However, here are some points to consider.Drinking alcohol is not the same as eating a doughnut.When reviewing the need to ban or restrict substances, each product needs to be viewed and reviewed in isolation and in context.
Utilising the ‘slippery slope’ argument, some argue that sugar may eventually be banned too due to its negative health effects. However, unlike smoking, sugar can be consumed in moderation to no ill effect. — Photos: TNSWhenever a decision needs to be made that may restrict individual liberties, it has to be balanced against public safety and the good of the community.
In other words, smoking not only takes away one’s freedom of choice, but also literally changes the brain of young smokers.It is for this reason that companies target younger customers.Almost all smokers do not want their children or loved ones to start smoking, knowing what it is like to have a psychosocial dependence on a product that is actively killing you.“Younger adult smokers have been the critical factor in the growth and decline of every major brand and company over the last 50 years.
Nicotine addiction can literally rewire the brain, especially in young smokers, taking away their freedom to quit smoking easily.In 2018, the world’s six largest cigarette manufacturers made profits of more than USD55 billion .
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: staronline - 🏆 4. / 75 Read more »
Source: malaymail - 🏆 1. / 86 Read more »
Source: malaymail - 🏆 1. / 86 Read more »
Source: msianinsight - 🏆 8. / 63 Read more »