Opinion: The Supreme Court’s ruling to end the death-in-prison penalty isn’t about the offender – it’s about our own moral code

  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 47 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 92%

Canada Headlines News

Canada Latest News,Canada Headlines

The Supreme Court’s ruling to end the death-in-prison penalty isn’t about the offender – it’s about our own moral code

Under the Harper-era law, judges were given the power to “stack” the 25-year period of parole ineligibility that applies to first-degree murder. In theory, Mr. Bissonnette, 27 at the time of his offence, could have received 150 years in prison before being eligible for parole. The average life expectancy of inmates who die of natural causes is 60.

, is whether a penal method is “intrinsically incompatible with human dignity.” Consider the obvious examples of lobotomy, castration, capital punishment and indefinite solitary confinement. These penalties are clearly beyond the pale, no matter the offence and no matter the offender. The Court has now held that a penalty of death-in-prison – imprisonment without a realistic hope of review – is similarly “degrading and dehumanizing.

A very small number of inmates serving life sentences in Canadian penitentiaries have murdered multiple people. Invariably, they face a profoundly uphill battle at their parole hearings. As a starting point, they need an extraordinary record of good behaviour, meaningful insight into their offences and deep remorse. Many will never be released by a parole board that is focused on public safety. But the Court’s decision means they must have a realistic opportunity to ask.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

The Supreme Court of Canada's statement that 'all human beings carry with them a capacity for rehabilitation ' is very questionable when it comes to dangerous, violent offenders. What evidence is there to support that proposition ?

Cold and calculated. During his time off, he would regularly visit Islamophobic websites and search the Web for information on mass shooters. On the day of the shooting, he had breakfast while reading web content dealing with jihadi attacks, mass murder, and suicide. 1/2

acoyne Andrew, it’s also pragmatic. The faint hope clause keep prisoners on their best behaviour. It lowers fights in prison, lowers risk of death and injuries of guards

acoyne Bullshit! It’s nothing more than progressive woke garbage - those mass killers have no right to be alive let alone free ever again - what a disgrace Canada is becoming

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in CA

Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rules Quebec City mosque killer to be eligible for parole in 25 yearsThe dead got life without parole. Remember? 🤡 Yes because the civil rights of someone who murdered someone is more important than those of his victim Does it matter? The board will NEVER let this guy out.
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

Mosque shooter Bissonnette can apply for parole after 25 years, Supreme Court rulesIn its unanimous decision today, the high court declares unconstitutional a 2011 Criminal Code provision that allowed a judge, in the event of multiple…
Source: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Read more »

Quebec mosque disappointed with Supreme Court ruling that allows shooter to seek parole after 25 yearsThe Islamic Cultural Centre of Quebec says the Supreme Court decision did not give due consideration to ‘the atrocity and scourge of multiple murders’ or to the hateful, Islamophobic, racist nature of the crime Canada’s justice system is a joke!! Why don't you thank the Liberal 'hug a thug' crime policies? Supreme Court decision is flawed. Wanting to avoid Unusual cruelty ? The 5 dead and 8 wounded at the mosque were granted zero mercy by the shooter... Killer deserves the same courtesy - 50 years before he can apply for early release was the right answer. CBCNews icircpremiere
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Supreme Court to rule on constitutionality of life without parole in case of Quebec City mosque shooterA Supreme Court ruling could leave Alexandre Bissonnette and Alek Minassian eligible for a parole hearing after 25 years We are researching how 9/11 & now virus 2020 were funded. The two dumbest ideas in human history. 100% if you kill multiple people this should stack on you. Take a life pay a life Canada needs to model its sentencing laws after the US as more people need to be incarcerated for life without parole. There should be no such thing as day parole or furloughs & more young offenders need to be tried as adults.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

This Cape Cod-style home in Riverdale just hit the market for $2.6 millionThe secluded property is the only one on the street But what street is it on?
Source: torontolife - 🏆 20. / 68 Read more »

Quebec mosque shooter can apply for parole after 25 years, Supreme Court rulesThe Supreme Court of Canada says Alexandre Bissonnette, who went on a deadly shooting spree at a Quebec City mosque, can apply for parole after 25 years behind bars. They better not give him parole, but I wouldn't be surprised if they did 🤦‍♂️ Alll murders should get life and no parole at all. Canada you. Suck when it comes to the justice system Unconstitutional? Really?He has the rights of any human. He does not have the rights of law abiding citizens. And ever kid gets a trophy.
Source: CP24 - 🏆 30. / 67 Read more »