China is well on its way to achieving its goal of complete military modernisation by 2027 and already has more warships and submarines than the US. China’s shipyards launch a new sub every year or so.
By that time, Australia will have exactly as many subs as it has today, which is the same number it had a quarter-century earlier, according to Morrison government’s statements on Thursday. But it does represent an increased level of trust and an intensified commitment to share technology and advanced weaponry. This includes co-operation on some of the same next-generation technologies that Beijing has declared as its highest tech priorities – quantum computing, quantum communication, artificial intelligence and cyber.
But the three wartime allies have chosen to announce as their first initiative a plan to help Australia acquire nuclear propulsion technology for submarines. First, the Morrison government has cancelled the existing contracts to buy 12 French-designed submarines. This was the deal that the Turnbull government struck five years ago. The subs, to be built in Adelaide based on French design, were to cost an estimated lifetime total of $90 billion. The first was supposed to enter the water in about a decade from now.
But we know from the Morrison government that the proposed new nuclear subs will be delivered years later than the French-designed subs, and cost more. And because it’s planning “at least eight”, Australia could end up with fewer than the 12 in the previous deal.
Finally someone who analysed the announcement objectively. Not blinded by shiny new toys decades away. Great article
That’s why there is something called value engineering which is a problem solving technique that allows you to make the right decisions adding value and avoiding unnecessary costs! We have founded the ANZ + 4 Chapter for SAVE International (USA) to raise awareness about VE.
Two countries have shared their technology with us. That's because that they benefit from our location . They benefit from our country; one a trade surplus.
Australia has been flanked. We had to dump the anti nuclear legislation to stay abreast of what is being pointed at us
The next election maybe a vote on the establishment of a nuclear energy future in Australia.
So bloody stupid it’s funny.
So we can plan for a conflict that *might* happen 20 years from now… But don’t have a plan for climate change that is happening now.
Ummm, I think you'll find we're building them ourselves.
The re-election of Christopher Pyne….$90b
They’ll probably slap a huge tariff on Camembert and plonk to punish those ‘orrible Aussies
Another whitey exclusionist alliance. What will our pacific neighbours think of this? Without Japan, Korea and India this smacks of another diplomatic slap in the face for our Asian and pacific friends.
How much will the cancelled contract cost us? I’m concerned that we might end up paying top dollar to ‘rent’ some American subs. Do we have a nuclear maintenance capability in Oz?
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »
Source: newscomauHQ - 🏆 9. / 77 Read more »