Trump ban ruling marks defining moment for Facebook panel
Facebook 's independent oversight board was gearing up Tuesday for a momentous decision on the platform's ban of former US president Donald Trump , as debate swirls on the role of social media in curbing hateful and abusive speech while enabling political discourse.
The ruling set for release at 1300 GMT (9 p.m. in Manila) Wednesday is likely to be a defining moment for the leading social network's so-called "supreme court" envisioned by company founder Mark Zuckerberg to make thorny decisions on what to allow or remove from Facebook.
The oversight board, which makes decisions that are binding on Facebook and cannot be appealed, will rule on whether to leave in place the Trump ban, or allow him back on the platform. It may also make related recommendations to the California-based social giant.
"This is a huge decision, it's getting a lot attention and deservedly so," said Daniel Kreiss, University of North Carolina professor and researcher specializing in politics and social media."This is significant for the global precedent it will set. If they uphold the ruling I think you will see more robust enforcement around the world." headtopics.com
The oversight panel, comprised of jurists, policy experts, journalists and others from around the world, will be making perhaps its most significant decision at a time when social platforms are struggling to remain open to political discourse while filtering out incitements to violence, misinformation and abusive comments.
Trump was suspended from Facebook after he posted a video during the deadly January 6 rampage at the US Capitol by his supporters in which he stated: "We love you, you're very special."The US leader was banned permanently by Facebook the following day, and he was taken off other platforms including Twitter and YouTube.
Watch more in iWantTFC TOO LATE?Some analysts said Facebook and other social networks should have acted on Trump sooner, after years of giving him an exemption from rules on hateful content because of his "newsworthiness" as a political leader.
"If anything, the decision to originally ban ... Trump should have come much earlier," said Samuel Woolley, a University of Texas professor specializing in computational propaganda."He was using Facebook and other platforms to actively spread patently false content about electoral processes -- very effectively undermining US democracy." headtopics.com
Facebook itself referred the case to the oversight board, in line with its position that company executives should not be in the position of making key decisions on content and political speech. The panel has received more than 9,000 comments in the case.
But the move by Facebook and others has also drawn a torrent of criticism from Trump supporters, who argue that large tech platforms are biased and stifling opposing views.And the ban has also sparked concern from others including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who called Facebook's move "problematic," and from civil liberties activists.
Jameel Jaffer, executive director of Columbia University's Knight First Amendment Institute, said the issue is more complex than simply evaluating Trump's comments."I'm hopeful the board will use this case as an opportunity to put a spotlight on Facebook's decisions about the design of its platform," Jaffer said.
"These engineering decisions are often invisible, but they determine which speech proliferates on the platform, how quickly it spreads, who sees it, and in what context they see it."In its submission to the board, the institute said Facebook should conduct "an independent study of how its platform may have contributed to the events of January 6" and that the panel should rule on Trump "only after the company has provided it with the results of that study." headtopics.com
Elizabeth Renieris, director of the Notre Dame-IBM Technology Ethics Lab said the ruling is unlikely to end the controversy about content moderation."The board's analysis and reasoning in this instance could very well help shape the policies of Facebook and other digital platforms regarding how to treat political leaders and other public figures in the future," she said.
"Whatever the decision, we should remain uneasy about the fact that decisions of this nature are being made by unelected, unaccountable corporations and their self-appointed assessors." Read more: ABS-CBN News Channel »
Vaccination of economic frontline workers begins in the Philippines
Three months since the Philippines began its legal immunization drive, economic frontline workers are now allowed to receive the COVID-19 vaccine
Ahead of Trump Facebook ruling, here’s how social networks handle world leaders Facebook 's independent oversight board on Wednesday will announce whether it is overturning the company's suspension of former US President Donald Trump 's account.
Facebook Oversight Board upholds ban on TrumpThe board says Facebook made the right decision but also gives Facebook 6 months whether to reinstate Trump or make the ban permanent according to its content policies.
Twitter suspends accounts skirting Trump banSAN FRANCISCO - Twitter on Thursday confirmed that it pulled the plug on several accounts trying to skirt its ban on former president Donald Trump by promoting his blog posts.
Trump administration obtained phone records of journalists: Washington PostThe Trump administration secretly obtained the phone records of Washington Post journalists who reported on allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, the newspaper reported Friday, prompting concerns over freedom of speech. liberals are finding ways to stop TRUMP from getting re elected next election 😂😂😂😂
White House chief of staff says he 'wouldn't want to estimate or underestimate' Trump if he decides to run in 2024White House chief of staff Ron Klain says that while President Joe Biden will likely seek re-election in 2024, the Biden administration is anticipating a bruising general election matchup if former President Donald Trump decides to run again.