Children , young adults cannot sue US government over climate change - ruling
A US federal appeals court on Friday threw out a lawsuit by children and young adults who claimed they had a constitutional right to be protected from climate change, in a major setback to efforts to spur the US government to address the issue. In a 2-1 decision, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals said the plaintiffs, who were between the ages of 8 and 19 when the lawsuit began in 2015, lacked legal standing to sue the United States. Circuit Judge Andrew Hurwitz said the majority reached its conclusion "reluctantly," given "compelling" evidence the government had long promoted fossil fuels despite knowing they could cause catastrophic climate change, and that failing to change policies could hasten an "environmental apocalypse." Our Children's Trust, an Oregon-based non-profit behind the lawsuit, said in a statement that it would seek an 11-judge panel of the court to review the decision. The ruling had "catastrophic implications," said Julia Olson, the group's executive director. A Department of Justice spokesman said the government was pleased with the outcome. The 21 children and young adults had accused federal officials and oil industry executives of violating their due process right to a "climate system capable of sustaining human life," by knowing for decades that carbon pollution poisons the environment but doing nothing about it. The government argued that neither US law nor history supported the young people's claim of a fundamental right to a "livable climate." It also called the lawsuit an unconstitutional attempt to control the entire country's climate and energy policy through a single court. Hurwitz said the case left "little basis for denying that climate change is occurring at an increasingly rapid pace," but that addressing it required "complex policy decisions entrusted, for better or worse, to the wisdom and discretion" of the White House and Congress. "That the other branches may have abdicated their responsibility to remediate the problem does not confer on Article III courts, no matter how well-intentioned, the ability to step into their shoes," he wrote. The dissenting judge, US District Judge Josephine Staton, said the Constitution did not "condone the Nation's willful destruction" through climate change, likening government inaction to shutting down all defenses to an asteroid barreling toward Earth. "No case can single-handedly prevent the catastrophic effects of climate change predicted by the government and scientists," she wrote. "The mere fact that this suit cannot alone halt climate change does not mean that it presents no claim suitable for judicial resolution." Dan Farber, a professor of law at the University of California, Berkeley, said the ruling closed the door on federal litigation seeking "courts to take bold action on climate change on their own." The judges on the panel were all appointed by President Barack Obama, a Democrat. US District Judge Ann Aiken in Eugene, Oregon, had allowed the case to go forward. Read more: ABS-CBN News
'OK Boomer' makes it to the US Supreme CourtWhat if a hiring person were to say, 'OK Boomer,' US Chief Justice John Roberts asked. 'Is that actionable?'
Tennis: Serena Williams returns to U.S. Fed Cup team
Senate passes US-Canada-Mexico trade deal, a Trump priorityWASHINGTON — The Senate overwhelmingly approved a new North American trade agreement Thursday that rewrites the rules of trade with Canada and Mexico and gives President Donald Trump a major
[OPINION | Point of Law] Challenges in business that cannot scare usThe message from the world is clear: unless we in the Philippines shape up, foreign investors will continue to view us as an unworthy investment destination. ThoughtLeaders
1st in PH Navy history: BRP Conrado Yap detects US submarine in PalawanBRP Conrado Yap, a Philippine Navy (PN) corvette, detected a United States submarine that was submerged in the waters of Palawan in November 2019, in what was regarded as the first ever submarine detection in the 121-year history of the country's naval warfare service. Matagal nilang ginagawa yan! Ngayon lang nasasabi dahil sa social media! Anti US paasooook! jorenilla Ok lang daw pag US ang mambabastos sa pinas. Anything about US is heaven according to some US bootlicking pinoys.
Historic Trump impeachment trial begins in US Senate Pasig Mayor Vico Sotto to Immigration bureau: Help us deport illegal Chinese workers Movie critical of Duterte gets disqualified from Sinag Maynila film festival Filipino movie about bullying wins award in France Who is Mommy Divine, Sarah Geronimo’s mother? Honda plant shutdown to have ‘minimal’ economic impact — Panelo [OPINYON] Utak o katawan? Celebrities congratulate newlyweds Sarah Geronimo, Matteo Guidicelli