Mr Turnbull cited the Paris Agreement on climate change and the advice of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to warn that anyone who rejected the net-zero target by 2050 was, in effect, supporting an increase in global temperatures of 3 degrees, which would make much of the world "uninhabitable".This challenge is real.
While Mr Turnbull has taken issue with Mr Morrison in the past, the speech represented a significant and forceful attack when the government is fomenting political alarm overMr Turnbull said the facts showed Australia could achieve net zero in a way that lowered energy pricesHe said while the Howard government confronted a cost barrier to reducing emissions when it advocated an emissions trading scheme, the dramatic fall in the cost of renewable energy meant it was now cheaper to reduce...
CroweDM
CroweDM Crap Grandstanding again on many issues just to keep himself in the public eye
CroweDM 🤦🏽♂️
CroweDM Where was this man on this issue when he was Prime Minister. Turnbull is full of it.
CroweDM Malcolm’s Climate Emergency now seriously outflanked by a real emergency.
CroweDM Yes we should em b b b b buffff bb embrace the copper future of high speed iinternet eh Mal.. Have another wine mate and stay home.
CroweDM Former PM embraces the Green Left!
CroweDM Who the hell cares what this fool says, give it a rest media.
CroweDM TurnbullMalcolm And that catastrophic future will be even worse if Lucy Turnbull from the Greater Sydney Commission is allowed to increase Sydney's population to 8 million by continuing an unsustainable immigration program
CroweDM So I take it Malcolm is the new poster boy for the SMH.
CroweDM Yes catastrophic indeed when his interests in grant funded ‘climate change’ schemes fail as a result of us mot moving to ‘net zero’?
CroweDM gee, if only he'd ever been in a position to do something about it eh
CroweDM Malcolm's rich enough to care about 'net zero'; most of us are thinking about how to pay our exorbitant private rents. It's a luxury to worry about extinction, sitting in your harbourside mansion, mulling it all over over a glass of wine. Oh dear.
CroweDM Beginning to understand why he was rolled as PM. Very smart after the fact - just nutless when it comes to doing anything constructive. Talk is cheap.
CroweDM It would have been catastrophic if he was PM !
CroweDM He totally screwed up the internet for Australia and could do nothing about climate change as PM in govt. Why do we now care what he thinks?
CroweDM Who keeps hiring this loser to say things he didn’t have the spine to say 2 years ago?
CroweDM 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Tell us another one
CroweDM Pity he didn’t have the balls to do something about this when he was PM TurnbullMalcolm
CroweDM At a price, yes we can move to net zero - need nuclear power to achieve. However why would we bother when the world's biggest polluters, including China (30%) US (15%) & emergers like India & Indonesia continue to build coal plants - hundreds every year. Aust. has a total of 24.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Turnbull lashes former Liberal colleagues over climate policy | Sky News AustraliaFormer prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has lashed his former colleagues over climate policy, describing their comments to a net zero emissions target as 'false and misleading'.\n\nAt a meeting of energy executives on Tuesday, Mr Turnbull warned of a 'catastrophic' future if Australia did not move towards a carbon neutral emissions target by 2050. \n\nThe policy, which has now been adopted by Labor, has been heavily criticised by Nationals MPs who argued it would put the country's agriculture industry at risk.\n\nImage: News Corp Australia TurnbullMalcolm Malcolm Turnbull is the epitome of false and misleading. Stinky ghost 👻 TurnbullMalcolm Your a gem Turnbull, your only interest once again is in the profits you can make from your subsidised Wind Farms. TurnbullMalcolm Why we give this accidental prime minister airtime is beyond me...
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Zero common sense in 'net-zero' parliamentary debateAnalysis: A pledge signed by a Coalition government is conveniently forgotten when Scott Morrison is trying to paint Anthony Albanese as an economic wrecker | CroweDM CroweDM Zero nonsense, no one has explained yet what is zero emissions, nothing but a catchy slogan CroweDM AnAl is an economic wrecker, this isn’t a lie. He’s just another latte socialist parasite. CroweDM The foreign white Anglo-Christian migrant heritage community of Australians, like PM ScoMo, is all about serving themselves. Since British-Whites illegally annexed Australia as British territory like they did with Ireland. This is all about pissing in the wind by the PM!
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Australia must hit net zero by 2050 to meet Paris: scientistsTop scientists say for Australia to honour the Paris Agreement and limit global warming to less than two degrees Celsius the country must reach net zero emission before 2050 But Barnaby_Joyce mattjcan CraigKellyMP M_McCormackMP AngusTaylorMP and others have the LiberalAus & The_Nationals by the short and curlies. 'top scientists' 🙄 Why listen to scientists, when we could rot our brains listening to FossilFuelShills, IgnorantBoganPollies and ReligiousNutJobs instead!
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Australia must hit net zero by 2050 to meet Paris: scientistsTop scientists say for Australia to honour the Paris Agreement and limit global warming to less than two degrees, the country must reach net zero emissions before 2050 Yes, no doubt the alt right bobbleheads will be on their microphones screaming the house down with, what would the scientists know. Zero by 2050 is not sole test of climate purity - it is one case, others push out to end of century. Given modle uncertainties & other impacts on climate (sun) it shows this is not the one hill to die on with no test of cost/benefit It took less than 10 years to put a man on the Moon why do we even need 30 years to de-carbonise our economy? We've already identified the alternative sources of energy and done mass user testing to see it works.
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Barnaby Joyce accuses NSW govt of ulterior motives in zero net emissions commitment | Sky News AustraliaFormer deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce has criticised the New South Wales government for committing to a 2050 zero net emissions target claiming the Berejiklian government only adopted it to obtain Greens preferences at the next election.\n\nThe Nationals MP added the government was not being honest about the economic costs of the target, which he said would be a huge burden on industry.\n\nImage: News Corp Australia\n\n Barnaby_Joyce GladysB Haven’t the LNP already adopted that target for the nation when they signed the Paris Agreement? Barnaby_Joyce GladysB No Barnaby. It’s sensible policy to encourage investment Barnaby_Joyce GladysB So I guess the 73 countries around the world are all chasing greens preferences. Every state and territory in Australia are chasing green preferences. Barnaby is so yesterday, he is a backbenchers so why do you bother with his rants. The man is a brainless drunken philanderer
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Coalition must follow Albanese on target of net zero by 2050Editorial: The ALP has committed to a sensible, responsible target for carbon emissions. But the Coalition is spurning bipartisanship in favour of political opportunism Approving Adanis environmental rape is not being 'responsible' Nobody cares what Australia does. Not even Australians. Nothing we do will make any difference and nobody will notice anyway. How much $$$ cost SMH🤪🤪🤪
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »