Federal Court dismisses NFCorp executive chairman's appeal in defamation suit against Rafizi
PUTRAJAYA: Former Pandan member of Parliament Mohd Rafizi Ramli is not liable for defaming National Feedlot Corporation Sdn Bhd ( NFCorp) executive chairman Datuk Seri Dr Mohamad Salleh Ismail and his company over his statements relating to alleged misuse of government funds, the Federal Court ruled on Thursday (April 21).
In the court's decision, Justice Azahar, said the statement made by Mohd Rafizi was without malice and that Mohd Rafizi could resort to defence of fair comment to defeat the defamation suit filed against him.Justice Azahar said the High Court had made a finding that Mohd Rafizi was not motivated by malice when making the alleged defamatory statements.
Justice Azahar also said that there was sufficient substratum of facts to warrant Mohd Rafizi to make the statements.He said it was also the finding of the High Court that Mohd Rafizi had an honest belief that his allegations were true and that he was performing a public duty in agitating for greater accountability for public funds.Read more: The Star »
Home Ministry mobilises agencies to assist Baling flood victims
KUALA LUMPUR: The Home Ministry has mobilised all its agencies through ‘Op Bantu Baling’ to coordinate assistance and rescue operations for flood victims in Baling, Kedah. Read more >>
Federal Court dismisses NFCorp executive chairman’s appeal in defamation suit against Rafizi | Malay MailKUALA LUMPUR, April 21 ― The Federal Court today ruled in favour of former Pandan MP Rafizi Ramli in the defamation suit brought by the National Feedlot Corporation (NFCorp) and its executive chairman Datuk Seri Mohamad Salleh Ismail over the former’s remark on the alleged misuse of government...
Federal Court rules Rafizi made 'fair comment' against NFCorp, chairperson'He's entitled to express freely on a matter of public interest.' Akhirnya kebenaran tertegak. Anjing2 UMNO masih dapat upah kencing Melayu, mungkin dh lupa pasal NFC. Melayu pula terus dikencing anjing2 UMNO.
Indian court stays demolition of shops in sensitive area of New DelhiNEW DELHI (Reuters) - India's Supreme Court stayed demolition of small, illegal retail shops in the wake of communal violence in New Delhi, shortly after civil authorities began tearing down the structures under protection of police and security forces.
Hong Kong court jails former radio host for seditionHONG KONG (Bloomberg): A Hong Kong court handed a 40-month prison sentence to the first person convicted under a colonial-era sedition law since the handover to China, a sign authorities intend to dish out stiff punishments for critical speech as part of a broader political crackdown.
KPMG replaced as 1MDB auditor due to ‘impasse’, court toldKUALA LUMPUR: The High Court was told that KPMG was replaced as the auditor of 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) due to an “impasse” that could not be resolved between the audit firm and the company. Billion Dollar Whale : The Story of Jho Low by Tom Wright & Bradley Hope - The Summary -
Appeals court rejects youth’s reduced jail-time plea | The Malaysian InsightJudge says jail sentences imposed commensurate with offences committed.
Following which, a three-man panel led by Chief Judge of Malaya Azahar Mohamed dismissed the appeals brought by Mohamad Salleh and his company and ordered him to pay cost of RM70,000 to Mohd Rafizi.Telegram channel for the latest updates..The drive to demolish the properties came four days after violence there during a Hindu religious procession.
In the court's decision, Justice Azahar, said the statement made by Mohd Rafizi was without malice and that Mohd Rafizi could resort to defence of fair comment to defeat the defamation suit filed against him. Justice Azahar said the High Court had made a finding that Mohd Rafizi was not motivated by malice when making the alleged defamatory statements. Both Mohamad Salleh and NFCorp were seeking to reinstate the decision of the High Court which had previously ordered Mohd Rafizi to pay RM200,000 in damages after allowing their defamation suit against him (Mohd Rafizi), which had been overturned by the Appellate Court in an earlier verdict . Justice Azahar also said that there was sufficient substratum of facts to warrant Mohd Rafizi to make the statements. He said it was also the finding of the High Court that Mohd Rafizi had an honest belief that his allegations were true and that he was performing a public duty in agitating for greater accountability for public funds. “In this regard, it must be emphasised that the High Court made an expressed finding that the respondent (Rafizi) was not motivated by malice in making the defamatory statement. "In my view, the respondent's (Mohd Rafizi) conclusion that public fund had been misused as a leverage for the Public Bank's loan was an opinion and inferences that a fair-minded person would have honestly made. The civil authority leading the demolition, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), is governed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
"Therefore, Mohd Rafizi could not be liable for damages for defamation," said Justice Azahar. In this regard, Azahar further noted that it is trite law that the proof of malice defeats the defence of fair comment since a comment made maliciously is not fair comment. Federal Court judges Zaleha Yusof and Zabariah Mohd Yusof concurred with Justice Azahar's decision. Mohamad Salleh and NFCorp filed a lawsuit against Mohd Rafizi in 2013 over his (Mohd Rafizi) statements made on March 7, 2012 at a media conference at the PKR office, alleging that Mohamad Salleh and his company had used a RM71mil government loan as collateral to purchase eight office units in KL Eco City. I agree with the order of the Court of Appeal though on substantially different grounds. Mohamad Salleh and NFCorp initially won the suit in the High Court in 2016 where the court ordered Mohd Rafizi to pay RM150,000 in damages to Mohamad Salleh and RM50,000 to the company for defamation. However, in 2019, the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Mohd Rafizi after setting aside the High Court's order that he pay RM200,000 in damages to Mohamad Salleh and his company. Lawyers Ranjit Singh and Razlan Hadri Zulkifli appeared for Rafizi while Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah represented Mohamad Salleh and NFCorp in today’s hearing. "We are here to provide protection, and to maintain law and order," said Deependra Pathak, a senior police official at the site.
In 2020, the Federal Court granted leave to Mohamad Salleh and NFCorp to pursue their appeal in the Federal Court after Mohd Rafizi's lawyers did not object to the leave application as several grounds of the appellate court's decision relied on issues that were not raised in their case. Lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah represented Mohamad Salleh and NFCorp, while Mohd Rafizi was represented by lawyers Razlan Hadri Zulkifli and Ranjit Singh. The former PKR vice president alleged that Mohamad Salleh and NFCorp had used a RM71 million government loan as collateral to purchase properties in KL Eco City. - Bernama Article type: free .