WASHINGTON—In a controversial 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled Monday that any American who underwent a legal abortion under Roe v. Wade must now be re-impregnated. “Any U.S.
citizen who terminated a pregnancy during the nearly 50 years that it was nationally legal must immediately report to a governmental agency or Catholic hospital to be re-impregnated,” read the conservative-led decision penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, which went on to explain that now that the highest court in the land has negated bodily autonomy as a constitutional right and made it vastly difficult to find reproductive care, they finally have time to work backwards in punishing anyone...
“Frankly, after working tirelessly with local and state governments to all but sever the ability of an American woman of child-bearing age to retain authority over her own uterus, it brings me great pleasure to right this wrong once and for all by undoing the long-completed lawful abortions of the Roe era. My colleagues and I have pored over the precedent texts and ultimately determined that having an empty womb does not number among the rights detailed in the U.S.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
The nonstop sparring match between the conservative justice and liberal Biden attorney at the Supreme CourtJustice Samuel Alito is the tip of the spear for conservatives challenging the Biden administration during oral arguments at the Supreme Court.
Read more »
Carluccio, McCaffery battling for spot on Pa. Supreme CourtThe deadline to register to vote in the November municipal elections is Oct. 23.
Read more »
Opinion: The Supreme Court may make America’s gun violence problem even worseAs the Supreme Court hears arguments this week in United States v. Rahimi, a case that will decide if states can continue to prevent those accused of domestic violence from possessing firearms, ani-gun violence activist Shannon Watts writes that it’s time for the gun safety movement to get to work on efforts to expand the size of the Court.
Read more »
Guns rights and domestic violence protections collide at US Supreme CourtWhen a New Orleans-based appeals court struck down a federal law aimed at protecting victims of domestic violence from firearms - a matter that the U.S. Supreme Court takes up on Tuesday - Phil Sorrells, the conservative gun-owning Tarrant County district attorney in Texas, disagreed.
Read more »
Supreme Court should protect domestic violence victims from guns, even if the founders didn'tThe upcoming case United States vs. Rahimi gives the justices a chance to correct a contorted approach to the 2nd Amendment — and save lives.
Read more »
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Assault Weapons Ban Passed After Highland Park Shooting'This is a significant victory for the movement for gun safety and getting semiautomatic rifles off our streets,' said Parkland survivor and March for Our Lives co-founder David Hogg.
Read more »