OPINION | A lost cause [Static By Marvin Tort] READ:
In December, the Senate passed a bill on regulating “vaping,” or the sale and use of electronic cigarettes used to “smoke” or “vaporize” nicotine and non-nicotine products. The bill, which is yet to be signed by Malacañang into law, is being questioned by some medical groups, alleging that it paves the way for health risks.
I reckon the matter to be a lost cause for health advocates. Rather than veto the vaping bill, I am inclined to believe the President will actually let it lapse into law. In the first place, had there been strong reservations against its enactment, then executive action would have been swift. But, at this point, I don’t believe such action will be forthcoming.
Why the opposition to the bill? Well, the vaping bill covers the manufacture, use, sale, packaging, distribution, advertisement, and promotion of electronic nicotine and non-nicotine delivery systems (ENDS/ENNDS) and heated tobacco products (HTPs). The bill makes a regulatory distinction between vaping and cigarette or tobacco smoking.
Philippines sends note verbale to China after debris seizure in West PH Sea
The Marcos government says it wants clarification from China on the incident Read more >>
MWSS probes water output gaps; Maynilad cites weather - BusinessWorld OnlineTHE regulatory office of the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) said on Monday that it is probing the prolonged water service interruptions by Maynilad Water Services, Inc. READ:
Titlist Japan advances to quarters with win over Vietnam - BusinessWorld OnlineDEFENDING champion Japan beat Vietnam 3-0 at the Women’s Asian Cup in Pune on Monday to book their place in the quarterfinals alongside Australia and South Korea. READ:
Overtime rules come under fire after Chiefs win playoff thriller - BusinessWorld OnlineTHE National Football League’s (NFL) overtime rules have again come under fire after the Buffalo Bills’ high-powered offense never got a chance to touch the ball in the extra period of their crushing playoff loss to the Kansas City Chiefs. READ:
Not exactly the winner - BusinessWorld OnlineTHE recent award of a Nobel Prize to a Filipina brought out some hidden envy from those aspiring for that prestigious recognition for so long. Anyway, not winning something like the gold medal of a sports competition can still be soothing if one is in the finals, or the short list — the first Filipino to be accepted as a competitor in some hitherto unscaled international meet.
BoP surplus hits $1.35B, smallest since 2008 - BusinessWorld OnlineTHE PHILIPPINES’ balance of payments (BoP) position stood at a $1.345-billion surplus in 2021, its smallest since 2008, due to a wider trade deficit, according to the central bank. READ:
What makes us human - BusinessWorld OnlineTHE PURSUIT for perfection, the constant doubt of one’s inner beauty, and worthiness to be loved are some of the introspections that Norwegian singer-songwriter Aurora Aksnes sings about in her new album. READ:
Even the Department of Health (DoH) is against the enactment of the bill, claiming that some of its provisions contradict public health goals and international standards.“The investigation is being conducted primarily to determine whether there is a ground to declare Maynilad to have failed contractually on its service obligations, and to impose the appropriate penalties on the concessionaire,” the regulator said in a statement.Yui Narumiya scored twice, with her goals coming either side of an effort from former Asian Women’s Player of the Year Saki Kumagai.The game on Sunday was an instant classic between two of the most gifted NFL quarterbacks and included three lead changes in the final two minutes of regulation before Patrick Mahomes’ Chiefs prevailed 42-36 over Josh Allen’s Bills.
Unfortunately for those opposed to the vaping bill, time is not on their side. If the President does not veto it soon, the bill will simply lapse into law — questioned provisions and all. The plant is the first water treatment facility that taps into Laguna Lake as an alternative water source to Angat Dam. I reckon the matter to be a lost cause for health advocates. Narumiya beat Vietnam goalkeeper Tran Thi Kim Thanh to her left in the 58 th minute to put the seal on a comfortable win for the 2014 and 2018 winners. Rather than veto the vaping bill, I am inclined to believe the President will actually let it lapse into law. “Considering the corrective actions and long-term solutions being taken at the PWTP since the second quarter of 2021, the MWSS is expecting the PWTP to be operating at its maximum design of 300 millions of liter per day (MLD) and Maynilad to be complying with its service obligation of providing all customers with an uninterrupted supply of potable water at 7 pounds per square inch (psi) minimum pressure,” it added. In the first place, had there been strong reservations against its enactment, then executive action would have been swift. “If you are still arguing, in a game like that, it’s not in best interest of EVERYONE that both Mahomes and Allen get the ball in OT I don’t know what to tell you,” former NFL tight end Greg Olsen wrote on Twitter.
But, at this point, I don’t believe such action will be forthcoming. 6 to 22 and Dec. Chelsea midfielder Ji So-yun was instrumental in the second goal six minutes from time when her header back across the target brushed against defender Tun Khin Mo Mo before crossing the line via the inside of the post. Why the opposition to the bill? Well, the vaping bill covers the manufacture, use, sale, packaging, distribution, advertisement, and promotion of electronic nicotine and non-nicotine delivery systems (ENDS/ENNDS) and heated tobacco products (HTPs). The bill makes a regulatory distinction between vaping and cigarette or tobacco smoking. 15. For one, the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), and not the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), will take the lead in regulating the sale and use of such products as well as setting the standards for such products. Emily van Egmond and Mary Fowler were also on target as the Australians defeated a Philippines side directed by former Matildas coach Alen Stajčić. Health advocates believe that FDA has greater competence than DTI to assess the safety of vaping items, and thus should be the lead agency in regulating vaping. 21, it issued another notice asking the company to explain the reasons for the interruptions and its plan of action to remedy the situation. Five years ago, the New England Patriots beat the Atlanta Falcons when they scored on the opening drive of the only Super Bowl to go to overtime.
Under existing law, sale and use of cigarette and tobacco products are regulated by FDA and not DTI. The DoH is also involved in the process through an inter-agency committee on tobacco. It said water production from Laguna Lake had been affected by the northeast monsoon or hanging amihan “that has been pushing unusual amounts of sediment toward our Putatan treatment plants. Kanyanat Chetthabutr scored a hat trick before Dee Makris scored her side’s fourth as the Thais moved level on three points with the Philippines, with Australia on top of the group. However, if memory serves me, the Philippine Tobacco Institute has challenged in court FDA’s regulatory powers over the tobacco industry, and the matter is still in litigation. By shifting the regulatory authority over vaping products to the DTI from the FDA, lawmakers in effect are giving support to the tobacco industry’s legal argument that their members should be regulated by the Trade department and not by a health-related agency like FDA. Also, increased nutrients in the lake have been promoting the growth of algae that block the intake structure of our treatment facilities,” said Maynilad, which serves Metro Manila’s west zone. What happens then if the tobacco industry loses it case in court? Will a new law be required to put vaping products under the FDA? Instead of ensuring legislative consistency, it seems that lawmakers are just creating regulatory confusion. Australia qualifies for the World Cup as co-host while two other Asian nations will feature in an intercontinental playoff round.
Second, lawmakers have lowered the minimum age for persons allowed to purchase and use vaping products to 18 years from 21 years. Unfortunately, these extra interventions result in reduced water production, hence, the temporary rotating supply interruption. Existing regulation on cigarette sale and use, in contrast, is restricted to those 21 years old and above. Why the distinction? Frankly, I cannot understand why legislators lowered the vaping age restriction to 18. The water concessionaire said it is building a third treatment plant in Muntinlupa that will add another 150 MLD upon its completion in 2023. What purpose does this serve other than to broaden the vaping market? Also, vaping products are sold as nicotine- and non-nicotine delivery systems. I do not think sellers will make the strict distinction of selling only non-nicotine products to those aged 18-21. We are doing our best to mitigate the effects on our customers of these natural and man-made causes.
Thus, by lowering the age restriction, the bill now makes nicotine products accessible even to those aged lower than 21. Who benefits from this? And, how does this protect the youth from nicotine use and abuse? It is not enough that legislators restricted the sale and distribution of vaping products to entities registered with the DTI or the Securities and Exchange Commission. Metro Pacific Investments Corp. This will not in any way end illicit trade of vaping products online and through social media marketplaces. The unscrupulous will find the means and ways to distribute vaping products, even illegally, for a profit. Ltd. Worse, unlike cigarettes and tobacco products, legislators also allowed the advertisement of vaping products, as long as celebrities or social media influencers are not be used as product endorsers; advertisements do not undermine quit-smoking messages; and, advertisements do not encourage non-tobacco or non-nicotine users to use vape.
Why even allow vaping products to be advertised in the first place? Advertising serves no other purpose than to market products and boost sales. and PLDT, Inc. I cannot understand why legislators are allowing vaping advertisements after they already banned, in preceding legislation, the advertisement of cigarettes and tobacco products, including their sponsorship of events. Cigarette packs even carry graphic warnings on the hazards of cigarette and tobacco use., a unit of PLDT Beneficial Trust Fund subsidiary MediaQuest Holdings, Inc. I am uncertain if the same is required for packaging of vaping products. Sad to say, all these concerns are now water under the bridge. — Luisa Maria Jacinta C.
In all probability, despite questions on some of its provisions, the vaping bill is as good as law. In just a matter of days, without any presidential action against it, the vaping bill will become law. And I second the opinion of some lawmakers that the vaping bill is more a trade measure than a health measure. As I have written previously, while I initially supported the creation of the legal distinction between cigarettes and vaping products, I have since changed my mind, having come to the belated conclusion that the two are practically the same. At this point, I prefer that government completely ban all forms or manner of smoking and vaping.
Smoking or vaping, in my opinion, have no known public benefits other than being a source of jobs and government revenue. However, a complete ban is wishful thinking. Such a ban crosses into the realm of freedom of choice and individual rights and liberties. But, I limit my tolerance of the tobacco and e-cigarette industries only because of the jobs and taxes they can generate. In this line, lawmakers should strictly limit smoking and electronic cigarette use at least to those 21 years and older.
And all sales packs for tobacco and vaping products should carry graphic warnings on the ills of smoking and vaping. Moreover, all forms of sponsorship and advertising should be banned for both tobacco and vaping products. And, the FDA — and not the DTI — should be the lead agency regulating the sale and use of cigarettes, tobacco, and vaping products. I believe that the ultimate objective of any smoking or vaping regulation should be the protection of public health, to reduce the number of related illnesses and deaths as well as public health insurance and public healthcare costs. While tobacco and e-cigarette industries generate jobs and taxes, this should be secondary to public health considerations.
In this line, regular and electronic cigarettes — whether or not they use nicotine — should be at par, and should be regulated and taxed the same way, or at least subjected to the similar regulations and parameters for sale and use, and marketing. They should both be regulated similarly, for their “negative externalities.” Their tax revenue potential should be incidental. But lawmakers seem to believe that there is distinction and difference between the two, and chooses to “legislate” that distinction by un-levelling the playing field. As drafted, their proposed law on vaping seems to give unwarranted or undue advantage to the vaping industry vis-à-vis the cigarette industry, by allowing their sale to those aged 18-20 and by allowing advertising.
In Makati City, the Makati Parking Authority has put up “no smoking” and “no vaping” signs on sidewalks in the Central Business District. The city does not make any distinction between the two. After all, second-hand smoke from smokers and vapers alike are also scientifically known to possibly transmit the coronavirus to non-smokers. Simply put, e-cigarettes or vaping products and regular cigarettes are just the two hands of the same body. We shouldn’t treat them differently.
Marvin Tort is a former managing editor of BusinessWorld, and a former chairman of the Philippine Press Council .