Despite being identical in respect to its AD103 GPU, the same 16GB GDDR6X graphics memory, and the same 4nm Ada Lovelace architecture, the differences between these two GeForce RTX 4080 lie squarely in what their manufacturers have fitted them with.I’ll come right out the front and say it: ASUS’ current iteration of the ROG Strix cooler design is literally the most symmetrical and square design I have ever seen on a graphics card.
Of course, as with all modern graphics cards, ASUS’s ROG Strix RTX 4080 does have RGB; the LEDs are primarily positioned at the rim of the card’s edge – you can’t miss it, the LED strips are literally wrapped around it and are even encased around in a thin layered of acryllic glass. For another matter, the logo on the spine also lights up but can also be turned off when needed.
Compared to ASUS’ high-end RTX 4080 offering, Gigabyte’s AORUS Master iteration of the card actually bares a lot less in terms of its cooler shroud design. It still looks square-ish, and it also adopts the extended, or rather, protruding heatsink, which is double the actual length of the PCB. For that matter, the GPU’s parent company has chosen not to partially expose the back of the GPU die and instead keep it covered with the backplate.
back at the end of last year. It seems logical, given that the red chipmaker had openly proclaimed that its top-tier card would give NVIDIA’s second-most powerful consumer GPU a run for its money.In my review, the match between ASUS’ and Gigabyte’s RTX 4080 is kind of hit-or-miss and that’s for both synthetic and real-world benchmarks. In 3DMark, the DirectX 11-based tests, such as Fire Strike, clearly show the ASUS ROG Strix model gradually overtaking Gigabyte’s AORUS Master.
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Soya_Cincau - 🏆 16. / 55 Read more »