Concord loses appeal as tycoons clash over Vancouver icon - Bloomberg
(Jan 19): A Canadian appeals court ruled against Concord Pacific Group, one of the country’s biggest property developers, in its long-running dispute with Singapore tycoon Oei Hong Leong over a failed US$1.1 billion waterfront deal in Vancouver.The future of the site — a singular, undeveloped swathe in the heart of one of the world’s most expensive cities — remains cloudy. Concord Pacific is seeking to appeal to Canada’s top court, prolonging the tussle, while the ruling may create uncertainty
A majority decision by British Columbia’s Court of Appeal on Tuesday rejected Concord Pacific’s attempt to overturn a 2019 ruling that had dismissed its claim against Oei and his associated company. Concord claimed they breached an agreement to build out the lucrative site.
Oei said in a statement he was glad the legal process was coming to an end. It may not yet: Concord Pacific said it intends to seek permission to appeal to Canada’s Supreme Court.Few sites match the potential of the nearly empty 13-acre waterfront tract. Few, too, are as storied.
Selangor International Business Summit 2022 | Selangor Summit
Selangor International Business Summit 2022 welcomes all of you to experience a plethora of exciting events lined up just for you. Read more >>
'Main belakang': Feb 7 verdict on KJ’s appeal against Anwar’s suitThis comes after the Court of Appeal hears submissions from both parties. Even though Mr. Khairy doing a good job for his minister role, but he himself got the position because the government 'main belakang', isn't it? Boleh ke orang kata, KJ ni kaki main belakang bila lihat cara dia berpolitik dalam UMNO? 🤔 Anak abah
After crushing defeat in state polls, Sarawak pro-independence party gears up for GE15 | The Malaysian InsightAfter crushing defeat in state polls, Sarawak pro-independence party gears up for GE15
Kyrgios climbs off Covid sick bed to set up Medvedev clash | Malay MailMELBOURNE, Jan 18 — Nick Kyrgios put behind “17 hours a day” in bed with Covid to set up a blockbuster second-round showdown with tournament favourite Daniil Medvedev at the Australian Open today. The unpredictable Australian breezed through a straight-sets win over Britain’s Liam Broady...
Feb 7 decision on Khairy’s appeal against Anwar’s defamation suit | The Malaysian InsightThree-member bench hears submissions from both parties in virtual proceedings today.
Appeals court acquits Wildlife Dept officer accused of submitting false claims | The Malaysian InsightAppeals court acquits Wildlife Dept officer accused of submitting false claims
Appeals Court acquits Perhilitan officer accused of submitting false claimsPUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has set aside a four-year jail sentence and RM117,000 fine on a Wildlife and National Parks Department (Perhilitan) officer from Peninsular Malaysia, who was previously convicted on charges of submitting false claims.
A (Jan 19): A Canadian appeals court ruled against Concord Pacific Group, one of the country’s biggest property developers, in its long-running dispute with Singapore tycoon Oei Hong Leong over a failed US$1..× Copy URL UNDETERRED by its losses in the Sarawak elections last month, the bruised and battered Parti Bumi Kenyalang (PBK) still believes in its independence agenda and is already rallying for the general election expected next year.Telegram channel for the latest updates.
1 billion waterfront deal in Vancouver. The future of the site — a singular, undeveloped swathe in the heart of one of the world’s most expensive cities — remains cloudy. Concord Pacific is seeking to appeal to Canada’s top court, prolonging the tussle, while the ruling may create uncertainty for large, complex projects in the region. Sign-up now and enjoy one (1) week free access!. A majority decision by British Columbia’s Court of Appeal on Tuesday rejected Concord Pacific’s attempt to overturn a 2019 ruling that had dismissed its claim against Oei and his associated company. Concord claimed they breached an agreement to build out the lucrative site. There was doubt he would even make it to Melbourne Park, but in his first match since September he showed little effect of the inactivity and illness.
Two judges backed the lower court’s earlier decision, which concluded their pact wasn’t legally binding. But the third, Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein, issued a strongly worded dissenting opinion, warning that the outcome “could have an enormous impact on the business community” and that the initial judge had made “inextricable errors”. She said the court’s findings could leave initial commercial agreements in complex, multiyear, multibillion-dollar projects meaningless or uncertain. “This is untenable,” she wrote. Oei said in a statement he was glad the legal process was coming to an end. “I was obviously concerned that I wouldn’t be physically ready to play, I took it day by day and I’m just so pumped to be here in my first match of the year, on my most favourite court in the entire world.
It may not yet: Concord Pacific said it intends to seek permission to appeal to Canada’s Supreme Court. The dispute stretches back to 2015, when Oei and Concord Pacific Chief Executive Officer Terry Hui signed an initial agreement that envisioned jointly developing the site. The partnership had plans for a C$1.4 billion (US$1.1 billion), 2 million-square-foot condo development, but the deal quickly soured and triggered lawsuits within months. — AFP You May Also Like.
The ensuing legal battle stretched across to Singapore courts, embroiled a Hong Kong executive at Deutsche Bank AG, and provided a rare glimpse into the backroom dealings of Vancouver’s high-stakes development industry. Iconic site Few sites match the potential of the nearly empty 13-acre waterfront tract. Few, too, are as storied. Known as the Plaza of Nations, the site was centre stage for a World Expo in 1986 that helped put the coastal Canadian city on the radar of Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing, who snapped up the fairgrounds for C$320 million and set up Concord Pacific to redevelop the sprawling lands. Investors and immigrants from Asia followed his lead, setting off a three-decade property boom that profoundly reshaped the city physically, demographically and economically.
Among those was Oei, who bought the Plaza of Nations site from Li for C$40 million in 1989. Oei told the court he bought the plot as a long-term investment he could live off to allow him “to retire and live in Vancouver”. It would turn out to be a remarkable bet. As Concord Pacific developed the surrounding swathe of lands into a thicket of gleaming luxury condos, Oei bided his time, leaving the parcel virtually untouched as it turned into one of the potentially most lucrative development sites on the continent. In the spring of 2015, Oei — a dealmaker who had no experience in real estate development — began to look for a local partner to build out the site.
He began sounding out Vancouver’s most prominent developers, including the billionaire Aquilini family, Ian Gillespie’s Westbank Corp and Concord Pacific, which Li had exited by that point and was headed by Hui. Oei and Hui, both of Chinese descent, shared cultural ties, communicating in Mandarin, and were linked by family connections — Oei was friends with Hui’s father. By May of that year, the two had struck what Oei called a “happy price”, valuing his land at C$500 million. They signed an initial agreement that would see Concord Pacific take a 50% stake in an Oei-controlled company owning the tract. But it was also a peculiar match.
Oei had his education cut short when he was sent to labour in the countryside during China’s Cultural Revolution in the 1960s. In time, he returned to the family business in his country of birth, Indonesia, then in 1980, at the age of 32, he struck out for Singapore, where he built a fortune in mergers and acquisitions. His business style was to bypass paperwork and formalities, cutting rapid deals on the basis of personal relationships — he struck the deal to buy the Plaza of Nations plot from Li in five minutes, he once told the South China Morning Post . Hui, by contrast, was a US college-educated engineer who’d evolved into one of Canada’s most sophisticated developers. Known to sport spiky black hair, skateboard in his suit, and kitesurf on Vancouver’s beaches, he once told the National Pos t he loves “anything with speed and a lot of fun”.
The partnership quickly soured. The two sides wrangled over the capital gains tax liabilities of a site that had appreciated C$460 million in two decades. They couldn’t agree on how to share the costs of hefty concessions to be made to the City of Vancouver in return for favourable zoning rules to maximise the project’s profitability. Binding or not? By late 2015, Oei had brought two lawsuits in Singapore against Concord Pacific, alleging the developer had failed to make payments in breach of their agreement. Concord Pacific, in turn, filed suit in October 2015 in Canada, accusing Oei and his company of violating the pact.
The two-page pact signed by Oei and Hui had read, “This agreement is binding.” Nevertheless, in July 2019, Supreme Court of British Columbia Justice Peter Voith sided with Oei, concluding that it wasn’t binding because the document lacked terms essential to a properly formed contract. He also scathingly described a Concord vice president and Hui’s key negotiator as “dishonest” in his trial testimony. However, the nearly 50-day trial and thousands of pages of witness testimony and evidence — including from a Deutsche Bank executive — showed Oei wasn’t always forthright. The 2019 ruling acknowledged that when Oei tried to obtain financing for the partnership with Deutsche Bank, he asked the lender to conceal details of the loan’s structure from Hui.
Concord argued that Oei did so in an effort to set up a structure that would give Oei ultimate control and hold Hui personally liable at anytime if things went awry. Deutsche Bank refused to go along, saying it couldn’t agree to withholding such disclosures, Hui baulked at placing personal guarantees, and the partnership failed. Deutsche Bank spokespeople didn’t immediately respond to a request seeking comment. It also emerged that Oei, after signing the agreement with Hui, had proceeded to negotiate a deal with the Aquilini family valuing the Plaza of Nations land at C$450 million. Oei contended that wasn’t in breach and that he was upfront about simultaneously exploring a backup partner.
Further clouds linger over the property. Oei and his associated companies face a separate claim filed in 2019 by a smaller Vancouver developer, Li Lin, who says they struck an agreement to develop the tract in 2017. Lin alleges that Oei promised to arrange a bank loan but deliberately caused the lender to reject the request in order to force him out of the deal. It would turn out the proposed lender was, again, Deutsche Bank, according to Oei’s response to the claim. Oei denies the allegation or any wrongdoing.
A trial is scheduled to begin in January next year. Meanwhile, a shuttered casino, concrete lot, and 57 lonely flagpoles occupy the Plaza of Nations site — an oddly desolate and unsightly blemish interrupting the stretch of gleaming glass towers, luxury yachts, and emerald parks lining Vancouver’s picturesque waterfront. Oei said in his statement Tuesday that the project is in the final stages of permitting. It’s not clear who next may step forward, if anyone, to join Oei to build it. As Gillespie, one of the main contenders initially passed over by Oei, said in a 2018 affidavit: “This is a highly competitive industry with a narrow range of competitors.
” And so awaits the centrepiece of the Expo boom that set off Vancouver’s three-decade transformation into a glittering cosmopolis — a lingering holdout from its quiet, small-town past before the world’s tycoons descended. Subscribe to Mid-day email alert We deliver news to your inbox daily .