Poor Safety Ratings for Tesla's Autopilot and Other Self-Driving Systems

Technology News

Poor Safety Ratings for Tesla's Autopilot and Other Self-Driving Systems
SafetyAssessmentPartial Automated Driving Systems
  • 📰 Forbes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 23 sec. here
  • 23 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 85%
  • Publisher: 53%

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety gave poor safety ratings to several self-driving systems, including Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving functions. This raises concerns about the safety of automated features on highways. The assessment covered 14 partial driving automation features from BMW, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Tesla, and Volvo. None of the systems received a good rating, with the Lexus LS Teammate system being rated as the best with an acceptable rating. The GMC Sierra and Nissan Ariya offered self-driving systems with marginal ratings. The IIHS emphasized the need for driver involvement and attention despite the systems being marketed as self-driving.

A first-ever safety assessment of partial automated driving systems by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety gave “poor” safety ratings to several big name self-driving systems , including Tesla’s Autopilot and Full Self-Driving functions—adding fresh safety concerns as automated features continue to roll out on highways.14 partial driving automation features and gave 11 of them “poor” ratings, covering features from BMW , Ford , Mercedes-Benz , Nissan , Tesla and Volvo .

None of the automation systems received the highest possible rating of “good”—the Lexus LS Teammate system was rated the best with “acceptable” and the GMC Sierra and Nissan Ariya both offered self-driving systems rated “marginal.”many features related to driver involvement and attention when the automation is engaged, with the IIHS arguing while often billed as “self-driving,” these automation systems still require human engagemen

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

Forbes /  🏆 394. in US

Safety Assessment Partial Automated Driving Systems Insurance Institute For Highway Safety Poor Ratings Self-Driving Systems Tesla Autopilot Full Self-Driving Concerns Highways BMW Ford Mercedes-Benz Nissan Volvo Lexus LS Teammate GMC Sierra Nissan Ariya Driver Involvement Attention Human Engagement

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Tesla Crashes Into Tesla, Then Crashes Into Another TeslaTesla Crashes Into Tesla, Then Crashes Into Another TeslaAlso, another Tesla was involved but didn’t get mixed up in the crash.
Read more »

Tesla Crashes Into Tesla, Then Crashes Into Another TeslaTesla Crashes Into Tesla, Then Crashes Into Another TeslaAlso, another Tesla was involved but didn’t get mixed up in the crash.
Read more »

Next Autopilot trial to test Tesla's blame-the-driver defenseThe latest case brought against Tesla Autopilot involves a highway accident near San Francisco that killed Apple engineer Walter Huang.
Read more »

Why Ford’s Tesla Charging Adapter is Good for Tesla, Ford and the EV IndustryWhy Ford’s Tesla Charging Adapter is Good for Tesla, Ford and the EV IndustryClean Tech News & Views: EVs, Solar Energy, Batteries
Read more »

Tesla: It's Okay to Double-Park At Supercharger Stalls In A Non-TeslaTesla: It's Okay to Double-Park At Supercharger Stalls In A Non-TeslaFord owners will soon have access to Tesla's Superchargers, but due to the location of Ford's charge ports, Tesla recommends that owners double park to charge.
Read more »

Tesla: It's Okay to Double-Park At Supercharger Stalls In A Non-TeslaTesla: It's Okay to Double-Park At Supercharger Stalls In A Non-TeslaFord owners will soon have access to Tesla's Superchargers, but due to the location of Ford's charge ports, Tesla recommends that owners double park to charge.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-27 08:34:06