COP27 gives farmers hope for domestic climate policy

  • 📰 iPoliticsCA
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 32 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 63%

Canada Headlines News

Canada Latest News,Canada Headlines

Canadian farmers who attended COP27 left with a sense of what can happen when their sector has a stake in the global climate agenda. They're hoping a decision document that came out of the conference sets the tone for more government-farmer collaboration.

A farmer applies a natural fertilizer on his crop at his farm in in the southern India.

Canadian farmers and ranchers who attended COP27 left with a sense of what can happen when their sector has a stake in the global climate agenda. The two-week UN summit, which featured delegates and governments from nearly 200 countries, sought to mobilize greater climate action around the world in key sectors — agriculture being one of them.

Perhaps it was due to the ongoing hunger crisis or lessons learned from government-imposed agricultural policy in Netherlands and Sri Lanka, but this year’s program had food systems as a key focus and left space for producers and farm organizations to lead conversations.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 36. in CA

Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Opinion | Global loss and damage fund a huge gain from COP27Opinion: With climate catastrophes front of mind, the international community agreed for the first time to develop a global loss and damage fund. They need to develop a global birth control fund too. Ah the great reset. In the words of the bard “would a pile of dung by any other name smell as foul?”
Source: TorontoStar - 🏆 60. / 55 Read more »

Guilbeault, environmentalists celebrate COP27 loss and damages agreementCOP27 produced a fund that will require rich nations like Canada to compensate developing countries, which are most vulnerable to climate change. But environmentalists were disappointed to see Canada block language on phasing out fossil fuels. Always giving our money away. How is Canada a “rich country” when we are 1.2 Trillion in debt. It was a failure that Canada released a policy document at COP27 on how Ontario eliminated their reliance on coal power and excluded that non-emitting nuclear energy provided over ninety per cent of the electricity to make it possible.
Source: iPoliticsCA - 🏆 36. / 63 Read more »

COP 27 and a glass half fullLONDON, U.K.—As after every climate summit, the air is filled with shouts of rage and despair. What was agreed was unclear and inadequate, and what was left undecided or simply ignored was vast and terrifying. For example, they still haven’t managed to agree that the world needs to stop burning fossil fuels. What? Isn’t that what this whole traveling circus is about? The climate is getting hotter because we’re burning fossil fuels for energy. Soon, people will die in large numbers, and in 20 or 30 years, entire countries will become uninhabitable, so stop! Alternative energy sources are available! Act now, or a global disaster will happen! Yes, that’s what it’s about, and every year tens of thousands of politicians, experts, campaigners, and lobbyists trek to a different location—last year in Glasgow, Scotland, COP27 this year in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, next year the United Arab Emirates—to debate and decide how to deal with this existential threat. And in all those 27 years, they haven’t even managed to mention the name of the threat? No, they haven’t. Last year, for the first time, they actually inserted the word “coal” into the final report—we will eventually “phase it down” (not “out”), they said—but the words “gas” and ‘oil’ are still taboo. This is what you get when a global institution is ruled by consensus. Everybody has a veto, including the coal-, gas-, and oil-dependent countries—and the short-term interests of some (money and rapid fossil-fuelled economic growth) clash with everybody’s long-term interest in not experiencing a massive population die-back and civilizational collapse. Oh, well. This is the price you pay for belonging to a species still emerging from a long tribal past that had developed a high-tech, high-energy civilization before it was culturally equipped to manage it. Do the best you can, and hope that it will be enough. So much for the philosophy. What actually happened at Sharm el-Sheikh? After the inevitable all-night negotiations (tw
Source: TheHillTimes - 🏆 11. / 79 Read more »

Is Canada trying to match or outdo American hostility to China?TORONTO—Is Canada trying to match or outdo American hostility to China? Government actions point to such an ill-considered approach. Rather than seeking to develop a more constructive relationship, while defending our values,  the Trudeau government seems to be going out of its way to engage in its own Cold War with China.  In a recent speech in Washington, D.C., Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden’s plan for “near-shoring,” which means prioritizing imports from friendly allies rather than China. But it’s also a new form of protectionism that will fragment, at great expense, existing supply chains and result in higher prices for many products. While we must avoid dependence on one country for products critical to national security, that should be a very small list.  Freeland’s visit to Washington was quickly followed by that of Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne where he, reportedly, promised to reduce Canadian imports from China, a lose-lose scenario since China could reduce imports from Canada. Returning to Canada, Champagne then ordered Chinese investors to sell their shares in three Canadian junior mining companies, because, he claimed, they threatened Canadian national security even though two of them were pursing projects in Chile and Argentina, not Canada. The order may have had more to do with accommodating U.S. efforts to reduce China’s presence in Latin America.  Asked to explain, Industry Canada said “the government has concluded that a lack of secure access to critical minerals found and developed both within and outside of Canada, by Canadian firms, is a source of national security risk for Canada.” This is a dramatic shift from January when the government approved the $960-million takeover of Neo Lithium Corp., a Canadian company developing a lithium mine in Argentina, by a Chinese state-owned enterprise. The new policy will hurt small Canadian mining companies seeking capital and could weaken Canada’s role a This Canadian stance has been way too long in coming
Source: TheHillTimes - 🏆 11. / 79 Read more »

Dior Beauty Canada: Dior Launches Its Canadian Beauty WebsiteVirtually designed with meticulous detail and lavish Dior DNA, Canada’s first luxury e-boutique dedicated to Dior Beauty Canada is now live.
Source: FashionCanada - 🏆 35. / 63 Read more »

Style Q&A: Canadian brand Partaje offers 'highly considered' designsThe small Canadian brand offers elevated pieces for the self and home.
Source: TheTorontoSun - 🏆 23. / 68 Read more »