EPA ‘kicked the stool’ from under peat company seeking extraction licence, High Court hears

  • 📰 thejournal_ie
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 77 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 34%
  • Publisher: 50%

Ireland Headlines News

Ireland Latest News,Ireland Headlines

EPA ‘kicked the stool’ from under peat company seeking extraction licence, High Court hears:

The Four Courts in Dublin Image: Sam Boal/RollingNews.ie The Four Courts in Dublin Image: Sam Boal/RollingNews.ie ONE OF THE country’s largest suppliers of peat to the mushroom industry argued before the High Court today that the Environmental Protection Agency erred in law in its refusal to examine its application for a peat extraction licence.

Harte Peat is challenging the lawfulness of the Agency’s decision, with Michael McDowell SC arguing on behalf of his client that the EPA erred in law in its conclusion that planning permission was required.Central to Harte Peat’s argument is that it is exempt from the need for planning permission as peat extraction commenced on the bogs prior to 1964 when modern planning laws were introduced.

McDowell argued on Friday, however, that the fact that an EIA is required does not mean that pre-1964 activity requires planning permission. He argued that a “fundamental mistake of law was being made by the EPA” as it is “conflating the notion of pre ’64 development with exempted development”. In his closing comments, McDowell argued that the suggestion the development consent requirement under the EIA Directive can only be achieved through planning permission from a local authority is “wholly untrue and incorrect”.

While planning permission alone would not constitute development consent, he said, EPA licensing alone would also not be considered development consent. McDowell argued that Harte Peat’s application was made in “good faith” during a period when peat operations were deemed to be wholly exempt from the need for planning permission.

McDowell said that the EPA then decided in November 2020 “to refuse point blank to consider our EPA application” on the basis that Harte Peat could not show any evidence of active planning permission, or that it was in the process of seeking permission.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

It's it not better for bogs to be left alone for the moment for carbon sequestration

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 32. in İE

Ireland Latest News, Ireland Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Five challenges to Meath development plan to be heard by commercial courtCases will be heard by court dealing with commercial planning and strategic infrastructure matters
Source: IrishTimesBiz - 🏆 6. / 77 Read more »

Lisa Smith was vulnerable and ‘wanted to belong’, opening day of trial toldLisa Smith was a vulnerable, isolated person who “wanted to belong”, the trial of the former Defence Forces member has heard on its opening day Correct, like many thousands of women and children indoctrinated and used by Sinn Fein/PIRA... We all want to belong but we all don't join isis to bloody do so. And of all the options available she chose beheaders.
Source: IrishTimes - 🏆 3. / 98 Read more »

Defective school built in ‘record’ 20 weeks instead of 60, High Court told‘Breakneck speed’ created risk of shoddy work which Minister’s engineers had duty to monitor , judge hears 'Extraordinary feature of Western Building Systems’ defence was it denied there was implied term that schools wld be structurally safe. The idea that company would take on building 42 schools and not think it was responsible for making them structurally safe was “staggering”. theskibeagle Haste makes waste
Source: IrishTimes - 🏆 3. / 98 Read more »