areas where differences arose between what Ms Khan and the other WP members told the committee and what Mr Singh said during a press...
She further said she had not been told that she would be expelled if she did not resign.When she met the panel on Nov 29, it was suggested that she resign for her own well being, and because she had"lost the support" of her fellow Sengkang GRC MPs, she said. Ms Khan
resigned the next day.Ms Loh noted that the panel - comprising party chief Mr Singh, WP chairman Sylvia Lim and WP vice-chairman Faisal Manap - had known since Aug 8 that Ms Khan had lied to Parliament on Aug 3.The WP's statements on Nov 1 and 2 omitted mention of the party leaders' knowledge of and involvement in the matter, she said, adding that the panel should have disclosed this at an early stage.
Ms Loh also testified that Mr Singh and Ms Lim had both given Ms Khan comments on drafts of her Nov 1 statement, in which she admitted to lying.[FULL] The Workers' Party holds press conference following Raeesah Khan's resignation2. On why WP leaders did not urge Ms Khan to come clean sooner headtopics.com
During the WP press conference, Mr Singh said Ms Khan had initially"stuck to her untruth" in her communication with him after the Aug 3 sitting.She then disclosed a number of new facts and"disturbing personal revelations" after being repeatedly pressed, he added. These included her past sexual assault and"other related matters of a deeply personal nature".
Mr Singh explained that his immediate concern, when he learnt that Ms Khan had lied, was the fact that she had not informed her family members about her past sexual assault.He said he wanted to give her time to address the matter with her loved ones, and that it was made known to Ms Khan before the October sitting that it would be her responsibility to make any clarifications in Parliament.
Ms Khan said she met Mr Singh, Ms Lim and Mr Faisal Manap on Aug 8, and that the trio reacted with"incredible disappointment" and anger, but also compassion, when she told them her Aug 3 statement was false."The reaction was that if I were not to be pressed, then the best thing to do would be to retain the narrative that I began in August," she told the committee.
To this, Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Edwin Tong - a committee member - asked Ms Khan if this meant that"if you can get away with it, we don't have to clarify the lie".Ms Khan replied that this was correct.Raeesah Khan on WP leaders' reaction to admission of lie headtopics.com
Mr Tong then asked if the WP leaders initial reaction upon being told there as a lie"was to try and duck the issue if possible. And if it doesn't come up, then the truth may not be told eventually".In response, Ms Khan said:"I have to say, though, that Pritam Singh's initial response was that I should go to the Committee of Privileges. But after discussions and me explaining the circumstances that led me to the information in the first place, that changed."
At a subsequent meeting at her house on Oct 3, she said Mr Singh told her there would be no judgment from him if she were to"continue" or"retain" the false narrative. She interpreted this as advice to continue to lie if the matter were raised the next day.
Raeesah Khan: WP leader said if she 'continued the narrative, there would be no judgment'Ms Khan repeated the lie in Parliament on Oct 4. At the press conference, Mr Singh had said this was"wholly inconsistent with the revelations she had shared with the party leadership" in August.
But Ms Khan said she met Mr Singh and Ms Lim afterwards to discuss the next steps, and neither asked her why she had lied again, nor did they advise her to clarify the truth.She also disputed Mr Singh's account that she and the party leaders had agreed that she had to set the record straight"almost immediately" after Parliament adjourned on Oct 5. headtopics.com
The decision to do so was reached only on Oct 12, during a meeting with Mr Singh and Ms Lim, when the WP leaders came to the view that the matter would not be dropped, she said.Committee of Privileges Hearing on 2 December 2021 - Ms Raeesah Khan3. On the vetting process for MPs' speeches
Mr Singh said WP has a usual pre-parliamentary process, and Ms Khan was notified that she should be ready to substantiate her account that she had followed the sexual assault survivor to the police station.He said the process"did not fail" and that the"alarm" had gone off, but Ms Khan failed to take heed of that instruction.
In her testimony, Ms Khan said the WP's rule is that speeches should be submitted to an internal portal that all its current MPs can access, ahead of the sitting at which it is to be delivered. MPs can then leave comments on each other's speeches.
But Ms Khan's speech for the Aug 3 debate on empowering women was submitted late. She said she uploaded a draft two days before the sitting, instead of a week before as she should have.The initial draft did not contain the anecdote about her accompanying the survivor to the police station. She added this just a day ahead of the sitting.
Ms Khan said Mr Singh commented on the draft by circling the anecdote and writing"substantiate?", but she did not understand what he meant. She also did not reply to the comment.She said Mr Singh later expressed disappointment at the fact that she had not understood his comment or placed importance on it.Read more: The New Paper »
UK's PM sorry for partygate scandal amid calls to quit
LONDON — UK prime minister Boris Johnson on Wednesday (Jan 12) offered 'heartfelt apologies' for attending a lockdown-breaching party held in his Downing Street garden, but deflected calls to resign as the opposition leader called him a 'man without shame'.
WP CEC ‘voted overwhelmingly’ for Raeesah Khan to resign: Pritam SinghThe Workers’ Party (WP) Central Executive Committee (CEC) had “voted overwhelmingly” to ask Sengkang Member of Parliament Raeesah Khan to resign, even before she tendered her written resignation, said WP chief Pritam Singh on Thursday (2 December).
WP leadership knew Raeesah Khan had lied a week after her August speech: Pritam SinghAsked by Yahoo News Singapore why Raeesah was not present to explain her actions, Singh said, 'She has resigned from the party, and so this is a party matter that we have to carry forward, and this is what we're doing now.' when u either gok sacked or leave..u still goe back 2 yr opic 2 xplaint?
Could the Workers' Party have handled the Raeesah Khan incident better?SINGAPORE: Political analysts are divided over whether the Workers' Party (WP) could have better handled the incident involving its former Member of Parliament (MP) Raeesah Khan , who “Differently” is the word. Even is pappy ib From the start....during campaigning......she already is a trouble maker.... a rebel without a cause.
COMMENT: The Workers' Party and its 'inexplicable' response to Raeesah Khan saga'The party leadership took all queries, willingly subjecting themselves to the full glare of the media spotlight in person. (But) Thursday's press conference left Singaporeans with more questions than answers.'
Raeesah Khan: A look back at her short but eventful political career - The Independent Singapore NewsThe lies she told may cloud her credibility and political future, but she has youth on her side and the chance for redemption.
Where does the truth lie? Comparing the accounts of Raeesah Khan and WP chief Pritam Singhsimple. see who sue who till pants drop and wins. Good politicians lie all the way and no exceptions. Never trust politicians. Great liars