Lead defence lawyer Ranjit Singh Dhillon, with lawyers Yagoo Subramaniam and Maanveer Singh Dhillon .
Later, a government chemist also told the High Court there was not enough DNA evidence on a crash helmet allegedly used by the assailants to hit Nhaveen, but there were bloodstains on the shirt of one of the accused. Shanti strongly objected, saying her son was not involved in gangs. She said she knew Nhaveen’s whereabouts all the time and that the photograph was taken during a jogathon event some years back.
A picture of Nhaveen with a friend taken from his Facebook page. A defence lawyer claimed were flashing the 04 gang signs. He said Penang Hospital forensic specialist Dr Amir Saad Abdul Rahim had testified on Monday that there was no anal tear or penetration found during post-mortem. Dr Priya, she said, was among many consultant neurologists at the hospital who had treated Nhaveen for a “blood clot” in his brain, which was detected when he was 17.
Later, Chemistry Department science officer Jacqueline Bernice John Bosco took the stand, saying that DNA evidence had been obtained from items such as a crash helmet, shoe, clothing, a glass bottle and other items suspected to have been used in the murder.
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.