Trump ally Steve Bannon held in criminal contempt of Congress

Nine Republicans voted with all 220 Democrats to pass the resolution. #9News

22/10/2021 11:01:00 AM

Nine Republicans voted with all 220 Democrats to pass the resolution. 9News

The House of Representatives in the US voted on Thursday to hold Steve Bannon, one of former President Donald Trump's closest allies, in criminal contempt of Congress

The vote was 229-202.Nine Republicans voted with all 220 Democrats to pass the resolution: House Select Committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney, Reps. Adam Kinzinger, Nancy Mace, Fred Upton, Peter Meijer, John Katko, Brian Fitzpatrick, Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio, and Jaime Herrera Beutler.

Anthony Albanese ‘caught out’ on climate policy Ombudsman: Border permits were ‘downright unjust, even inhumane’ Labor sends message to Greens to get on board emissions target

READ MORE:Steve Bannon, one of former President Donald Trump's closest allies.(AP)Rep. Greg Pence, the brother of former Vice President Mike Pence, who was presiding over the electoral vote count on January 6, did not vote.The action marks a significant escalation in how far Democrats are willing to go to rebuke individuals who refuse to cooperate as the House Select Committee investigates the violent attack that sought to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

The vote by the full House to hold Mr Bannon in criminal contempt of Congress sets up a referral to the Department of Justice (DOJ), which would then have to decide whether to prosecute.Attorney General Merrick Garland on Thursday said the Justice Department would review any referral, but at a House Judiciary Committee hearing, he did not say what the DOJ decision would be.

"The Department of Justice will do what it always does in such circumstances, we'll apply the facts and the law and make a decision, consistent with the principles of prosecution," Mr Garland said.A protester holds a sign outside of the House side of the US Capitol.

(Bloomberg)$60 million Powerball ticket won by Melbourne coupleEarlier in the afternoon, the House voted to approve the rule providing for consideration of the contempt resolution.The rule passed on a largely party-line vote of 221 to 205, with only two Republicans joining Democrats to vote in favour.

"This isn't about punishing Steve Bannon," Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson, who chairs the House committee, said on Thursday."But Steve Bannon has led us down this path by refusing to cooperate in any way with our investigation."

He added, "we need to take a stand for the Select Committee's investigation and for the integrity of this body".Representative Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat from New York and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.(Bloomberg)Melbourne CBD erupts with noise at midnight as lockdown lifts

Black Lives Matter Christmas campaign is ‘racist’ PM accused of 'failure of leadership' after George Christensen calls for COVID protests at embassies Teachers union takes aim at Perrottet: 'You don't care about kids'

"What sort of precedent would it set for the House of Representatives if we allow a witness to ignore us flat out without facing any kind of consequences?"Mr Bannon has previously argued he is unable to cooperate with the committee until matters of executive privilege are resolved by the courts.

His attorney has told the committee "the executive privileges belong to President Trump" and "we must accept his direction and honour his invocation of executive privilege".Next steps after the voteFollowing the vote, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is expected to certify the report to the United States attorney for the District of Columbia.

Steve Bannon was President Donald Trump's former chief strategist.(AP)'Key' alleged crime family member arrestedUnder law, this certification then requires the United States attorney to "bring the matter before the grand jury for its action," but the Justice Department will also make its own determinations for prosecution.

Any individual who is found liable for contempt of Congress would be guilty of a crime that may result in a fine and between one and 12 months' imprisonment.But this process is rarely invoked and rarely leads to jail time.Rep. Jim Jordan walks down the House steps.

(AP)One person dead after bus and car crash in Sydney's westHolding Mr Bannon in criminal contempt through a prosecution could take years, and historically, criminal contempt cases have been derailed by appeals and acquittals.As a result, the House's pursuit of criminal charges may be more about making an example out of Mr Bannon and sending a message to other potential witnesses.

"I want our witnesses to understand something very plainly. If you are thinking of following the path Mr Bannon has gone down, you are on notice that this is what you'll face," Mr Thompson said on Tuesday.A stark partisan divideThe vast majority of House Republicans opposed the effort to hold Mr Bannon in contempt of Congress, brushing aside concerns about weakening the institution's future oversight authority and rejecting accusations they're trying to block Democrats from getting to the bottom of the January 6 insurrection.

International students arrive in Sydney Ombudsman: Border permits were ‘downright unjust, even inhumane’ Who is Australia's next great batter? Outside the Rope | Wide World of Sports

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, when pressed by CNN on Thursday on whether he's okay with people defying congressional subpoenas, said the January 6 Select Committee's subpoena of Mr Bannon is "invalid"."He has the right to go to the court to see if he has executive privilege or not. I don't know if he does or not, but neither does the committee," Mr McCarthy said.

Representative Liz Cheney, a Republican from Wyoming..(Bloomberg)Small bones found at playground construction site on Sydney's Northern Beaches"So they're weakening the power of Congress itself by issuing invalid subpoenas."Liz Cheney, one of two Republicans on the special committee, criticised her colleagues on Thursday (US time) for protecting Mr Bannon.

"There are people in this chamber right now who were with me and with the rest of us on that day during that attack," Ms Cheney said."People who now seem to have forgotten the danger of the moment, the assault on the Constitution, the assault on our Congress.

"People who you will hear argue that there is simply no legislative purpose for this committee for this investigation or for this subpoena."Capitol fenced off after day of chaosView GalleryMs Cheney said the former President knew the riot was happening and took no action to stop it.

"President Trump knew it was happening. Indeed he may have been watching it all unfold on television. And yet he took no immediate action to stop it," she said. Read more: Nine News Australia »

Gladys Berejiklian 'done over' by 'shameful' ICAC: Scott Morrison

Prime Minister Scott Morrison has said that former NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian was "done over" by an ICAC investigation.

Why lock out double jab QLD out report that , apply for border pass and you get brave to boarder and get turned around say the truth Well, Congress is indeed contemptible. There just jealous at how well Mr Bannon is leaning into the role of Silver Fox Then there is some hope for the future of the United State where reason and compassion prevails, rather than idiocy and cruelty... I have my fingers crossed that it will survive as a Democracy to celebrate its 250th anniversary in 2026....