Wojcicki explains the decision to leave Crowder’s video on YouTube as a matter of consistency. “It’s just from a policy standpoint we need to be consistent — if we took down that content, there would be so much other content that we need to take down,” she said.
The defense offered by fans of Crowder’s channel is that the nature of his conservative videos is purely satirical. According to the YouTube CEO, it’s all a matter of context. What about rap videos and their derogatory lyrics, or even other videos that contain inappropriate humour? She further explained that YouTube tries not to alter its policies in a knee-jerk reaction, but is that really what this is? In an interview with, Maza claimed that YouTube’s interpretation of its policies would mean that videos would only ever be taken down if creators actually direct their audiences to harass someone else.
Maza has also repeatedly stated that YouTube’s supposed support of the LGBTQ community stinks of hypocrisy, with LGBTQ creators being supposedly used to showcase the company’s support of the community—all in the name of advertising and capital gain. Yes, YouTube is a private company. Yes, they aren’t legally bound to remove videos. But, at the same time, the resulting outcry to their decision is also justified. After all, what’s the point of having policies if you aren’t going to enforce them?YouTube has decided not to punish Crowder, after he spent two years harassing me for being gay and Latino.
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Soya_Cincau - 🏆 16. / 55 Read more »
Source: malaysiakini - 🏆 20. / 51 Read more »
Source: fmtoday - 🏆 5. / 72 Read more »
Source: fmtoday - 🏆 5. / 72 Read more »
Source: msianinsight - 🏆 8. / 63 Read more »
Source: fmtoday - 🏆 5. / 72 Read more »